sue

Celsius creditors committee proposes suing Mashinsky, other Celsius execs

The proposed lawsuit names Alex Mashinsky and a number of former executives and co-founders for alleged “recklessness, gross mismanagement, and self-interested conduct.”

The official committee of Celsius creditors is proposing to sue Celsius co-founder Alex Mashinsky and other executives for “fraud, recklessness, gross mismanagement and self-interested conduct” that eventually led to the collapse of the crypto lender.

In a proposed complaint filed in a New York Bankruptcy Court on Feb. 14, attorneys representing the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors said the move follows six months of investigations into Celsius’ current and former directors, officers and employees.

The committee is made up of seven Celsius account holders and was appointed by the U.S. Trustee in July. The committee represents the interest of Celsius account holders along with unsecured creditors.

“The Committee’s investigation has uncovered significant claims and causes of action based on fraud, recklessness, gross mismanagement, and self-interested conduct by the Debtors’ former directors and officers,” wrote lawyers from White & Case LLC.

The proposed lawsuit — which seeks damages in an amount to be proven at trial — aims to bring claims and causes of action against the following Celsius executives, persons and their associated entities:

  • Alex Mashinsky, co-founder, director and former CEO
  • Daniel Leon, co-founder, director and former CSO and chief operating officer
  • Hanoch “Nuke” Goldstein, co-founder and chief technology officer
  • Harumi Urata-Thompson, former chief financial officer and chief investment officer
  • Jeremie Beaudry, former general counsel and chief compliance office
  • Johannes Treutler, former head of Celsius’ trading desk and person in charge of purchasing CEL tokens on behalf of Celsius
  • Aliza Landes, the former vice president of Lending of Celsius and spouse of Daniel Leon
  • Kristine Mashinsky, the spouse of Alex Mashinsky

“Mr. Mashinsky, Mr. Leon, Mr. Goldstein, Mr. Beaudry, Ms. Urata-Thompson, and Mr. Treutler breached their fiduciary obligations to Celsius,” the lawyers wrote, adding:

“Those parties were aware Celsius was promising its customer’s interest payments that it could not afford and did nothing to fix the problem.”

The lawyers have also alleged the executives made “negligent, reckless (and sometimes self-interested) investments” causing Celsius to lose $1 billion in a single year, while mismanagement led to another quarter-of-a-billion dollar loss “because they could not adequately account for the company’s assets and liabilities.”

“After that loss, they did not invest in or develop the company’s systems to adequately fix the issue, resulting in further losses,” they alleged.

The motion also alleges the executives directed Celsius to spend “hundreds of millions of dollars” on public markets to inflate the price of CEL tokens, while they “secretly sold tens of millions of CEL tokens (or were aware of such sales)” for their own benefit.

Excerpt from the recent motion from Celsius’ official creditors committee. Source: Stretto

“They sat idly by as Mr. Mashinsky recklessly bet hundreds of millions of dollars on the movement of the cryptocurrency market. They covered up Mr. Mashinsky’s repeated lies about Celsius’ investments and financial condition.”

Related: Judge denies motions from Celsius users seeking to reclaim assets

“Finally, when it became apparent that Celsius would be required to file for bankruptcy, the Prospective Defendants withdrew assets from the sinking ship […] while actively encouraging customers to keep their assets on the Celsius platform,” the lawyers added.

The Celsius creditors committee said the proposed complaint was just the “first of many steps” in its investigation into potential former Celsius executive wrongdoings and the return of assets to victims.

A hearing on the proposed complaint will be held on March 8.

Cointelegraph contacted Celsius for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

Logan Paul and CryptoZoo hit with lawsuit as investors take action

Plaintiff Don Holland has filed a lawsuit against CryptoZoo and Logan Paul, alleging the YouTube influencer’s “fraudulent venture” executed a “rug pull.”

CryptoZoo and Logan Paul have been named as defendants in a newly filed class-action lawsuit, which alleges they stole millions of dollars worth of purchaser’s cryptocurrency via a “fraudulent venture.”

In a court filing on Feb. 2 in the District Court of the Western District of Texas, plaintiff Don Holland alleged that Paul and executives at CryptoZoo (CZ) “executed a ‘rug pull’” by promising purchasers of the nonfungible tokens (NFTs) exclusive access to crypto assets among other benefits, but ultimately abandoned the project and kept the funds.

“As part of Defendants’ NFT scheme, Defendants marketed CZ NFTs to purchasers by falsely claiming that, in exchange for transferring cryptocurrency to purchase the CZ NFT, purchasers would later receive benefits, including, among other things, rewards, exclusive access to other cryptocurrency assets, and the support of an online ecosystem to use and market CZ NFTs,” it wrote.

“In reality, soon after completing the sale of all their CZ NFTs, Defendants, together with others […] transferred millions of dollars’ worth of purchasers’ cryptocurrency to, among other places, wallets controlled by Defendants,” it alleged.

The lawsuit was submitted by attorneys from Ellzey & Associates and Attorney Tom and Associates, the latter of which is the law firm run by YouTube personality Attorney Tom.

In a YouTube video on Jan. 16, Attorney Tom told viewers that they are suing Paul over the alleged crypto scam after “weeks of investigation and speaking to a number of Crypto Zoo victims.”

Other defendants named in the suit include Danielle Strobel, Jeff Levin, Eddie Ibanez, Jake Greenbaum (Crypto King) and Ophir Bentov (Ben Roth), according to Attorney Tom.

This lawsuit comes despite Paul unveiling a $1.5 million recovery plan for disgruntled investors in the CryptoZoo project via a video on Twitter on Jan. 13.

He also revealed that he is no longer going to sue CoffeeZilla over his allegations that his project is a scam, stating that suing him is “not going to help Cryptozoo holders,” adding that he wants to focus on “fans and supporters of him.”

Related: Logan Paul backflips on defamation lawsuit against Coffeezilla, apologizes

Paul outlined his recovery plan will consist of three stages — stating the first stage will be himself and the co-founder of CryptoZoo, Jeff Levin, burning their ZOO token holdings.

He clarified in doing this they will “have no financial upside” in the game, and it will “add value to the holders’ tokens.”

Paul claimed the second stage will involve him personally committing 1,000 Ether (ETH) to the project so that “disappointed” investors can burn their NFTs to get their initial investment of 0.1 ETH back, the cost to mint the NFT.

Meanwhile the third and final stage he hopes to “deliver the game as outlined in the whitepaper.”