Polkadot

Circle Product VP: USDC chain expansion part of ‘multichain’ vision

Speaking with Cointelegraph, Circle’s vice president of product Joao Reginatto emphasized that devs soon won’t care what blockchain they build on, as interoperability will be key.

USD Coin (USDC) issuers Circle have announced that it will soon roll out its stablecoin across five additional networks including Polkadot, Optimism, Near, Arbitrum and Cosmos.

The firm first dropped the news at the Converge22 event on Sept. 28 and noted that support for most of these blockchains will be rolled out by the end of 2023, while USDC on Cosmos will go live at the start of 2023.

In a Sept. 28 statement, Circle’s vice president of Product Joao Reginatto emphasized that the expansion of USDC will provide “greater liquidity and interoperability within the crypto economy,” particularly the commercial sector.

“Extending multi-chain support for USDC opens the door for institutions, exchanges, developers and more to innovate and have easier access to a trusted and stable digital dollar,” he said.

In a follow-up interview with Cointelegraph, Reginatto outlined that while Circle initially built USDC on Ethereum as more development and activity was happening there, it always had a vision that the future would be a “multichain world.”

As such, Circle is expanding USDC support under the premise of devs preferring interoperability over working with just one network:

“We knew already at the time that there were a lot of interesting things happening in other ecosystems, and we thought that over time developers and application builders; they are not going to be so much concerned about the Layer 1 or the Layer 2 infrastructure that they’re using.”

“They will want interoperability, they will want flexibility to be able to port their solutions across ecosystems,” he added.

Reginatto did note that while Circle is pushing ahead with expanding USDC support, given the current size of the stablecoin — with a market cap of $48.9 billion — the firm won’t just jump behind any network.

He outlined that Circle conducts a lot of due diligence before it selects the next blockchain to work with.

“There’s a lot of risks that we have now that we perhaps didn’t have two or three years ago. So we take it with a lot of diligence. We have a team of folks across all the functions in the company kind of assessing all these ecosystems and prioritizing them over time.

Once the extra support is officially rolled out, USDC will be available on a total of 13 blockchains. In comparison, Circle’s main competitor Tether currently lists Tether (USDT) support for eight networks on its website.

“Upon launch, developers will be able to use Circle APIs for fiat on/off-ramps to and from USDC in their products, as well as programmable wallets infrastructure,” Circle stated on Twitter.

Related: Circle CEO says blockchain industry is transitioning from dial-up to broadband phase

Commenting on the use cases for USDC and stablecoins in the current context of crypto, Reginatto highlighted key avenues such as marketplace payouts, remittances, and global settlements for financial institutions:

“There’s no real good interoperability across all these banking systems and regional rails. Stablecoins have a really, really good value proposition for that.”

“Stripe utilizing USDC rails for marketplace payouts. Embedding that as part of their marketplace payouts products, just being able to reach people that their customers need to pay out, that with traditional rails they can’t reach. So that there is clear concrete value that the substrate can deliver for those kinds of use cases,” he added.

Staking on Polkadot, explained

There’s a big buzz around staking right now — but when it comes to Polkadot, there’s a big difference between exchanges.

Are there any other limitations to consider?

Yes — as your funds may need to be locked up in order for rewards to be generated.

With some non-custodial staking providers, you need to delegate a minimum of 120 DOT in order to stake — that’s worth about $840 at the time of writing. Worse still, failing to withdraw rewards regularly can mean they vanish after just 12 weeks.

In some cases, you can lose your rewards and end up paying punishing fees if you try to redeem your DOT early, too.

XGo does things differently and says it offers staking rewards for DOT balances of up to $10,000 through its Superfluid rewards mechanism.

The project’s founders say they want to offer exciting products as they make a foray into centralized finance — and give retail crypto users the options they deserve.

Learn more about XGo

Disclaimer. Cointelegraph does not endorse any content or product on this page. While we aim at providing you with all important information that we could obtain, readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company and carry full responsibility for their decisions, nor can this article be considered as investment advice.

Doesn’t staking impact liquidity?

It can do — and in some cases, you may have to lock up your DOT for 120 days.

A lot can happen in 120 days — case in point, DOT fell from an all-time high of $55 to lows of $17 over this timeframe… down 69%. This painfully shows why it’s important to assess your options, and consider staking providers where you can earn yield without enduring long lock-up periods and helplessly watching your crypto plunge in value.

In some cases, it can take 28 days to unbond from a validator node — while in others, you can choose between fixed periods of 30, 60, 90 or 120 days.

But XGo is completely rethinking this approach. This platform offers no lock-ups on withdrawals and no unbonding period, meaning you’re fully in control. Better still, rewards are paid out daily — and you can transfer your assets at any time.

Given how there’s heightened fear in the crypto markets, and a lot of uncertainty driven by the Federal Reserve’s mission to increase interest rates and tackle red-hot inflation, this much-needed flexibility helps keep HODLers in the driving seat.

What type of yield is on offer for stakers?

This can vary from one platform to another — but it’s crucial to check that the yield is sustainable.

Before the recent crypto contagion set in, many investors were wooed by sky-high returns that ultimately proved unsustainable. As a result, thousands of customers at multiple platforms now remain locked out of their accounts — with withdrawals frozen. While it is possible to get interest rates that beat what’s on offer at mainstream banks, it’s important to tread carefully and go with a trading platform you can trust.

Across mainstream brands, the yield for Polkadot staking varies between 9% and 16.5%. That’s quite a large spread — and as you would expect, each proposition comes with a distinctive range of pros and cons. In order to secure greater gains, some investors use staked $DOT derivatives — or lock it into liquidity pools. While growing your savings in this way may seem tempting at first, it’s important to remember it isn’t without risk.

The old adage in investing circles is that you should only invest what you’re prepared to lose. In crypto circles, what really matters is understanding the nuts and bolts of how things work, and whether it’s sustainable. You should also consider the lock-up periods that are associated with different staking propositions.

And what’s the difference between validators and nominators?

It’s quite expensive to become a validator on Polkadot — but this doesn’t mean you can’t get involved in the staking process.

The latest figures suggest that node operators need to have 2 million DOT staked by delegators in order to operate — and at the time of writing, that’s worth $14 million.

Each delegator also needs to stake a minimum of 120 DOT in order to win the right to participate in the block validation process.

It’s important to note that Polkadot does things slightly differently because it implements a Nominated Proof-of-Stake mechanism.

This encourages DOT holders to become nominators, and they’ll be tasked with picking up to 16 others as validator candidates. Everyone then locks up their tokens to get rewards.

As Polkadot’s website concerns, fairness is a key consideration: “The staking system pays out rewards essentially equally to all validators regardless of stake. Having more stake on a validator does not influence the amount of block rewards it receives.”

Of course, for crypto enthusiasts with limited technical knowledge — or those with little time — staking through exchanges instead can be a tantalizing proposition.

What makes Polkadot different from other Proof-of-Stake networks?

This is a platform that focuses on inter-blockchain communication — ensuring that different networks can talk to one another.

Polkadot was established by Gavin Wood — and if that name sounds familiar, there’s a good reason why. He co-founded Ethereum and created the Solidity smart contract language.

A key difference with Polkadot lies in how highly customizable Layer 1 blockchains can be established using this infrastructure… and they won’t be siloed from the ecosystem.

At the beating heart of this network are validators responsible for governance and security, as well as ensuring that “parachains” remain in constant communication.

When Polkadot was formed, key decision choices were made that have helped make the ecosystem what it is today. A crucial difference concerns the wide variation of pooling options that are available to users — eliminating the high barriers to entry that often stop validator nodes from receiving staking rewards.

Network and token freeze after Acala exploit raises questions

The Acala hack saw over one billion aUSD stablecoins minted from thin air, but now community members are scratching their heads wondering how a decentralized protocol would handle the clean up.

The Acala Network’s aUSD stablecoin depegged by over 99% over the weekend and forced the Acala team to pause a hacker’s wallet, raising concerns about its claim of being decentralized.

On Sunday, a hacker took advantage of a bug on the iBTC/aUSD liquidity pool which resulted in 1.2 billion aUSD being minted without collateral. This event crashed the United States dollar-pegged stablecoin to $.01, and in response, the Acala team froze the erroneously minted tokens by placing the network in maintenance mode.

The move also halted other features such as swaps, xcm (cross-chain communications on Polkadot), and the oracle pallet price feeds until “further notice.”

While the move to put the network in maintenance mode and freeze funds in the hacker’s wallet may have been meant to protect users and the network from any further harm, proponents of decentralization have cried foul.

Acala is a cross-chain decentralized finance (DeFi) hub that issues the aUSD stablecoin based on the Polkadot blockchain. aUSD is a crypto-backed stablecoin which Acala claims is censorship-resistant. iBTC is a form of Wrapped Bitcoin (wBTC), which can be used in DeFi protocols.

Community members have noted the irony of Acala’s claims about aUSD’s censorship resistance since the protocol froze funds so swiftly. Twitter user Gr33nHatt3R.dot pointed out on Aug. 14 that decisions “would have to go to governance to be ‘decentralized’ finance:”

“If Acala centrally controls that decision is this really DeFi?”

A member of the project’s Discord channel usafmike proposed rolling back the chain to reverse the token mints altogether but was challenged by skylordafk.dot, another member who said such an action would “set a harmful precedent.”

As of the time of writing, the network was still in maintenance mode to block all token transfers, but the team confirmed that the bug had been fixed. The wallets that received erroneously minted aUSD have been identified, and 99% of them were still on Acala which leaves the possibility that they may be retrieved by the community if it votes to do so.

Related: Binance recovers the majority of funds stolen from Curve Finance

The Acala exploit is the second major one in a week as Curve Finance experienced an attack on its front end on Aug. 9, which directed users to approve a malicious contract. Acala’s problem differs from Curve’s, as the latter’s pools were not compromised as users who directly interacted with its smart contracts experienced no issues.

aUSD is the latest stablecoin to lose its peg in the past few months, starting notoriously with TerraUSD (UST) in May, which has since been renamed to TerraUSD Classic (USTC). Other notable depegs include Tether (USDT) and Dei (DEI).

Interlay launches trustless BTC stablecoin bridge on Polkadot

InterBTC operates as a BTC-backed stablecoin, secured by a decentralized network of overcollateralized vaults, which according to Interlay, resembles MakerDAO’s DAI token.

Interlay, a London-based blockchain firm, launched a Bitcoin (BTC)-based cross-chain bridge on Polkadot (DOT). Named interBTC (iBTC), the bridge allows the use of Bitcoin on non-native blockchains for decentralized finance (DeFi), cross-chain transfers and nonfungible tokens (NFTs), among others.

interBTC operates as a BTC-backed stablecoin, secured by a decentralized network of overcollateralized vaults, which according to Interlay, resembles MakerDAO’s DAI token, a stablecoin on the Ethereum blockchain.

The iBTC vaults use mixed-asset collateral to insure BTC reserves, making iBTC redeemable 1:1 with BTC over the Bitcoin blockchain. As a preventive measure during unforeseen vault failure, the collateral is programmed to get slashed and reimburse the BTC depositors. Sharing the thought process behind the initiative, Interlay co-founder and CEO Alexei Zamyatin stated:

“Bitcoin is the driving force behind global crypto adoption, while Polkadot, Ethereum & co. is where technological innovation is happening. With interBTC, we combine the best of both worlds while preserving the trustless nature of Bitcoin.”

Interlay’s announcement also highlighted Ethereum co-founder and Polkadot inventor Gavin Wood’s vision of creating a fully decentralized Bitcoin bridge on Polkadot, which was made possible by interBTC. Acala and Moonbeam will be the first DeFi hubs to host iBTC’s debut, which will be supported by a $1 million liquidity program offered by the Interlay network treasury and partner projects.

The roadmap for iBTC involves being available on other major DeFi networks, including Ethereum, Cosmos, Solana and Avalanche.

Related: DeFi market has room for growth in Korea: 1inch co-founder — KBW 2022

Echoing Interlay’s interest in serving the DeFi and other crypto markets, DeFi aggregator 1inch Network eyes geographical expansion in newer jurisdictions. Speaking to Cointelegraph, DeFi aggregator 1inch Network co-founder Sergej Kunz revealed plans to expand its reach in Asia.

Kunz disclosed that 1inch is actively looking to partner with Asia-based Web3 companies despite the small DeFi market in Korea and Asia, adding that:

“Here, there are a lot of people who like gaming and a lot of things like that, so I think the DeFi market can grow a lot in South Korea.”

1inch’s primary use case as a decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator involves identifying pools with the largest liquidity, lowest slippage and cheapest cryptocurrency exchange rates.

A slice of the punk: CryptoPunk NFT to be split into 56,000 pieces

A valuable CryptoPunk NFT is to be fractionalized as more than 56,000 addresses sign up for a share of ownership.

Nonfungible tokens (NFTs) continue to capture the imagination of the cryptocurrency space, with some of the most popular projects attracting hundreds of millions of dollars from investors. Projects such as CryptoPunks and the Bored Ape Yacht Club epitomize the exclusivity of the most lucrative collections, with each NFT far from accessible to the average investor.

A new campaign intends to give a wider base of investors a stake in some of the most valuable NFTs by fractionalizing ownership to reinstate accessibility. Unique Network, an NFT infrastructure running on the Kusama and Polkadot networks, will split the ownership of a CryptoPunk to more than 56,000 addresses that have signed up for a share.

The campaign offers users a chance to participate in what has become a highly siloed environment, as Unique Network CEO Alexander Mitrovich explained in a statement:

“This represents an exciting moment for interoperability. With our fractionalisation of Cryptopunk #3042 we are heralding a new era of NFTs that are accessible, interchangeable and can be shared across chains, and at a fraction of the cost.”

CryptoPunk #3042 was bought for 46.95 Ether (ETH) ($82,000) by Unique Network in June 2022 as cryptocurrency markets slumped to yearly lows. The NFT had originally been sold for $16 in November 2018 before CryptoPunks became one of the most exclusive Ethereum-based projects in the ecosystem and the trail-blazer for crypto-art and NFTs.

Unique Network’s acquisition of CryptoPunk #3042 was aimed at democratizing the asset as well as showcasing blockchain interoperability. There is no cost associated with signing up for a share of the CryptoPunk, which forms part of the firm’s Punks for the People campaign. 

Related: CryptoPunks’ trading volume surges 1,847% after Tiffany & Co. launches exclusive NFT collection

Interestingly, once addresses are airdropped with their individual refungible token, there will be significantly more owners of the single CryptoPunk on the Polkadot blockchain than the entire 10,000 original CryptoPunks running on Ethereum.

Unique Network will also fractionalize the ownership of one of its flagship Substrapunk NFTs. Inspired by CryptoPunks, Subtrapunks were the first NFTs to be minted on the Polkadot blockchain. 

A slice of the punk: CryptoPunk NFT to be split into thousands of pieces

A valuable CryptoPunk NFT is to be fractionalized as more than 56,000 addresses sign up for a share of ownership.

Nonfungible tokens (NFTs) continue to capture the imagination of the cryptocurrency space, with some of the most popular projects attracting hundreds of millions of dollars from investors. Projects such as CryptoPunks and the Bored Ape Yacht Club epitomize the exclusivity of the most lucrative collections, with each NFT far from accessible to the average investor.

A new campaign intends to give a wider base of investors a stake in some of the most valuable NFTs by fractionalizing ownership to reinstate accessibility. Unique Network, an NFT infrastructure running on the Kusama and Polkadot networks, will split the ownership of a CryptoPunk to more than 56,000 addresses that have signed up for a share.

The campaign offers users a chance to participate in what has become a highly siloed environment, as Unique Network CEO Alexander Mitrovich explained in a statement:

“This represents an exciting moment for interoperability. With our fractionalisation of Cryptopunk #3042 we are heralding a new era of NFTs that are accessible, interchangeable and can be shared across chains, and at a fraction of the cost.”

CryptoPunk #3042 was bought for 46.95 Ether (ETH) ($82,000) by Unique Network in June 2022 as cryptocurrency markets slumped to yearly lows. The NFT had originally been sold for $16 in November 2018 before CryptoPunks became one of the most exclusive Ethereum-based projects in the ecosystem and the trail-blazer for crypto-art and NFTs.

Unique Network’s acquisition of CryptoPunk #3042 was aimed at democratizing the asset as well as showcasing blockchain interoperability. There is no cost associated with signing up for a share of the CryptoPunk, which forms part of the firm’s Punks for the People campaign. 

Related: CryptoPunks’ trading volume surges 1,847% after Tiffany & Co. launches exclusive NFT collection

Interestingly, once addresses are claimed by people who have signed up, there will be significantly more owners of the single CryptoPunk on the Polkadot blockchain than the entire 10,000 original CryptoPunks running on Ethereum.

Unique Network will also fractionalize the ownership of one of its flagship Substrapunk NFTs. Inspired by CryptoPunks, Subtrapunks were the first NFTs to be minted on the Polkadot blockchain. 

Polkadot ‘cup and handle’ setup sees DOT price 50% higher by September

DOT could witness an increase in demand after Polkadot’s launch of an intercommunication blockchain tool.

Polkadot (DOT) looks ready to extend its ongoing price recovery due to a classic bullish pattern forming on its daily chart.

DOT paints “cup and handle” pattern

Notably, DOT has been forming a “cup and handle” pattern since mid-June, confirmed by its price crashing and recovering in a rounding, U-shaped trajectory (cup), followed by the development of a trading range on the right-hand side (handle).

DOT/USD daily price chart featuring “cup and handle” breakout setup. Source: TradingView

Cup and handle patterns are typically bullish continuation setups that form during an uptrend. But in rare cases, they appear at the end of a downtrend, leading to a bullish price reversal. As a result, the possibility of DOT continuing its price recovery seems high.

Thus, from the technical perspective, DOT initially eyes a breakout above its cup and handle’s resistance line near $8.50.

A decisive close above the resistance line, i.e., a breakout move accompanied by a rise in volume, could have DOT eye approximately $12 as its upside target by September, up more than 50% from Aug. ‘s price.

Polkadot price breakdown setup

However, DOT’s road to $12 risks exhaustion due to the presence of key technical resistance levels midway. 

For instance, the Polkadot token could run into its 100-day simple moving average (100-day SMA; the purple wave) near $9.50 only to pull back toward $8.50. This outlook takes cues from DOT’s price retreat on July 31 from the same wave resistance (highlighted by a circle sign below).

DOT/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

Meanwhile, a breakdown below the cup’s curvy support could invalidate the bullish cup and handle setup altogether.

As a result, DOT could risk an extended price correction toward $6.25, which has been serving as support since June 13 against multiple downturns. In other words, DOT could drop by nearly 20% from Aug. 2’s price at most by September.

Polkadot network metrics show stability

Along with the broader market, Polkadot experienced a sharp decline in its market capitalization mainly due to macroeconomic turbulences. As of Aug. 2, the project’s net valuation was $7.92 billion versus its record high of $55.51 billion in November 2021.

In comparison, Polkadot’s network metrics are healthier. For example, it saw 145,000 monthly users in Q2/2022 versus 149,000 monthly users in Q1/2022, according to Messari’s quarterly DOT report in July.

Polkadot account and transfers. Source: Messari/Subscan

Similarly, DOT transfers remained almost the same quarter over quarter, averaging 293 million per month in Q2 versus 288 million in Q1. Interestingly, the peak accounts and transfers’ readings in November 2021 were due to inaugural parachain auctions.

Stable network activity underlines a consistently organic demand for DOT tokens. Nonetheless, it remains substantially down from all-time-highs, meaning Polkadot would need to do more to attract new projects for its parachain-enabled network.

XCM launch and grant

Nicholas Garcia, a researcher at Messari, says that Polkadot could gain more adoption with its Cross-Consensus Message Format (XCM). This recently-launched tool allows parachains to relay messages to one another.

Related: Polkadot’s founder announces steps toward full decentralization with new governance model

“Developing new functionality and use cases will showcase the power of the network and may reignite user interest and activity,” Garcia noted, adding:

“Polkadot must continue onboarding parachains and connecting them with XCM.”

The Web3 Foundation, which oversees grants on Polkadot, approved 415 projects in late July, ranging from development tooling and wallets to smart contracts and user interface development. The move ensures further potential demand for DOT.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Battle-hardened Ronin bridge reopens following $600M hack: Finance Redefined

While price volatility remained a key factor, major DeFi tokens registered double digit loss over the past week as the DeFi TVL hovers near $50 billion mark.

Welcome to Finance Redefined, your weekly dose of key decentralized finance (DeFi) insights, a newsletter crafted to bring you some of the major developments over the last week.

This past week, the DeFi ecosystem saw Axie Infinity’s Ronin bridge relaunch with a fully backed 1:1 Ether (ETH) nearly three months after the infamous $600 million hacks.

MakerDAO plans to invest $500 million into United States Treasurys and bonds to weather the ongoing bear market. Polkadot (DOT) announced that they would transform their governance model to move towards complete decentralization. While decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are seen as the future of governance, a recent study shows less than 1% of all holders have 90% of the voting power in DAOs.

The top 100 DeFi tokens again plunged into a sea of red after showing some fightback last week. The majority of the top-100 tokens registered double-digit losses over the past week.

Battle-hardened Ronin bridge to Axie reopens following $600M hack

Sky Mavis, developers of the popular play-to-earn (P2E) nonfungible token (NFT) game Axie Infinity (AXS) announced the relaunch of Ronin bridge on Thursday, three months after it was hacked for more than $600 million.

On March 29, 173,600 ETH and 25.5 million USD Coin (USDC) were drained from the bridge after hackers managed to gain access to private validator keys. The hack was worth more than $620 million at the time.

According to the Tuesday announcement from the Sky Mavis team, the Ronin bridge is back online after three audits (one internal, two external), a new design and full compensation of the users’ stolen assets.

Continue reading

MakerDAO looks to invest $500M into ‘minimal risk’ Treasurys and bonds

MakerDAO is currently voting on a proposal aimed at helping it weather the bear market and utilize untapped reserves by investing 500 million Dai (DAI) stablecoins into a combination of United States Treasurs and bonds.

Following a straw poll in a governance Signal Request, the DAO members now must decide whether the dormant DAI should go entirely into short-term Treasurys or split 80% into Treasurys and 20% into corporate bonds.

Continue reading

Polkadot’s founder announces steps toward full decentralization with new governance model

Polkadot and Kusama founder Gavin Wood announced that the blockchain’s governance model would undergo a new transformation. Dubbed Gov2, anyone would be able to start a referendum at any time for as many times as they wish in the new setup, similar to initiating new transactions on the blockchain.

Thereafter, the pending referendums need 50% of the vote from stakeholders within 28 days’ time for approval or face rejection by default. Participants can also intervene and launch timely cancellation proposals, which require similar voting procedures in the event that technical glitches are discovered within the referendums themselves.

Continue reading

Less than 1% of all holders have 90% of the voting power in DAOs: Report

A recent report from Chainalysis analyzed the workings of ten major DAO projects and found that, on average, less than 1% of all holders have 90% of the voting power. The finding highlights a high concentration of decision-making power in the hands of a selected few — an issue DAOs were created to resolve.

This concentration of decision-making power was evident with the Solana (SOL)-based lending DAO Solend. The Solend team tried to take over a whale’s account and execute the liquidation themselves via over-the-counter (OTC) desks to avoid cascading liquidations across the decentralized exchange (DEX) books.

Continue reading

DeFi market overview

Analytical data reveals that DeFi’s total value locked registered a minor dip from the past week, falling to a value of $54 billion. Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows that DeFi’s top-100 tokens by market capitalization showed high price volatility and the majority of them traded in red over the past week.

Compound (COMP) was the only DeFi token in the top 100 to register a weekly green with a 2% surge over the past week. The rest of all other DeFi tokens in the top 100 showed an overall bearish momentum dipping in double digits.

Thanks for reading our summary of this week’s most impactful DeFi developments. Join us next Friday for more stories, insights and education in this dynamically advancing space.

Polkadot’s founder announces steps toward full decentralization with new governance model

Gavin Wood said that he seeks to transform the Polkadot blockchain into a full technocracy.

Live from Polkadot Decoded in Buenos Aires on Wednesday, Polkadot (DOT) and Kusama founder Gavin Wood announced that the blockchain’s governance model would undergo a new transformation. Dubbed Gov2, anyone would be able to start a referendum at any time for as many times as they wish in the new setup, similar to initiating new transactions on the blockchain.

Thereafter, pending referenda need 50% of the vote from stakeholders within 28 days’ time for approval or face rejection by default. Participants can also intervene and launch timely cancellation proposals, which require similar voting procedures, in the event that technical glitches are discovered within the referenda, themselves. Passive voters, t can specify a different delegate for every class of referendum in the system in a process known as multirole delegation.

Wood said there will be a new body, dubbed the Polkadot Fellowship, composed of technical experts who have the power to shorten referenda voting times in the event of time-sensitive matters. Overall, several tenets would remain invariant from the previous governance model. First, 50% of the total stake in the system will be allowed to command the system’s future. Greater weight will also be given to those willing to lock their tokens in the system for a longer durationin a process known as conviction voting. Finally, a committee will also remain to oversee the blockchain’s technocratic developments.

As told by Gavin, the changes will reflect the flaws of centralization and one referendum at a time voting system present in Polkadot’s original governance model. Gov2 is set to launch on Kusama imminently, following afinal professional audit of its code. Once tested on Kusama, a proposal will be made to bridge it to Polkadot.

DeFi protocols launch stablecoins to lure new users and liquidity, but does it work?

In the wake of UST’s collapse, several DeFi platforms launched their own stablecoins to lasso new users and liquidity but are investors willing to take on the risk in return for 20% APY?

Stablecoin projects have been thrust into the limelight over the past month as the popularity of algorithmic stablecoins and the collapse of the Terra project put a spotlight on the important role dollar-pegged assets play in the crypto market.

In response to the void left by UST, multiple protocols have released new stablecoin projects in an effort to attract new users and capture liquidity. Generally speaking, the DeFi sector is full of gimmicks that are designed to entice user participation and it’s possible that the recent stablecoin launch programs are simply the next trending tactic being used to boost TVL on DeFi platforms. 

Let’s take a look at some of the newest stablecoins to hit the market and what impact they may or may not be having within DeFi.

USDD

One of the biggest stablecoin projects to launch recently is USDD, a decentralized algorithmic stablecoin on the Tron (TRX) blockchain. Since launching on May 5, USDD has experienced rapid growth in terms of its circulating supply, which currently sits near 601.86 million and its integration within the Tron ecosystem is relatively widespread.

USDD market cap growth. Source: CoinGecko

USDD is also available on the Ethereum (ETH) network and the BNB Smart Chain (BSC), which has helped to increase the tokens distribution along with providing additional yield opportunities.

There are multiple liquidity provider pools available to USDD holders that offer 20% APY or more across various protocols, including JustLend, SunSwap, Ellipsis and Curve. In the time since USDD launched, the price of TRX has increased 17% from $0.07 to its current price of $0.0818 after briefly hitting a high of $0.092 on May 31.

fUSD

Fantom recently released fUSD, its first native stablecoin, which is an over-collateralized and can be minted using Fantom (FTM), USD Coin (USDC), Dai (DAI), SpiritSwap (SPIRIT) and wrapped Tether (fUSDT) as collateral.

In an effort to attract more liquidity, the Fantom Foundation set the fUSD staking reward at 11.3% and created a fUSD to USDC swap interface that allows users to purchase fUSD and repay their positions to avoid liquidations.

At the time of writing, the circulating supply of fUSD stands at 60,993,403 and it is trading at a price of $0.7112, which is significantly below its $1 peg.

aUSD

Following the official launch of the first parachains within the Polkadot ecosystem, the Acala decentralized finance platform released aUSD as the first native stablecoin for Polkadot projects.

aUSD is an over-collateralized stablecoin that can be minted by pledging Polkadot (DOT), staked Polkadot (LDOT), Kusama (KSM), staked KSM (LKSM), Acala (ACA) or Karura (KAR) as collateral.

Pledging LDOT and LKSM as collateral allows DOT and KSM holders to continue earning staking rewards while simultaneously being able to borrow collateral against their holdings.

On March 23, Acala joined with nine other parachain teams to launch a $250 million “aUSD Ecosystem Fund” that is designed to support early-stage startups planning to build strong stablecoin use cases on any Polkadot or Kusama parachain.

As of May 31, 6.31 million aUSD have been minted and the amount of pledged capital locked on Acala stands at $91.53 million.

Related: UK government proposes additional safeguards against stablecoin failure risks

OUSD

Origin protocol’s OUSD is a stablecoin that is fully backed by more recognizable stablecoins like USDC, USDT and DAI.

OUSD market cap growth. Source: CoinGecko

Users can mint OUSD by pledging their stablecoin collateral on the Origin Dollar protocol and earn a yield of 12.79% by holding OUSD in a wallet. Yields that are paid to OUSD holders come from automated strategies managed by smart contracts that put the deposited funds to work in DeFi.

After briefly dropping to a low of $0.967 on May 12 during the height of the UST fallout, OUSD has, for the most part, maintained a price above $0.996 and has a current circulating supply of 63,605,444.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.