nodes

Downsides of Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake, explained

Not all consensus mechanisms are born equal — and the differences between major blockchains can have a huge effect on gas fees and transaction speeds.

How exactly does Eurus work?

This is a Layer 1 blockchain that is based on sidechain technology — by using an interoperable bridge protocol able to connect the Eurus mainnet with Ethereum or other networks.  

The founders of Eurus say their goal is to deliver faster crypto transactions and payments, ensure major blockchains can communicate with one another, and tackle some of the common pitfalls that have been identified with major networks — slow transaction speeds and high gas fees among them. 

This is set to be crucial in tackling the big hurdles surrounding the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies, all while giving the public a way to get involved in a passionate community that’s fair and transparent.

 

How can PPoC benefit everyday users?

Beyond staking, blockchains that use PPoC can make using cryptocurrencies as an everyday payment method far more practical. 

It can be frustrating when you have to wait for multiple confirmations before you receive funds on Proof-of-Work blockchains — not least because the sheer volatility of crypto means that the value of this transaction can change dramatically over this short time period.

And whenever a transaction needs to be made urgently, paying the right gas fee can be a guessing game. Too little, and miners may leave your transaction sitting in a mempool so they can focus on more profitable ones. Too much, and you’re throwing away capital by spending over the odds.

Blockchain networks that use PPoC, such as Eurus, help tackle both of these downsides by ensuring transactions can be confirmed within two seconds — and there are no miners’ threshold factors that need to be taken into account. Other perks include the freedom to complete cross-chain transactions, and a cutting-edge block search engine that delivers much-needed transparency.

What are the hurdles that currently stand in the way of validating transactions?

Wherever you’re involved in PoW or PoS, the barriers to entry can be pretty high.

As we mentioned earlier, becoming a profitable Bitcoin miner is far from easy. There’s staunch competition from giant farms with vast resources, and getting your hands on the latest equipment can be pretty expensive. What’s more, with the cost of electricity rising in many parts of the world, and block rewards halving every four years, there’s a real danger you could end up spending more money than you make. 

Proof-of-Stake throws up a different set of challenges. Ethereum’s new network requires validator nodes to stake 32 ETH — and given how this is worth tens of thousands of dollars, this is an investment that’ll be out of reach of many typical consumers. These funds can also be slashed if technical issues inadvertently mean you act against the network’s best interests. While it is possible to gain exposure to staking rewards for less, this means placing your trust in centralized providers.

But there can be other approaches. Some blockchain networks offer a blend of masternodes held by authorized organizations, and validator nodes that are shared between all wallet users. Here, their interests are protected through a node representative verified through the PPoC mechanism. A big benefit here lies in how everyday users won’t have to worry about the technical intricacies of keeping a blockchain running smoothly, but they’ll still be incentivized to stake.

 

How efficient are these consensus mechanisms?

There are a few ways of measuring this: Gas fees, block confirmation times, and scalability.

Each of these three factors have a crucial role to play in a blockchain’s success. Proof-of-Work blockchains often see gas fees spike whenever there’s a bull market, meaning that it costs more for a transaction to be processed in a timely fashion.

Conventionally, blocks in PoW can take up to 10 minutes to be finalized — but this can vary depending on mining difficulty. According to Ethereum, PoS offers a greater degree of certainty and a set tempo, with a validator being randomly chosen to create a new block every 12 seconds.

With both of these blockchains, there can be fears that those with the most hardware to dedicate to mining — or the highest amount of crypto staked — can end up dominating the block rewards. PPoC mechanisms help address this by mining blocks every two seconds, with every node being rewarded evenly. In theory, this means every participant is steadily incentivized for the contribution they’re making to the network.

 

What are the main types of nodes in existence?

Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake are arguably the best-known consensus mechanisms — but new ones are continually emerging.

PoW blockchains have long dominated the cryptocurrency landscape, with both Bitcoin and Ethereum using this model. This means miners are responsible for securing the network and validating transactions — and they get rewarded with new coins as a result.

However, a common criticism surrounding Proof-of-Work relates to how much energy it uses, and the impact such blockchains have on the environment. Miners need to use vast amounts of computing power to solve arbitrary mathematical equations. More advanced hardware has been required as the industry matured, with electricity usage surging too. 

This has led Proof-of-Stake to be regarded as a more eco-friendly approach. Miners are replaced by validators — nodes that have a financial stake in the smooth running of the network. While proponents claim this can use 99% less energy than PoW, some fear PoS can lead to greater levels of centralization and censorship. Ethereum is currently in the process of moving to this consensus mechanism during The Merge — and it’ll be interesting to see how this high-stakes experiment pans out.

A new approach is known as Published Proof-of-Contribution, otherwise known as PPoC for short. Here, every single participant has a role to play in ensuring the ecosystem is decentralized, democratic and well-governed.

 

Hetzner anti-crypto policies: A wake-up call for Ethereum’s future

The terms of services, laid down by Ethereum’s second-biggest host Hetzner, prohibits customers from running nodes, mining and farming, plotting, storage of blockchain data and trading.

Just when the Ethereum ecosystem reached its final stages in preparing for the much-anticipated upgrade, The Merge, german cloud provider Hetzner, reiterated its stance against allowing mining operations for both proof-of-stake (PoS) and proof-of-work (PoW) applications.

Hetzner, a private, centralized cloud provider, stepped in on a discussion around running blockchain nodes, highlighting its terms of services that prohibit customers from using the services for crypto activities. However, the Ethereum community perceived the revelation as a threat to the ecosystem as Hetzner’s cloud services host nearly 16% of the Ethereum nodes, as shown below.

Ethereum Mainnet Statistics. Source: ethernodes.org

In crypto, the reliance on centralized service providers has been historically perceived as a negative trait when it comes to long-term sustenance — and for a good reason. Redditor u/Supermann- questioned the anti-crypto policies laid down by the second biggest Ethereum Mainnet host, Hetzner. Clarifying the doubts and legal implications associated with using its services for crypto activities, Hetzner stated:

“Using our products for any application related to mining, even remotely related, is not permitted. This includes Ethereum.”

The company also stated that the non-allowance extends to running nodes, mining and farming, plotting, storage of blockchain data and trading. While acknowledging the extensive use of its services for powering Ethereum, Hetzner revealed that “we have been internally discussing how we can best address this issue.” As a fair warning to the community, Hetzner added:

“If you, or any other potential customers are unsure about whether your use case will violate our ToS, please reach out to us.”

The latest revelation from german cloud provider Hetzner showcases the impact of the decision made by centralized entities on thriving crypto ecosystems.

The majority of the Ethereum ecosystem currently runs on Amazon.com, which hosts 54% of the total Ethereum nodes. Some of the mainstream cloud providers that currently host Ethereum nodes include Oracle Cloud (4.1%), Alibaba (2.8%) and Google Cloud (2.7%).

Related: Ethereum Foundation clarifies that the upcoming Merge upgrade will not reduce gas fees

Discussions around the Ethereum upgrade have unknowingly spurred numerous misconceptions about what it means for the future of the blockchain. Cointelegraph’s report highlighted the top five misconceptions about the anticipated Ethereum upgrade.

Reduced gas fees and faster transactions are the biggest rumors spreading across the ecosystem, which have been confirmed to be untrue. However, a subsequent upgrade, named the Shanghai upgrade, will deliver faster and cheaper transactions.

Ethereum dev addresses node centralization concerns in runup to the Merge

A majority of 4,653 active Ethereum nodes are being run through centralized web providers like Amazon Web Services, which experts believe could become a central point of failure.

Ethereum is a few weeks away from officially moving to a proof-of-stake (PoS) mining consensus from its current proof-of-work (PoW) one. The transition, officially dubbed the Merge, is slated for Sept. 15, but in the run-up to the major upgrade, Ethereum node centralization has become a hot topic.

As Cointelegraph reported last week, the majority of 4,653 active Ethereum nodes are being run through centralized web providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS), which experts believe could expose the Ethereum blockchain to the central point of failure post Merge.

Distribution of Ethereum nodes from web service providers. Source: Ethernodes

The same concern was put forward by Maggie Love, co-founder of Web3 infrastructure firm W3BCloud. She claimed that the centralization of nodes in the Ethereum PoS network could become a big concern that nobody seems to be focusing on.

Ethereum lead developer Péter Szilágyi addressed the mounting centralization concerns and claimed that they have been aiming to prune the database since Devcon IV. Pruning refers to reducing the size of the blockchain to a point where developers can create a reliable registry with a certain size.

Szilágyi added that the idea received heavy backlash at the time and the current centralization in nodes is a direct result of that. He explained that the Ethereum state needs to be a constant size for people to be able to run their own nodes.

Related: ETH whales move holdings onto exchanges before Merge

Ethereum state refers to a large data structure that holds not only all accounts and balances but a machine state, which can change from block to block according to a pre-defined set of rules. Szilágyi explained:

“Ethereum state needs to be ‘constant‘ in size. That way it can run forever. The constant can be pushed up like the block gas limit if need be, but it mustn’t grow unbounded. Until that’s solved, there’s no light at the end of the tunnel.”

He noted that active efforts are being made by several parties to resolve the issue, however, in the meantime, the common public shouldn’t be blamed for “not wanting to maintain an ever larger ‘infrastructure’ for running a node.”

At present, the cost of running an individual node is very high, something that crypto analytic firm Mesari flagged in its report. Due to such infrastructure costs, people often turn to cloud infrastructure service providers such as AWS. However, high centralization could prove to be a vulnerability in the long term.

Bitty Kitty: Cat spoils Bitcoin node during price crash with ‘dirty protest’

The story of one Bitcoiner’s cat that sought to disrupt the decentralized network with a “dirty protest.”

A Bitcoin node is a pivotal piece of the Bitcoin (BTC) protocol. For bad actors, attacking nodes and bringing them offline is a sound strategy to undermine the network’s resilience. For one British Bitcoiner, such an attack took place, as the actions of his feline friend rendered his Bitcoin node “unreachable.”

Bodl_hodler (who wishes to remain anonymous) told Cointelegraph that he “started running Raspberry Pi as Umbrel node January 2021,” as he wished to contribute to the overall decentralization of the Bitcoin network.

Below is a picture of node in question before the attack. Notice the air vents on the node —a crucial element of the saga.

Bodl’s Bitcoin node. Source: @Bodl_Hodl

The node ran smoothly since connection, confirming Bitcoin blocks on average every 10 minutes as per the difficulty adjustment. However, in late May 2022, when the price began to tumble under $30,000, Bodl “Went to log into the node for the first time in a while and it couldn’t be found on the network.”

“So I pulled it out from behind the sofa only to discover it was covered with a crusty layer of baked on cat sick.”

To his horror, Bodl discovered that his large black cat, Pablo, had vomited on the Bitcoin node. The “dirty protest” had affected the node’s ability to connect to the internet and run. Bodl explains, “The vomit got through the vent slots and took the node offline.”

Pablo the Bitcoin node attacker and cat. Source: Bodl

Indeed, if a Bitcoin node goes offline, it no longer contributes to the security of the network, potentially jeopardizing the Bitcoin protocol. Bodl jokes that “Maybe he [Pablo] mistakenly thought it was running a dog-themed shitcoin,” and “couldn’t stomach the volatility.” Bodl is a Bitcoin maximalist who has no time for the likes of Dogecoin (DOGE).

Related: Brazil beams Bitcoin from space: A case for BTC satellite nodes

Fortunately, it is also very easy to turn the node back on and to catch on the missing blocks. Bodl said he “removed the power, plugged it back in again, luckily it powered on fine and took a few minutes to re-sync to add all the blocks that it had missed.”

The node was immediately brought back to life, confirming transactions and securing the network. “Tick tock, next block,” has become a popular catchphrase among node runners due to the regularity of the Bitcoin blocks.

Incidentally, running a BTC node is increasingly easy and allows Bitcoin users to easily verify their transactions. Bitcoin hobbyists can now run Lightning nodes while some hope to earn passive income along the way. As for Pablo, he now has the company of a new kitten called Lottie who has recently joined the Bodl family.

Brazil beams Bitcoin from space: A case for BTC satellite nodes

Bitcoin’s blast off to becoming “space money” takes one giant leap with a satellite full node in Brazil.

A Bitcoiner in Brazil has beamed the blockchain from space. Alessandro Cecere, product manager at Ledn and a Venezuelan national, has established the purported first Bitcoin (BTC) satellite full node in Brazil. 

The full satellite node that Cecere has established downloads the Bitcoin blockchain directly from the Blockstream Satellite Network, negating the need for a reliable internet connection. It’s a small step for Bitcoin’s web of nodes but a giant leap for Bitcoin adoption, evincing that those in remote or hard-to-reach areas could run nodes.

Cecere poses with the satellite dish that receives the Bitcoin blockchain. Source: Cecere

A refresher for those new to nodes: A Bitcoin full node is software that continuously monitors the blockchain and its complete transaction history. A full node prohibits non-legitimate transactions and thwarts attempts to spend Bitcoin twice, known as a “double-spend.” Cecere explains that nodes “grant their owners decentralized access to the only uncensorable monetary network that we know of today.”

However, up until 2020, configuring a Bitcoin node (sometimes called a Bitcoin peer, as Bitcoin is a “peer-to-peer version of electronic cash”) was wholly dependent on local internet providers. Thanks to upgrades in Bitcoin company Blockstream’s Satellite Network, Bitcoin believers around the world can download a full node without an internet connection.

The satellite receiver from novra technologies. Source: Cecere

But, why does it matter? As Cecere explains: “Satellite Full Nodes are the next step to further decentralization of the Bitcoin network,” adding:

“The use case for Satellite Full Nodes could not be brighter. A few offline access points of these can fully connect remote communities to Bitcoin, even ones without prior internet access.”

There is a compelling case for satellite full nodes, particularly in countries that struggle with unstable governments, unreliable internet connections and weak digital infrastructure. In effect, a satellite full node can help more emerging countries and individuals without internet connections contribute and eventually participate in the Bitcoin network.

Bitcoin Gandalf (not his real name), of Braiins Bitcoin mining company explained to Cointelegraph that “using Blockstream satellite adds an additional level of redundancy should more traditional connectivity methods be interrupted.” 

In neighboring Venezuela, for example, a Bitcoin satellite node was installed in 2020. Venezuela benefits from a robust infrastructure of satellite dish networks, which as Cecere explains, “can be leveraged to expand Bitcoin’s offline signal on earth.”

Cecere connected to a Blockstream satellite from his homeland, after television network provider DirecTV left the country:

“I recycled a dish that DirecTV had installed at my parent’s house more than 10 years ago and turned it into an access point to the most powerful monetary network on Earth. That’s experiencing the power of borderless money at its utmost in the flesh!”

Venezuela is an increasingly pro-crypto nation, having experienced high levels of inflation since 2016. Across the border in Brazil, it’s another hotbed for adoption, particularly in light of a new bill that proposes protections for private keys as well as the legalization of crypto payments. The ability to run a satellite node in these countries as an offline connection point is a boon for adoption and the network’s resilience.

For Cecere’s satellite node in Venezuela, he “modernized`“ the dish with a clothes pin to assist the download of the blockchain. Source: Cecere

The Brazilian satellite full node Cessere built is connecting from a family member’s house in Santos, just south of Brazil’s largest city São Paulo . If the node runs successfully, the intention is to “port the equiment to Fundação Parque Tecnológico de Santos Gustavo,” a technology and innovation park where it will remain permanently connected as an offline connection point.   

Related: Bitcoin Lightning Network developer updates node software with Taproot support

However, the Bitcoin space signal has some limitations. Cecere explains it’s a “one-way street, since one can only download data from it but not push any; hence, they’re not capable of broadcasting transactions to the network.”

In the future, Blockstream may introduce an even more advanced version of their satellite equipment that may enable those with extremely limited access to internet access — such as crypto mining companies in far-flung destinations — to connect to Bitcoin.

Then, and only then will Bitcoin take on the mantle of being “space money.”

Ankr partners with Optimism to provide a fast and reliable RPC service for users

Ankr also said that it will incentivize independent Optimism node operators to add their nodes to the load balancer in return for ANKR tokens.

Ankr, a company that provides one-click node deployment and Web3 infrastructure, has announced that it will become a remote procedure call provider for Optimism.

Optimism is an open-source layer-2 scaling solution for Ethereum that focuses on speed and efficient transactions across the network. It has caught the eyes of many in recent months, including Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin.

Ankr has assisted many industry leaders such as Solana and Avalanche by running their blockchains faster, allowing for better Web3 experiences across the globe. Matthew Slipper, head of engineering of OP Labs, stated:

“Adding Ankr as an infrastructure provider helped fulfill the desires of our community members who want to build with robust and reliable services. Apps and integrations choose to build in our ecosystem because they feel aligned with our values and appreciate the breadth of tooling and technical options available to them.”

This partnership will allow decentalized application (DApp) developers from all parts of the world access to Optimism’s public and premium RPCs. “We love what Optimism is building for the future of Ethereum. Ankr is happy to do our part to provide a fast and reliable RPC service for their users,” said Greg Gopman, chief marketing officer of Ankr.

Ankr also said that it will incentivize independent Optimism node operators to add their nodes to the load balancer in return for ANKR tokens.

Back in November 2021, Ankr Network co-founder and CEO Chandler Song wrote about multichain technology as a necessity for the future of decentralized finance (DeFi) products. At the time, he said that projects that support multiple chains gain larger audiences and increase their liquidity:

“This means that at a minimum, your DeFi product needs to support Ethereum and a “niche” blockchain — there are established leaders for trading, staking, nonfungible tokens (NFTs) and more. And the more chains with which you can interact, the better.”