Lending

DeFi lender Tender.fi suffers exploit, white hat hacker suspected

DeFi lending platform Tender.fi sees $1.59 million of assets drained by an alleged white hat hacker taking advantage of a misconfigured oracle.

An alleged ethical hacker has drained $1.59 million from the decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platform Tender.fi, leading the service to halt borrowing while it attempts to recoup its assets.

Web3-focused smart contract auditor CertiK, and blockchain analyst Lookonchain, flagged an exploit that saw funds drained from the DeFi lending protocol on March 7. Tender.fi confirmed the incident on Twitter, citing “an unusual amount of borrows” through the protocol:

The latest update from the platform claims that a white hat hacker has made contact, and discussions are underway to recoup assets taken during the exploit. White hat hackers are also known as ethical hackers and typically look for and take advantage of security flaws in different protocols before returning funds.

Cointelegraph reached out to CertiK to unpack the situation, which highlighted that the exploiter left an on-chain message which has been verified on the Arbitrum Blockchain Explorer:

The input data reads: “It looks like your oracle was misconfigured. contact me to sort this out.”

Lookonchain provided further details of the exploit, citing blockchain data showing that the white hat hacker borrowed $1.59 million worth of assets from the protocol by depositing 1 GMX token, valued at $71 at the time of writing.

Related: $700,000 drained from BNB Chain-based DeFi protocol LaunchZone

Cointelegraph has reached out to Tender.fi to ascertain further details of the exploit and whether funds will be returned by the white hat hacker. DeFi protocols have been the target of hackers in early 2023, with seven different platforms losing over $21 million in February alone. Hackers also took advantage of an oracle exploit in Jan. 2023, seeing over $120 million stolen from BonqDAO. 

Babel wants to repay creditors via special ‘recovery coins’: Report

Babel reportedly owes $524 million worth of Bitcoin, Ether and other cryptocurrencies due to “risky trading activities” by co-founder Wang Li.

Babel Finance, one of many cryptocurrency lending firms shaken by the bear market of 2022, is exploring new restructuring opportunities involving minting a new token.

Babel co-founder Yang Zhou is planning to build a new decentralized finance (DeFi) project in order to generate revenue to repay debts owed to creditors, Bloomberg reported on March 5.

The potential DeFi project, called Hope, aims to mint a new stablecoin to serve as a “recovery coin” for Babel, according to Yang’s restructuring proposal.

Unlike major stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC), Hope’s namesake stablecoin will reportedly use Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) as collateral, maintaining its 1:1 ratio with the U.S. dollar through arbitrage incentives for traders, the filing notes.

The document also alleges that another Babel co-founder, Wang Li, was responsible for the losses, stipulating that “the risky trading activities appear to have been instructed solely by Wang.” Wang stepped down from his CEO position at Babel in December amid the company’s issues.

According to Babel’s estimations, the company owes customers as much as $524 million worth of BTC, ETH and other cryptocurrencies due to losses allegedly caused by Wang’s risky trading activities. Another $224 million was reportedly lost when Babel counterparties liquidated collateral after the firm could not meet a large volume of margin calls.

As previously reported, Babel was one of several crypto lenders that experienced serious liquidity issues due to the cryptocurrency winter in 2022. The Hong Kong-based firm suspended withdrawals and redemptions from its products in June, citing “unusual liquidity pressures.”

Related: Hodlnaut founders propose selling the firm instead of liquidation

Several prominent industry lenders — including Voyager Digital, Celsius Network, Genesis Global and Hodlnaut — have faced similar issues. Genesis owes $150 million to Babel, its third-biggest named creditor, according to a January Chapter 11 filing. All of these companies are now working hard to come up with restructuring plans to pay their creditors and save their businesses.

In late February, Voyager customers voted for a restructuring plan that included Binance’s United States-based business, Binance.US, acquiring Voyager’s assets.

Bitcoin leverage ramps up as BTC’s margin long-to-shorts ratio hits a record $2.5B high

BTC traders at Bitfinex and OKX are unwilling to use margin markets for bearish bets, creating an alarming imbalance that investors should pay close attention to.

Crypto traders’ urge to create leverage positions with Bitcoin (BTC) appears irresistible to many people, but it’s impossible to know if these traders are extreme risk-takers or savvy market-makers hedging their positions. The need to maintain hedges holds even if traders rely on leverage merely to reduce their counterparty exposure by maintaining a collateral deposit and the bulk of their position on cold wallets.

Not all leverage is reckless

Regardless of the reason for traders’ use of leverage, currently there is a highly unusual imbalance in margin lending markets that favors BTC longs betting on a price increase. Despite this, so far, the movement has been restricted on margin markets because the BTC futures markets remained relatively calm throughout 2023.

Margin markets operate differently from futures contracts in two main areas. Those are not derivatives contracts, meaning the trade happens on the same order book as regular spot trading and, unlike futures contracts, the balance between margin longs and shorts is not always matched.

For instance, after buying 20 Bitcoin using margin, one can literally withdraw the coins from the exchange. Of course, there must be some form of collateral, or a margin deposit, for the trade, and this is usually based on stablecoins. If the borrower fails to return the position, the exchange will automatically liquidate the margin to repay the lender.

The borrower must also pay an interest rate for the BTC bought with margin. The operational procedures will vary between marketplaces held by centralized and decentralized exchanges, but usually the lender gets to decide the rate and duration of the offers.

Margin traders can either long or short

Margin trading allows investors to leverage their positions by borrowing stablecoins and using the proceeds to buy more cryptocurrency. When these traders borrow Bitcoin, they use the coins as collateral for short positions, which means they are betting on a price decrease.

That is why analysts monitor the total lending amounts of Bitcoin and stablecoins to understand whether investors are leaning bullish or bearish. Interestingly, Bitfinex margin traders entered their highest leverage long/short ratio on Feb. 26.

Bitfinex margin Bitcoin longs/shorts ratio. Source: TradingView

Historically, Bitfinex margin traders are known for creating margin positions of 10,000 BTC or higher quickly, indicating the participation of whales and large arbitrage desks.

As the above chart indicates, on Feb. 26, the BTC/USD long (bulls) margin demand outpaced shorts (bears) by 133 times, at 105,300 BTC. Before 2023, the last time this indicator reached an all-time high favoring longs was Sept. 12, 2022. Unfortunately, for bulls, the result benefited bears as Bitcoin nosedived 19% over the following six days.

Traders should cross-reference the data with other exchanges to ensure the anomaly is market-wide, especially since each marketplace holds different risks, norms, liquidity and availability.

OKX, for instance, provides a margin lending indicator based on the stablecoin/BTC ratio. At OKX, traders can increase exposure by borrowing stablecoins to buy Bitcoin. On the other hand, Bitcoin borrowers can only bet on the decline of a cryptocurrency’s price.

OKX stablecoin/BTC margin lending ratio. Source: OKX

The above chart shows that OKX traders’ margin lending ratio increased through February, signaling that professional traders added leveraged long positions even as Bitcoin price failed to break the $25,000 resistance multiple times between Feb. 16 and Feb. 23.

Furthermore, the margin ratio at OKX on Feb. 22 was the highest level seen in over six months. This level is highly unusual and matches the trend seen at Bitfinex where a strong imbalance favored Bitcoin margin longs.

Related: Can Bitcoin reach $25K again in March 2023? Watch Market Talks live

The difference in the cost of leverage could explain the imbalance

The rate for leverage BTC longs at Bitfinex has been almost nonexistent throughout 2023, currently sitting below 0.1% per year. In short, traders should not panic, considering the cost of margin lending remains in a zone that is deemed healthy, and the imbalance is not present in futures contracts markets.

There may be a plausible explanation for the movement, which did not happen overnight. For instance, a possible culprit is the rising cost of stablecoin lending.

Instead of the minimal rate offered for Bitcoin loans, stablecoin borrowers pay 25% per year on Bitfinex. That cost increased significantly in November 2022 when the leading derivatives exchange FTX and their market-maker, Alameda Research, blew up.

As long as Bitcoin margin markets remain extremely unbalanced, traders should continue monitoring the data for additional signs of stress. Currently, no red flags are raised, but the size of the Bitfinex BTC/USD longs ($2.5 billion position) should be a reason for concern.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors’ alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Hodlnaut founders propose selling the firm instead of liquidation

Despite Hodlnaut’s creditors insisting on the firm’s liquidation, the founders keep trying to save the business and sell it to potential investors.

The founders of the troubled cryptocurrency lender Hodlnaut are trying to save the business despite creditors insisting on its liquidation.

On Feb. 28, Hodlnaut’s interim judicial managers released the sixth affidavit of Hodlnaut co-founder Simon Lee, reportedly stating the company’s founders proposed selling the business as a better option for creditors than liquidating the firm.

According to a report by Bloomberg, Lee said that he and Hodlnaut’s other co-founder Zhu Juntao have reached out to several “potential white knight investors.”

Lee reportedly wrote that Hodlnaut co-founders are confident the company’s user base “can be acquired and on-boarded on digital-asset platforms owned or affiliated to such investors.” He declared that such a business transaction would “maximize” value for creditors.

The affidavit further reaffirms Hodlnaut’s willingness to sell the firm as the company worked with several potential investors to sell its business and other assets. A number of potential buyers reportedly inquired about purchasing Hodlnaut and its claims against the collapsed crypto exchange FTX as of early February.

The news comes shortly after key Hodlnaut creditors, including Algorand Foundation, in January rejected a restructuring plan offer allowing the current directors to oversee the firm’s operations during the restructuring phase. The creditors argued that the restructuring would do no help and it was in their best interest to liquidate the firm’s remaining assets.

Related: DCG losses top $1B on the back of 3AC collapse in 2022

As of December 2022, Hodlnaut Group owed $160.3 million — or 62% of outstanding debt — to companies and entities like Algorand, Samtrade Custodian, S.A.M. FinTech and Jean-Marc Tremeaux.

Once a major crypto lending platform, Hodlnaut was forced to suspend services in August 2022 due to a lack of liquidity triggered by the bear market in 2022. Hodlnaut’s operations were further breached by the firm’s significant exposure to the collapsed FTX exchange, with the firm having more than 500 Bitcoin (BTC) stuck on Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto exchange.

The news comes amid another troubled crypto lender, Voyager Digital, announcing on Feb. 28 that customers voted for a restructuring plan with Binance’s United States-based business, Binance.US. In December 2022, Binance.US disclosed an agreement to buy Voyager’s assets for $1.02 billion.

DeFi ‘fragility’ causes and cures explored in highly technical Bank of Canada study

Researchers affiliated with Canada’s central bank identified weak points in DeFi lending protocols and reported on the potential they saw for mitigating them.

The Bank of Canada has released a working paper that examines lending protocols in decentralized finance with regard to sources of instability and their relation to crypto asset prices. Its findings point to potential ways to optimize DeFi lending platforms, or possibly the practical limits of decentralization.

The authors of the paper, titled “On the Fragility of DeFi Lending” and released Feb. 22, acknowledge the inclusiveness DeFi offers and the advantages of smart contract protocols over the use of human discretion — but they also identify the systemic weaknesses of DeFi. Information asymmetry, a key issue for regulators, is highlighted, with the twist that in DeFi, the asymmetry favors the borrower:

“The collateral composition of a lending pool is not readily observable, implying that borrowers are better informed about collateral quality than lenders are.”

This is because borrowers are at least aware of the quality of the assets they used as loan collateral. Moreover, “Only tokenized assets can be pledged as collateral, and such assets tend to exhibit very high price volatilities.” Price and liquidity produce a feedback loop, the paper argues, saying that the price of an asset affects borrowing volume, which, in turn, affects asset price.

In addition, smart contracts’ lack of human input can have undesired effects. Traditional loan contracts can be modified by loan officers in response to current information. However, smart contracts are inflexible because terms are preprogrammed and “can only be contingent on a small set of quantifiable, real-time data,” and even minor changes to the contract can require a lengthy discussion process.

“As a result, DeFi lending typically involves linear, non-recourse debt contracts that feature over-collateralization as the only risk control.”

Efficiency, complexity and flexibility are thus reduced in comparison with traditional finance, and “self-fulfilling sentiment-driven cycles” of pricing arise. The authors used advanced mathematics to examine a number of propositions for achieving market equilibrium in those circumstances.

Related: Bank of Canada emphasizes need for stablecoin regulation as legislation is tabled

A flexible optimal debt limit was found to provide equilibrium. However, “simple linear haircut rules” typically designed into smart contracts cannot implement a flexible limit. It would be hard to create protocols with that feature, and they would be highly dependent on the choice of oracles. Alternatively to that challenge, “DeFi lending could abandon complete decentralization and re-introduce human intervention to provide real-time risk management.”

Thus, the authors conclude, the DeFi trilemma of decentralization, simplicity and stability remains unconquered.


Platypus to work on compensation plan after $8.5M attack

According to the DeFi protocol, different parties, including legal enforcement officials, are currently involved in the funds’ recovery process.

Decentralized finance (DeFi) firm Platypus is working on a compensation plan for users’ losses after a flash loan attack drained nearly $8.5 million from the protocol, affecting its stablecoin dollar-peg. 

In a tweet on Feb. 18, Platypus said it was working on a plan to compensate the damages and asked users not to realize their losses in the protocol, saying this would make it harder for the company to manage the issue. Asset liquidations are also paused, said the protocol:

According to the firm, different parties, including legal enforcement officials, are currently involved in the funds’ recovery process. Further details about the next steps will be disclosed soon, noted Platypus. 

Part of the funds are locked up in the Aave protocol. Platypus is exploring a method to potentially recover the funds, which would require the approval of a recovery proposal in Aave’s governance forum.

Blockchain security firm CertiK first reported the flash loan attack on the platform through a tweet on Feb.16, along with the alleged attacker’s contract address. Nearly $8.5 million was moved from the protocol, and as a result, the Platypus USD (USP) stablecoin depegged from the U.S. dollar, dropping to $0.33 at the time of writing.

Platypus USD Price Chart – 7 days. Source: CoinGecko

“The attacker used a flashloan to exploit a logic error in the USP solvency check mechanism in the contract holding the collateral,” said the company. A potential suspect has been identified. 

A technical post-mortem analysis conducted by auditing company Omniscia revealed the attack was made possible by incorrectly placed code after it was audited. Omniscia audited a version of the MasterPlatypusV1 contract from Nov. 21 to Dec. 5, 2021. The version, however, “contained no integration points with an external platypusTreasure system” and therefore did not contain the misordered lines of code.

The flash loan attack exploits the smart contract security of a platform to borrow large amounts of money without collateral. Once a cryptocurrency asset has been manipulated on one exchange, it is quickly sold on another, allowing the exploiter to profit from the price manipulation.

MakerDAO voting on $100M loan participation with Florida commercial bank

Florida’s Cogent Bank is proposing a $100 million participation in loans to MakerDAO’s RWA Master Participation Trust.

Crypto lending platform MakerDAO is voting on a new proposal to bring another commercial bank into its ecosystem, strengthening the connection between decentralized finance (DeFi) and traditional finance. 

As per MakerDAO’s governance forum, Cogent Bank — a Florida-based commercial bank — is proposing to participate with $100 million in loans to MakerDAO’s RWA Master Participation Trust.

The proposal is part of MakerDAO’s monthly governance cycle and seeks the same terms and conditions applied to Pennsylvania-based bank Huntingdon Valley Bank (HVB), which entered into a collateral integration with the crypto firm in July 2022, allowing the bank to borrow against its assets using DeFi.

Under the same conditions, MakerDAO would use its trust arm to link the capital available at Cogent Bank with MakerDAO’s Dai (DAI) stablecoin. The trust entity would be responsible for ensuring DAI minting and destruction from the vault, as well as managing the partnership with the bank.

Cash flow diagram, Maker Vault/Cogent Bank. Source: MakerDAO’s forum

The DeFi protocol would gain exposure to the credit market in at least eight categories, including commercial real estate, industrial, life insurance, consumer and public finance, with loans issued mostly on a fixed-rate basis.

Among the revenue sources for MakerDAO are fees associated with maintaining the vault, minting DAI, and yields. The benchmark 30-day average secured overnight financing rate stood at 4.15% as of Jan. 5.

Before its acquisition in 2018, Cogent Bank was known as Pinnacle Bank. The Florida bank has $1.3 billion of assets under management and is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. According to the company, loans originated in the first three quarters of 2022 totaled $602 million and summed $873 million in 2021.

In a bid to endure the crypto winter in 2022, MakerDAO disclosed a governance process for its first collaboration with a traditional bank, Huntingdon Valley Bank. At that time, the DeFi protocol announced plans to onboard other banks depending on the results of its integration with HVB.

Crypto lender Salt makes comeback with $64.4 million funding

The crypto lender froze withdrawals in mid-November. It will resume operations in Q1 2023, buoyed by a Series A recapitalization.

The crypto winter and FTX collapse have decimated the ranks of cryptocurrency lenders. Genesis, BlockFi, Voyager Digital and Celsius Network all filed for bankruptcy in the past seven months, and the contagion may still not be over. But at least one crypto lender appears to be on the comeback trail.

Salt Lending, one of the world’s first cryptocurrency lenders, announced on Feb. 8 that it had closed a $64.4 million financing round that will strengthen its balance sheet and replenish its capital reserves. Accredited investors will receive shares of the company’s preferred stock in return for their funding. Though the Series A recapitalization effort is still subject to approval by regulatory authorities, it should allow the company to return to full operation in the first quarter.

As reported, the Denver-based Salt Lending announced a “pause” — i.e., a freeze — on withdrawals and deposits to its lending platform in mid-November, shortly after the FTX crash. Like some other crypto firms, Salt had used the Bahamas-based FTX as a source of liquidity for its lending operations. 

“Crypto faced a perfect winter storm in 2022, taking with it significant industry participants like Terraform Labs, Voyager Digital, Celsius Network, Three Arrows Capital, FTX, and BlockFi. Salt was not immune to these market forces, but we are determined to emerge stronger than ever,” Shawn Owen, founder and interim CEO of Salt, said in an announcement on Feb. 8.

While Salt Lending never filed for bankruptcy, its November freeze on withdrawals set off a mini tempest on social media. The firm also lost its California lending license, and a deal to sell the company to Bnk To The Future was jettisoned

The California license remains suspended, though Owen told Cointelegraph in an interview that Salt is working with the state’s regulators to get it restored. “We’re staying as transparent as we can, and we’re educating them on all the details of exactly how the business model works.” But Owen still can’t say at this point if and when the license will be restored. “You can’t guarantee anything because they do have discretion. But we’re doing everything we can to be good actors.”

interview that Salt is working with the state’s regulators to get it restored. “We’re staying as transparent as we can, and we’re educating them on all the details of exactly how the business model works.” But Owen still can’t say at this point if and when the license will be restored. “You can’t guarantee anything because they do have discretion. But we’re doing everything we can to be good actors.”

A Series B funding round in 2023

Salt plans to seek further funding later in 2023 — an anticipated Series B financing in the $100 million size range — to further build out its capital buffer, Owen told Cointelegraph.

FTX’s collapse clearly impacted Salt’s business. “We had accounts on FTX,” said Owen. He was stunned when the Bahamas-based exchange suddenly collapsed. “We felt up until 48 hours before [it crashed] that FTX was another platform that had good liquidity and a good interface and was one of ours.”

Recent: As Bitcoin nears $25K, questions about rally’s sustainability remain

Individuals and businesses can secure fiat loans using Bitcoin (BTC) and other cryptocurrencies as collateral on SALT’s platform, but sometimes borrowers want to pay off their loans and recover their collateral.

Thus, a lender like Salt has to be able to prove that it “can sell collateral pretty much instantaneously at a certain price,” Owen further explained. “And in order to do that, you have to have relationships with buyers — or you have to be the buyer.” Hence the need for further capital.

The November freeze on withdrawals and deposits, Owen said, “was terrifying for our customers. As you’d imagine, some of them had already been locked up and lost money in both Celsius and BlockFi. So they were thinking, ‘This is just another one. Everything’s going down.’”

It took a Herculean effort to calm things down, he suggested: “I’ve literally been working days, nights, weekends for 60-plus days solid, speaking to people directly.” He had a mission “to speak to every one of our customers in person.”

Asked about the firm’s customers, Owen said they were primarily individuals and businesses holding and saving Bitcoin for the long term, as BTC is the predominant value on Salt’s platform. Customers are looking to monetize their crypto “whether it’s for buying real estate, paying bills or whatnot” but they need to have confidence that they can pay off the loan and get their collateral back if they so desire.

Founded in 2016, Salt claims to be the first platform to launch collateralized blockchain-backed loans, though it remains a relatively small player compared with three other firms with which it is often compared: BlockFi, Celsius and Nexo.

But when FTX imploded, Owen said, “it shocked us beyond what we were prepared for” and so “[we] ducked our heads and just said, ‘We don’t know how bad this contagion is. We’d better figure out exactly where this goes.’”

That’s when the firm decided to “basically pause our service” to protect capital, Owen said. “That was something we’d never done before. The business was never planned to be an on-off switch or to be turned on and off.”

More regulation needed?

A lot of other people were surprised and shocked too, of course, and calls were heard almost immediately for the crypto industry to be better regulated. Is regulation something that crypto lenders are just going to have to live with in the coming years?

“In our opinion, the regulation is already here,” Owen said. In the U.S., lenders are required to be licensed on a state-by-state basis. The problem wasn’t an absence of laws or rules. “It was simply that they were not following rules,” according to Owen. Retail customers were encouraged to deposit funds on platforms that were neither banks nor registered securities firms and, in return, were able to earn outsize “yields.” “That clearly was illegal, and we never did that. I don’t think that that will ever be allowed now that the public is well-informed,” Owen said. 

Others believe that all the crypto lending bankruptcies have created a market vacuum, and traditional financial institutions like banks will now rush in to fill the void. Owen’s view?

“I do think that banks will get involved when they can, but I don’t think we’re close to that right now,” he said. Recent events have discouraged their participation. “We’re seeing a lot of pullback.” In fact, many banks today have more appetite for central bank digital currencies than they do for crypto, he believes.

“If you had asked me a year ago, I would have said that banks were probably getting a lot more interested. If you’re asking me today, I would say they’re probably at least three or four years out.”

Beware of counterparty risk

Have any lessons been learned in the past year? “The overarching one is fraud. You have to always watch out for counterparty risk because there are bad actors,” Owen said. But there are some concrete steps that can be taken right now.

“First and foremost, it’s the principle of having collateral to back any kind of loan.” So many of the meltdowns of the past year were the result of unsecured lending, according to Owen. “Lending can be much safer if you’re lending against an asset that’s overcollateralized.”

A second lesson is transparency, he said. “I think a lot of people feel very taken advantage of because they were told one thing and it turned out to be something else.” And a third lesson, he continued, is the need for capital reserves. There’s no FDIC Insurance for crypto, so having sufficient capital reserves is especially important, “which is why we want to ramp up for a large Series B $100 million-plus funding round, because to expand our model, we’re going to require significant capital reserves, much more like a bank.”

Recent: Crypto and psychedelics: Clarifying regulations could help industries grow

The crypto sector isn’t out of the woods yet, but Salt Lending’s interim CEO believes a healthier industry is going to emerge eventually. 

“One thing about Bitcoin and crypto is that it’s ‘antifragile,’ to use a technical term,” he said. It’s used to coming under attack, and each time it emerges more robust than the time before. “I think, right now, it’s no question we’ll come back a lot stronger.”

Owen doesn’t know if the storm is over yet, “though it feels like we’re through the worst of it. But I don’t want to jinx us.”

Hodlnaut works with potential buyers to sell firm and FTX claims: Report

Hodlnaut’s court-appointed judicial managers are reportedly in the process of signing non-disclosure agreements with the potential buyers.

Troubled cryptocurrency lending firm Hodlnaut is reportedly working with several potential investors to sell its business and other assets.

A number of potential buyers have inquired about purchasing Hodlnaut and its claims against the collapsed crypto exchange FTX, Bloomberg reported on Feb. 6.

Hodlnaut’s interim judicial managers have received multiple proposals to acquire its Singapore-based crypto business after the company sought protection from creditors. Citing an affidavit, the report notes that the judicial managers are now in the process of signing non-disclosure agreements with the potential investors.

The affidavit reportedly indicated that as of Dec. 9, 2022, Hodlnaut Group owed a total of $160.3 million — or 62% of outstanding debt — to companies and entities like Algorand Foundation, Samtrade Custodian, S.A.M. Fintech and Jean-Marc Tremeaux.

As previously reported, Hodlnaut’s FTX accounts held 514 Bitcoin (BTC), 1,395 Ether (ETH), 280,348 USD Coin (USDC) tokens and 1,001 FTX (FTT) tokens. The company reportedly had more than $18 million worth of digital assets on centralized exchanges like FTX, Deribit, Binance, OKX and Tokenize.

Once a major crypto lending platform, Hodlnaut was forced to halt operations due to a lack of liquidity triggered by a massive bear market in 2022. After freezing withdrawals in August, Hodlnaut obtained creditor protection from a Singapore court, allowing the firm to restructure under court supervision. The court appointed Ee Meng Yen Angela and Aaron Loh Cheng Lee of EY Corporate Advisors as interim judicial managers.

Related: Celsius publishes list of users eligible to withdraw majority of assets

The news comes weeks after Hodlnaut’s creditors rejected the proposed restructuring plan and sought liquidation of the platform’s assets. Instead, the creditors reportedly called for immediate liquidation and distribution of remaining assets among creditors in order to maximize the remaining value.

Hodlnaut is one of many companies specializing in crypto lending services, allowing users to deposit cryptocurrency lent out to borrowers in return for regular interest payments. The cryptocurrency winter of 2022 has disrupted the operations of crypto lenders, including Celsius Network, BlockFi, Genesis, Vauld and others. A number of industry executives believe that crypto lending can still survive the bear market, but some conditions still need to be met.

Genesis unsecured creditors’ committee appointed

The seven-member committee will represent the creditors in court, having the right to participate in the reorganization plan.

A seven-member committee has been appointed to represent the interests of unsecured creditors in Genesis Global bankruptcy case, according to court filings on Feb. 4. 

The committee will represent the creditors in court, having the right to be consulted before major decisions and to participate in the reorganization plan. Members are generally select from a list of twenty largest unsecured creditors.

Among the chosen members are Mirana Asset Management – an arm of crypto exchange Bybit, SOF International, Digital Finance Group, and crypto exchange Bitvavo, along with three individual creditors Amelia Alvarez, Richard Weston, and Teddy Andre Amadeo Goriss.

The group was appointed by William Harrington, a representative for the United States Trustee – an executive branch agency within the Justice Department responsible for monitoring bankruptcy cases. The formation of a creditor’s committee is an important step in bankruptcy proceedings.

Related: Genesis Capital’s fall might transform crypto lending — not bury it

With over $290 million exposure, Bitvavo sits among the biggest creditors, alongside claims of Mirana with $150 million and $37 million from Digital Finance Group.

Genesis Global Holdco and its lending business subsidiaries, Genesis Global Capital and Genesis Asia Pacific — collectively known as Genesis Capital, filed for bankruptcy on Jan. 19, citing liabilities up to $10 billion.

The companies sought relief under Chapter 11 two months after disclosing liquidity issues due to the collapse of crypto exchange FTX. Withdrawals have been suspended from Genesis Global Capital’s platform since Nov. 16.

On Jan. 24, a group of creditors filed a securities class action (SCA) lawsuit against Genesis parent-company Digital Currency Group (DCG), and its founder and CEO Barry Silbert, alleging violations of the federal securities laws.

The lawsuit claims that Genesis committed securities fraud through a scheme to defraud potential and existing digital asset lenders by making false and misleading statements. In the plaintiffs’ view, Genesis intentionally misrepresented its financial condition, in violation of the United States Securities Exchange Act section 10(b).