Investments

Metaverse promises: Future of Web3 or just a market gimmick?

The hype around metaverse has taken a hit after recent turmoil in crypto markets, but industry leaders and stakeholders still see it as the future of Web3.

The Metaverse as a concept is an attempt to fuse physical reality, augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) into one seamless and immersive experience.

The term “metaverse” was first used in Neil Stephenson’s 1982 cyberpunk novel Snow Crash. Stephenson’s metaverse was a virtual place where characters could go to escape a dreary totalitarian reality. Some of the key attributes of the Metaverse include:

Even before the Metaverse became a phenomenon amid the nonfungible token (NFT) craze and crypto market boom, the concept was already in focus with the likes of Facebook, now Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Samsung and several other leading companies investing heavily in AR technology since the early 2010s.

In 2014, Meta acquired Oculus VR in a $2 billion deal with of focus on developing augmented and virtual reality-based games. In the same year, Sony and Samsung announced they were creating their own VR headsets, and Google released Google Glass AR glasses.

In 2020, Apple introduced. Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) to iPhones and iPods, which offered better depth scanning for photos and introduced AR features. The technology is also paving the way for mixed-reality headsets in the future. In 2021, Facebook rebranded itself to Meta to shift from purely social media to leading the metaverse race.

With a downturn in crypto markets, both NFTs and the Metaverse saw a rapid decline in interest and capital flow. Google trend data suggests metaverse was piquing interest until January 2022. However, as the bear market progressed, wiping out nearly 70% of the market valuation, interest in the Metaverse and NFTs have taken a dip.

Google Trends data on search term “Metaverse“ since Aug. 9, 2021

There has been a drastic change in the approach from brands that, at the start of the year, were all about the Metaverse and NFTs. Recently, Tinder, the popular dating app, has cut down its metaverse plans in the wake of disappointing Q2 earnings. 

Recent: Ethereum advances with standards for smart contract security audits

Efforts at creating a futuristic AR-based virtual world are presently at a very nascent stage, and some experts believe that current technological barriers both at the hardware and software levels are partially to blame. Lili Zhao, director of ecosystem growth at Neo Blockchain, told Cointelegraph:

“The Metaverse is still in its infancy, so existing projects are industry pioneers which mean trials and errors before it reaches product maturity. Currently, neither the hardware nor the software infrastructure is adequate to unleash the full potential of Metaverse. This is an area of technological innovation with fundamental growth opportunities for years to come, regardless of the market condition which is more driven by cycles and sentiment.”

Sandra Helou, the head of metaverse and NFT at Zilliqa, said that people view the Metaverse as a new concept. However, she believes the Metaverse is just an enhanced iteration of the internet and the more we embrace it as a new form of engagement, the less threatening it will seem. She told Cointelegraph:

“The keyboard never replaced the pen and the pen never replaced the pencil. Web3 shouldn’t be viewed as a replacement for Web2 but rather as an enhancer focusing on greater engagement and connectivity. The future of the Metaverse should look at combining elements of the physical and digital worlds through seamless integration and interactivity accessible for all regardless of industry.”

The critique of the Metaverse

The Metaverse as a concept has divided the world into two halves, where on one side, the likes of Meta, Microsoft, Sony and Samsung are all-in on the technology, calling it the future of the internet, while on the other hand, the likes of Elon Musk and Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin believe the present forms of the Metaverse are nothing more than corporate fantasy.

Buterin recently said that existing attempts by corporations to create a metaverse are not “going anywhere,” stating that Meta will “misfire.” Buterin’s comments came in the wake of Meta’s $2 billion quarterly loss on its metaverse division.

Marius Ciubotariu, the co-founder of decentralized finance stablecoin issuer Hubble Protocol, told Cointelegraph that the involvement of companies such as Meta has given a bad outlook to the industry in recent times, stating, “Companies like Meta are betting on the Metaverse big time. Unfortunately, this has led to many having negative or conflicting ideas about what the Metaverse is.”

“Meta, like some of its competitors that have publicly embraced the Metaverse, are selling it as nothing more than an extension of social media data mining, where individuals have no control over their personal information and data. These centralized metaverses contradict principles of decentralization such as immutability, censorship resistance and permissionless access.”

He added that the Metaverse has a bright future, but established projects like The Sandbox and Decentraland will likely take the bulk of the market share, and smaller, underfunded projects may not be able to deliver on their enormous promise due to lack of resources, time, experience, funding and the difficulty of development. He went on to predict that “similar to the 2017 initial coin offering phase, most of these projects will either not see the light of day or fail to attain the necessary user base to maintain a healthy funding margin.”

Other critics believe that centralized metaverses such as those proposed by Meta and Microsoft may affect the decentralized ownership of goods and services within those ecosystems.

Ben Advia, founder and CEO of crypto-collectible and metaverse platform Dissrup, explained the current skepticism around metaverses and how it could potentially change. He told Cointelegraph that even though there have been many attempts to exploit the enthusiasm surrounding Web3 and the Metaverse for corporate and personal gain, it would be cynical to dismiss the efforts being made by many to build something genuinely revolutionary:

“It is important to remember that the Metaverse in its ‘true’ form was never going to arrive perfectly polished and flawlessly executed, just as it took time for us to harvest the potential of the internet. The Metaverse takes time to develop into the idealized web-centric utopia that we have all been discussing and envisioning over the past couple of years.” 

“Until such a time, the concept will continue to be subject to criticism and skepticism, forever associated with the laughable graphics and clunky interfaces of proto-metaverse spaces, while we continue to overlook how it might change the way we function and exist in this emerging hybrid digital/physical space,” he added. 

Kirk Allen, CEO of metaverse aggregator Kaloscope, told Cointelegraph that the hype around the market and involvement of corporate giants such as Meta and Microsoft have hampered the vision around the concept. He explained:

“There is a ‘hype’ within multiple sectors, excited and deeming that the next big thing for Web3 is the Metaverse. Without fully understanding what ‘metaverse’ means, most people are just following suit as Facebook re-branded into Meta. Among skeptics, the term ‘metaverse’ sounds too optimistic, and is commonly questioned for lacking in definition. Having said that, the metaverse is not a badly executed idea or a dream. In fact, if you want to think of it this way, it is in the cocoon stage, and soon will emerge in many more ways to the general public in business and communities.”

Looking beyond the hype

The growing interest of tech giants in the Metaverse has raised concerns about centralization and monopoly, but it is important to note that their billions worth of investment caused a ripple effect for the industry. Their involvement attracts more attention to the sector along with more investment and more tools will reach the market. Such development tools will save entrepreneurs the time needed to create new technologies and will allow them to focus on their innovations. 

While interest in the Metaverse has cooled, it has not disappeared entirely, especially in the United Arab Emirates. Crown Prince Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum on July 20, announced that Dubai will be hosting a global event to bring metaverse experts together in September 2023. The country is planning to ramp up its efforts and create 40,000 new jobs around the Metaverse, showing that some governments are beginning to understand how valuable this sector can become.

Metaverse developers like Decentraland and The Sandbox have come together with several Web3 projects to launch the Open Metaverse Alliance, which focuses on building more transparent, inclusive, decentralized and democratized metaverses. Sean Kelly, founder of Chibi Dinos NFT collection, told Cointelegraph:

“There has been no clear-cut winner on which company will have the biggest metaverse yet, but there is no doubt virtual experiences will be a part of our future and the Metaverse will play a massive role in our children’s future.”

As the Metaverse brings the online and offline worlds closer together, it offers new opportunities for businesses to scale and individuals to connect. For example, engaging with a virtual 3D avatar customer service agent rather than a corporate employee in a chat window may build a more immersive and memorable customer experience. 

Recent: Web3 games incorporate features to drive female participation

For an avid video gamer, a metaverse may be the utopia they are hoping for, as they get to conveniently switch between online gaming and virtual socializing. With digital identities, there is also potential for people to explore alternate characters for themselves.

Sports leagues could integrate VR/metaverse capabilities to increase viewership as well as an NFT component to reward viewers. Shopping malls and stores have already created virtual stores in which one can shop at home and virtually try on wearables.

The future of the Metaverse will depend on stakeholders and how they build the future of Web3. The current form may look underpromising due to a lack of technological innovations, but industry leaders are sure that the Metaverse concept will take center stage in the next iteration of the internet.

Summer doldrums? Crypto volumes are down 55%, according to CoinShares

Bitcoin investment products, which include ETFs, ETPs and Grayscale’s GBTC, saw a third consecutive week of outflows.

Crypto investment products registered minor weekly outflows last week as volumes plunged to their second-lowest levels of the year, signaling weak demand among institutional investors during the tail end of summer.

Outflows from digital asset investment products totaled $8.7 million in the week ending Sunday, CoinShares reported Monday. Bitcoin (BTC) investment products saw a third consecutive week of outflows totaling $15.3 million. Funds with direct exposure to Solana (SOL) also registered minor outflows totaling $1.4 million.

Meanwhile, Ether (ETH) and multi-asset investment products registered small weekly inflows of $2.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively.

Overall, crypto investment products registered $1 billion in weekly volumes, which is 55% below the yearly average.

CoinShares said most of the negative sentiment had been centered around Bitcoin, which tumbled last week after facing a stern rejection at $25,000. Bitcoin currently sits around $21,200, which is below its realized price, or the average price at which BTC’s circulating supply was last purchased.

Related: Over 200K BTC now stored in Bitcoin ETFs and other institutional products

Crypto’s strong correlation with traditional equities leaves the asset class exposed to further volatility ahead of the Federal Reserve’s annual Jackson Hole Summit in Wyoming later this week. While options traders see little cause for concern, Fed Chair Jerome Powell could reinforce the central bank’s policy expectations for the fall when he delivers his Jackson Hole address on Friday.

Large institutions offloaded $5.5 billion worth of BTC between May and July, mostly as a result of forced selling, according to Arcane Research. Institutional investors appear to be hanging out on the sidelines due to crypto market volatility, a rocky macro backdrop and uncertainty on the regulatory front.

MMORPG went into ‘hiatus’ after crypto investors bailed, denies it misused funds

Phat Loop Studios, the company behind the “Pokemon-like” game Untamed Isles has blamed the crypto market crash as a reason its investors bailed.

Phat Loop Studios, the company under fire last week for abandoning its Kickstarter and crypto-funded MMORPG game Untamed Isles, is now denying accusations that they lost their backers’ funds investing in crypto.

The company came under fire last week after announcing a “hiatus” of their Pokemon-like open-world video game, with some of the community accusing the developers of spending game development funds to bet on the crypto markets.

In a statement on Wednesday, the developers behind the project, which raised over $525,000 United States dollars, or $841,000 New Zealand dollars, on Kickstarter, insisted that all funds raised “were spent by the studio developing the game.”

The company stated that the reason for the hiatus is due to “the company exhausting its available funds” after “several investors” pulled out recently “due to concerns about both the economic market along with the crypto market.”

According to the initial announcement about the hiatus, the project had been gearing toward an October release. owever, Grant stated that the development of the project had been put on pause as the company was unable to “financially keep up with the demands.”

Grant stated that the main reason for this was due to the “economic landscape” changing for cryptocurrency, making it hard to continue pursuing the project that employed “more than 70 staff” to work “relentlessly for more than two years” to build the project.

“The crypto market crash meant that investors that were lined up earlier this year pulled out” who was necessary to “make it through to our runway to launch,” said Grant. 

The game was initially designed to launch with nonfungible token (NFT) implementation, but the plans for this were later dropped outside of an optional external marketplace.

This angered many who questioned the legitimacy of using the crypto market crashing as an excuse for the project failing if it was based on “game first, crypto second.” 

It is unclear how much the project actually planned to integrate cryptocurrency into the project at all, however, Grant stated that “until the crypto situation is resolved — and we’re confident it will be at some stage ” then we have to hibernate development on this project.”


CME Group plans to launch options on ETH futures prior to the Merge

The group reported it had observed an increase in trading volume and open interest for ETH futures and micro-sized ETH futures options, possibly in anticipation of the Merge.

Major derivatives marketplace Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group intends to launch options trading for its Ether (ETH) futures products.

In a Thursday announcement, the CME Group said that subject to regulatory review, it plans to launch options contracts for its Ether futures, sized at 50 ETH per contract. The futures options, expected to start trading on Sept. 12, will follow the firm launching micro-sized Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether options in March 2022, BTC options trading products in January 2020, and a BTC futures contract in December 2017.

CME Group’s global head of equity and FX products Tim McCourt cited the Ethereum blockchain’s upcoming transition to proof-of-stake — also known as the Merge — in announcing the ETH futures product. McCourt said the group had observed an increase in trading volume and open interest for ETH futures and micro-sized ETH futures options, possibly in anticipation of the Merge.

“We have […] seen heightened activity in our September and December Micro Ether options, which could also suggest that participants are hedging risk around the proposed date of the merge,” said McCourt in a statement shared with Cointelegraph. “Seventy-eight percent of Micro Ether options open interest is in the September and December contracts.”

The CME Group reported a 7% increase in the average daily trading volume of ETH futures from June to July and a 41% increase in the same volume of contracts of micro ETH futures. Trading activity for ETH and investment vehicles linked to the cryptocurrency could see significant volume in advance of the Merge, which core developers expect to happen on Sept. 15.

Related: CME Group plans to launch euro-denominated Bitcoin and Ether futures

According to data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro, the price of ETH is $1,863 at the time of publication, having risen 2% in the last 24 hours. The token hit an all-time high price of roughly $4,800 in November 2021.

Study: Insider trading occurs in 10% to 25% of cryptocurrency listings

The study found abnormal levels of return in a sample of tokens just before their listing announcement on Coinbase.

According to a recent study conducted by the University of Technology Sydney, researchers estimated that insider trading occurs in 10% to 25% of cryptocurrency listings.

In deriving the conclusion, researchers first sampled 146 token listing announcements on cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase between September 25, 2018, and May 1, 2022. Afterward, researchers examined the price movements of the sampled tokens in the time interval of 300 hours before Coinbase listing announcements up until 100 hours after the announcement, on various exchanges.

The hypothesis was that if insider trading was involved, tokens that were also available to trade on decentralized exchanges, or DEXs, before the listing would see abnormal returns compared to those not listed on DEXs. Researchers claim that statistically significant levels of abnormal returns, 10% to 25% of the tokens studied, were observed and that the price patterns on DEXs immediately before the Coinbase listings were similar to “run-ups” witnessed in known cases of stock insider trading.

Additionally, a small subset of wallet addresses on the aforementioned DEXs was suspected of strong accumulation and then quick disposition of tokens after the Coinbase listing went live. The study, still in the draft status, has not been peer-reviewed.

The scopes of studies are normally limited by their ability to prove causation on top of correlation, or that the abnormal returns in the study can be definitely attributed to traders with non-public information accumulating ahead of time.  Coincidently, around the same time the paper was submitted, the U.S. Department of Justice charged a former Coinbase executive with insider trading. The exec has since pled not guilty. 

Google invested a whopping $1.5B into blockchain companies since September

Other notable corporate investors include BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, Samsung and Goldman Sachs, according to a report from Blockdata.

Google parent company Alphabet poured the most amount of capital into the blockchain industry compared to any other public company, investing $1.5 billion between Sep. 2021 and Jun. 2022, a new report shows. 

In an updated blog published by Blockdata on Wednesday, Alphabet (Google) was revealed as the investor with the deepest pockets compared to the top 40 public corporations investing in blockchain and crypto companies during the period.

The company invested $1.5 billion into the space, concentrating on four blockchain companies including digital asset custody platform Fireblocks, Web3 gaming company Dapper Labs, Bitcoin infrastructure tool Voltage and venture capital company Digital Currency Group.

This is in stark contrast to last year when Google diversified its much smaller $601.4 million funding effort across 17 blockchain-based companies, which again included Dapper Labs, along with Alchemy, Blockchain.com, Celo, Helium and Ripple.

Google’s increased investment into the blockchain industry is consistent with the other top 40 publicly traded companies, with $6 billion in total being invested during this time, compared to $1.9 billion between Jan. 2021 to Sep. 2021 and $506 million in all of 2020.

Source: Blockdata

The other big corporate investors include asset management company BlackRock, which invested $1.17 billion, investment banking corporation Morgan Stanley, investing $1.11 billion, and electronics company Samsung, with investments totaling $979.2 million.

Like Google, Morgan Stanley and BlackRock adopted a more concentrated approach investing in only two to three companies during the period. However, Samsung was by far the most active investor having invested in 13 different companies.

The data also found that companies offering some form of nonfungible token (NFT) solutions have been the most popular investment:

“Many of these belong to industries such as gaming, arts & entertainment, and distributed ledger technology (DLT).”

The remaining investments have been split between companies that provide Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS), infrastructure, smart contract platforms, scaling solutions and digital asset custody platforms.

Related: Beyond the hype: NFTs can lead the way in transforming business experiences

The data also found that banks have started to increase their exposure to crypto and blockchain companies, driven by an increase in client demand for crypto services. Among the banks finding themselves on the top list of crypto investors are United Overseas Bank, Commonwealth Bank of Australia and BNY Mellon.

Crypto needs ‘enabling environment,’ Philippines central bank says

The Philippine central bank sees crypto’s potential for improving domestic and cross-border payments, but the authority is still negative about crypto as a legal tender.

Amid the rising cryptocurrency adoption in the Philippines, the country’s central bank is seeking measures to better protect investors through elevating local crypto awareness.

The Philippine central bank, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), wants to promote crypto education as the authority sees a lot of benefits associated with crypto and blockchain, a BSP representative said in an interview with Cointelegraph.

“The BSP’s focus is on virtual assets’ capacity to improve the delivery of financial services, particularly payments and remittances services, as it has potential to provide faster and economical transfer of funds, both for domestic and international setting,” the BSP stated.

According to the BSP, crypto adoption in the Philippines has increased over the past few years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, Bitcoin (BTC) trading volumes in the Philippines were hitting new highs on some peer-to-peer crypto exchanges in July 2021.

“During the pandemic, we have seen the willingness of consumers to explore the virtual realm, particularly online platforms that promise to offer income-generating opportunities or play-to-earn applications,” the BSP spokesperson said.

In response to the growing adoption, the Philippine central bank does not plan to adopt any significant limits on crypto investments or trading at this point. Instead, the BSP is looking to implement a regulatory approach aimed at providing an “enabling environment” through “risk-based and proportionate regulations,” the central bank’s representative said, adding:

“The BSP will continue to enhance and expand our financial consumer awareness campaigns specifically designed to educate relevant stakeholders on virtual assets, both as to advantages and the risks involved.”

Despite targeting an “enabling environment” for crypto, the BSP holds a highly negative stance on using crypto as a payment method. “Virtual assets, particularly cryptocurrencies, whose values are derived based on the agreement of the community of users, are not intrinsically designed to serve as legal tender,” the bank noted.

According to the BSP, cryptocurrencies cannot serve as a means of payment due to risks like high volatility and a high potential for unlawful use or theft due to increased anonymity and “weak cyber and digital identity security protocols.” Among other risks, the bank mentioned crypto transaction irreversibility, which means that no central authority would ever be able to cancel a Bitcoin transaction or restore such funds.

The BSP also pointed out that the regulator considers cryptocurrencies virtual assets rather than a currency. “Since the price of most virtual assets is driven by speculation, virtual assets expose users to price volatility and risk of losses,” the BSP noted. To address this, the central bank issued guidelines for virtual asset service providers as part of Circular No. 1108 in January 2021.

Related: The Philippines halts virtual asset provider license applications

The BSP still sees great opportunities in utilizing blockchain technology to enhance the security and efficiency of financial services in the Philippines. The central bank is currently exploring the issuance of a central bank digital currency (CBDC).

The BSP is planning to undertake Project CBDCPh, a pilot project that will enable inter-institutional fund transfers utilizing a wholesale CBDC platform. According to the bank, a retail CBDC is not highly relevant for the country in the near term.

Kevin O’Leary says sacrificing Tornado Cash worth it for institutional adoption

Mr. Wonderful thinks that crypto needs more regulation and less “crypto cowboys” like Tornado Cash creator Alexey Pertsev, who he suggested was a necessary sacrifice to create stability for institutional inflows.

Clamping down on crypto applications that “mess with the primal forces of regulation” is necessary, says Shark Tank host and millionaire venture capitalist Kevin O’Leary, who argued that Tornado Cash and similar services are preventing real institutional capital from coming into the space.

In a discussion on Crypto Banter on Saturday, O’Leary, also known as Mr. Wonderful, suggested that applications like Ethereum-based crypto mixer Tornado Cash are a part of a “crypto cowboy” culture that shouldn’t have a place in the industry.

Instead, O’Leary is of the view that crypto needs a “rules-based environment” in order to attract real institutional capital into the digital-asset industry, and much of that regulation needs to stamp out protocols like Tornado Cash, which enables users to conduct anonymous transactions and therefore potentially engage in criminal activity.

In the discussion, O’Leary didn’t back down on his opinion regarding the arrest of the Tornado Cash creator Alexey Pertsev, stating:

“At the end of the day, it’s okay to arrest that guy. Why? He’s messing with the primal forces of regulation […] If we have to sacrifice him, that’s okay, because we want to have some stability in that institutional capital.”

The venture capitalist said that while institutional interest in the digital-assets sector continues to increase, “they’re not going to touch it while crypto cowboys are riding the fence.” O’Leary emphasized that “until we get rid of this crap,” there will be no “stability in […] institutional capital,” but he believes that the industry is slowly but surely weeding out the “cowboys:”

“I think we’re getting to that stage now. Maybe we’re in the third or fourth inning towards that, but I’m tired of this crypto cowboy crap. I want to get involved in a regulated place where we can bring billions of dollars to work. I don’t need to be a crypto cowboy, and I don’t want to be one because I work in the regulated world.”

But, O’Leary’s opinion flies in the face of the sentiment of many in the space. The United States government’s sanctioning of the Ethereum-based privacy tool last week enraged many influential crypto figures who defended the need for basic privacy rights on decentralized networks.

Gnosis co-founder Stefan George was one of those who defended Tornado Cash, stating that the protocol brings “much-needed privacy” to Ethereum and that writing open-source software should be recognized as “an expression of free speech.”

Chainlink Lead Developer Advocate Patrick Collins also said that the decision to remove Tornado Cash’s GitHub account is “much worse than sanctioning a website,” as code is speech and, by doing so, the U.S. Treasury is violating the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Ethereum educator Anthony Sassano shared in a Tweet to his 218,000 followers that he was temporarily banned from decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol Aave after his address was blacklisted for recieving 0.1 Ether (ETH) from an anonymous person via Tornado Cash. Sassano went on to note that the “main conclusion I have come to from recent events is that Ethereum is more of a concern to governments/nation states than Bitcoin.”

Related: Tornado Cash co-founder reports being kicked off GitHub as industry reacts to sanctions

Last week, Dutch financial crime authority the Fiscal Information and Investigation Service (FIOD), arrested a 29-year-old Tornado Cash developer who was suspected to be involved in money laundering via the protocol.

According to a Dutch regulatory body, over $7 billion have flowed through Tornado Cash’s smart contracts since its inception in 2019. The sanctions from the U.S. Treasury came after more claims that the protocol had increasingly been used for money laundering activities.

Wealth managers and VCs are helping drive institutional crypto adoption — Wave Financial execs

“Things are much more encouraging, even though this is clearly a time of pain,” said Wave Financial’s head of business development Mike Jones.

Two executives at Wave Financial, an asset management firm providing bespoke strategies to high-net-worth individuals and entities, have reported seeing increased institutional demand for crypto products amid the bear market.

Speaking to Cointelegraph at the Blockchain Futurist Conference in Toronto on Wednesday, Wave Financial’s head of business development Mike Jones said institutional investment in crypto could be driven by the high end of wealth management firms, including Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs, looking for ways to allow their clients to get exposure to the space. Jones cited the example of BlackRock partnering with Coinbase on Aug. 4, a move that will give users of the asset manager’s institutional investment management platform Aladdin access to crypto trading, custody, prime brokerage and reporting capabilities.

In addition to wealth managers, the Wave exec said venture capital may see “a lot of growth” in part due to demand for innovative investment vehicles. Wave Financial’s investment and venture principal Gerard Berile added that VCs giving clients exposure to crypto without going through centralized exchanges and still dealing in large-scale volume has been a “net positive for the industry as a whole.”

“On the venture side of the house, the bear market has been somewhat of a positive thing,” said Berile. “Over the past year, year and a half, we’ve seen valuations of a lot of different companies get incredibly high — a bit frothy, you could say. In the past six months or so, we’ve seen valuations on companies come down to a bit more realistic valuations, and it’s become a great time to begin allocating capital.”

Blockchain Futurist Conference in Toronto, Canada

“What’s encouraging from a market perspective in general is that you think about the last cycle — a few years ago, a lot of the chatter that was surrounding the ecosystem then was: ‘Is this the end of crypto? Is crypto dead?’” said Jones. “From an institutional adoption standpoint and an institutional demand standpoint, the question now seems to be much more surrounding ‘Is this the right time to get in?’”

He added:

“Things are much more encouraging, even though this is clearly a time of pain. That comes with opportunity as well, particularly for people that are building in the space.”

Related: Bitcoin institutional buying ‘could be big narrative again’ as 30K BTC leaves Coinbase

Data from the blockchain seem to support some of Berile’s and Jones’ claims. Crypto intelligence firm IntoTheBlock reported in March that the number of large transactions on the Cardano blockchain increased more than 50-fold in 2020, suggesting “increasing institutional demand.” However, United States regulators have not approved certain crypto investment vehicles like an exchange-traded fund with direct exposure to Bitcoin (BTC) — many have said such a listing could attract new investors to the market.

Selling Bitcoin doesn’t mean you’re not bullish: Cypherpunk CEO

Cypherpunk is one of the first public firms in the world to ever invest in Bitcoin and it opted to sell 100% of its crypto by June 2022.

Despite a massive wave of liquidations on the cryptocurrency market, some companies that sold their crypto over the past few months are not bearish on Bitcoin (BTC) at all.

Canada-based investment firm Cypherpunk Holdings was one of the companies that opted to sell crypto amid the crypto winter of 2022, liquidating 100% of its Bitcoin and Ether (ETH) by June. One of the first public companies in the world to ever invest in Bitcoin, Cypherpunk said at the time that it maintained its long-term “bullish outlook on crypto” despite selling all its digital coins.

One may find Cypherpunk’s crypto liquidation somewhat odd as the company’s stock is publicly trading under the ticker symbol HODL on the Canadian Securities Exchange. The acronym is widely used in the crypto community to refer to “Hold On for Dear Life,” or the bullish strategy of holding onto Bitcoin no matter what the market circumstances are.

According to Cypherpunk CEO Jeffrey Gao, crypto investors can still remain bullish despite cashing out their crypto from time to time.

“We’re in this business because we are net bullish on crypto over the long term,” Gao said in an interview with Cointelegraph. Cypherpunk can go back into Bitcoin or into “any crypto or any basket of crypto” tomorrow if they want, and those are ​​”certainly opportunities” that the firm is actively pursuing, the CEO noted.

Gao said that the industry has seen forced liquidations as even “supposedly the most sophisticated” institutions like Voyager, Three Arrows Capital and Celsius got involved in operations that were “completely devoid of risk management.” According to the CEO, the absence or near absence of risk management is what really separates the crypto industry from something that is more mature. Gao added:

“Going forward, that mentality towards risk management while still being bullish over the long term is very important. […] You can be bullish on crypto, but you can still sell out of the market.”

According to Gao, Cypherpunk started the liquidation process in early May, right before the Terra (LUNA) — now renamed Terra Classic (LUNC) — network collapse, with the algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD (formerly UST) losing its U.S. dollar peg on May 10. “By the time that it happened, we probably offloaded about 30% or 40% of the risk,” Gao said, adding that Cypherpunk then sold another portion when BTC briefly traded above $30,000 in late May. “The final one-third we probably got rid of was sometime in June,” Gao noted.

Related: Elon Musk: US ’past peak inflation’ after Tesla sells 90% of Bitcoin

“We basically made no progress, but we also avoided much of the capital destruction,” Gao said. He went on to say that he is very optimistic about altcoins like Ether and Solana (SOL), despite some issues with the Solana ecosystem issues in early August.

“Over the longer term, at least at this point in time, I would be more bullish on Bitcoin conservatively than those other tokens. But over the next two or three months, I’m probably more partial towards Ethereum and Solana,” the CEO noted.