exchanges

Peer-to-peer crypto exchanges struggle to navigate shifting legal landscape

Two major P2P platforms announced their closure in the first quarter of 2023. Many blame it on growing regulatory scrutiny, but experts call for better alternatives.

A peer-to-peer (P2P) cryptocurrency exchange is an online marketplace that connects buyers and sellers of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC). The platform enables them to conduct direct business with one another without the need for intermediaries. 

When purchasing cryptocurrency on a P2P exchange, a buyer transfers the agreed-upon amount from their account to the seller. The payment is not made between a consumer and a money services company but between two distinct customers.

P2P exchanges were once the lifeline of the crypto ecosystem, owing to the ease of exchange and privacy features that these platforms offered. However, in 2023, some of these key features have driven them to fall under increased scrutiny from regulators.

On Feb. 9, 2023, Finland-based P2P exchange platform LocalBitcoins announced it was closing after 10 years in service. The platform cited tough market conditions owing to the ongoing crypto winter, along with increasing regulatory pressure and declining market share.

The abrupt closure of one of the oldest P2P Bitcoin trading platforms came within weeks of the United States Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) naming the platform as one of the largest Bitcoin counterparties to the Russian-affiliated exchange Bitzlato.

Bitzlato was the target of a significant enforcement action by U.S. officials who accused the platform of violating of Anti-Money Laundering rules and aiding in the evasion of Russian sanctions.

Another prominent P2P Bitcoin exchange platform Paxful, founded in 2015, suspended operations on April 4. The platform cited the ongoing regulatory environment and staff departures as the reason behind its closure. In a Twitter space, CEO Ray Youssef dwelled more on their decision and said even though American regulators have done a lot of catching up in the past five years, they “still don’t get it. They grow more suspicious every day.”

The ongoing court battle between Artur Schaback and Youssef over the control of the firm was also seen as a prominent reason behind its downfall. According to court filings, the two co-founders are currently at loggerheads over who will manage the business and have made a number of charges against one another. The accusations include, among other things, the theft of corporate finances, money laundering and circumvention of U.S. sanctions on Russia.

In an interview with Cointelegraph, both Schaback and Youssef continued their blame game and pointed fingers at the other person. Youssef claimed his co-founder’s legal tactics “bordered on terrorism” and cost Paxful many employees and directors. On the other hand, Schaback said Youssef took unilateral action to shut down Paxful on April 4, and he had no say in the day-to-day operations of the company for almost 18 months.

Recent: Crypto in Europe: Economist breaks down MiCA and future of stablecoins

Richard Mico, chief legal officer of global on- and off-ramp crypto platform Banxa, told Cointelegraph that the breakdown of relationships between the co-founders resulting in litigation could be one of many reasons behind the downfall of Paxful. He added that the ever-evolving regulatory scrutiny in the U.S. had made it difficult for the decentralized crypto platforms and P2P exchanges to thrive:

“Paxful has faced regulatory scrutiny in the past over claims of money laundering and fraud on its platform. In May of 2021, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) ordered Paxful to bolster its KYC/AML processes. It is very possible that Paxful is fearful of future ongoing investigations and remediations,” Micro told Cointelegraph.

He said that, aside from concerns over shifting regulatory requirements, market conditions are driving significant consolidation in space. However, he is hopeful that “more transparent regulation in the U.S. will enable both P2P and other exchanges to flourish in a manner that strikes the appropriate balance between consumer protection and innovation.”

P2P shutdowns impact emerging economies the most

P2P platforms have been instrumental in flourishing crypto adoption especially in developing nations and offering banking services to the unbanked. Paxful was a pioneer of crypto adoption in Nigeria, and its shutdown hit many users in the country hard.

Freelancers often used the platform to convert their wages to and from Bitcoin and make payments to each other, while traders made use of its escrow service to conduct business. As such, the closure has left many of these users in Nigeria wondering about the future of the domestic crypto marketplace.

The Indian government imposed a banking ban on crypto exchanges in 2019 cutting all banking facilities to such exchanges. However, WazirX, one of the early crypto exchanges in India, introduced its P2P platform to ensure people were still able to trade their assets. Indian crypto traders turned to P2P platforms again in 2021 after the government imposed a hefty 30% tax on crypto transactions.

Former WazirX CEO Nischal Shetty seemed more optimistic about the future of P2P platforms, particularly in the developing world. He told Cointelegraph that P2P platforms with proper Know Your Customer protocols “help onboard users, especially in developing countries without banking access, and will continue to exist.”

Nick Saponaro, CEO of decentralized payment platform provider Divi Labs, told Cointelegraph that the closures will be painful for unbanked and underbanked traders, hindering their ability to transact locally and globally.

“Countries like Malawi, where citizens are well-capitalized but have restrictive banking practices that only allow customers to withdraw a few USD daily — P2P exchanges are necessary for those individuals to interact with the global financial infrastructure,” he explained.

Ben Jorgensen, co-founder and CEO of Web3 interoperability platform Constellation Network, told Cointelegraph that the closure of P2P platforms is, unfortunately, a massive blow to developing nations, but most likely, these developing nations will see more and more native P2P exchanges crop up.

The rise of better alternatives to P2P

The declining popularity of P2P platforms and the recent closure of some of the oldest P2P platforms are also attributed to the new availability of better alternatives, as there are now more practical on-ramps that enable users to buy cryptocurrency using their bank accounts and credit cards.

The costs of doing business are also important. For example, exchanges like Coinbase spend millions of dollars just to comply with local regulations. The unbanked communities throughout the world stand to gain the most from P2P exchanges, but given the growing regulatory compliance requirements, it is unlikely that they will produce the volumes required to support them on a large scale.

Saponaro told Cointelegraph that the only way new and existing P2P exchanges will survive is as ancillary services offered by licensed operators:

“For example, Binance has a P2P platform; however, the business model is not profitable enough to be the sole revenue stream in a fully regulated environment.”

Marc Taverner, a founding member of Swiss-regulated crypto and fiat on-ramp platform Xerof, told Cointelegraph that users often switch from P2P platforms to other trusted solutions because they need to minimize counterparty risk. Users are naturally migrating to providers that can address these risks:

“We are seeing increasing demand for trusted, transparent and compliant solutions, and it will be operators with licenses from established and respected jurisdictions who will onboard most of these users. P2P markets will still exist. The long-term question just remains how they will cope with heightened regulatory requirements,” he said.

Recent: Why join a blockchain gaming guild? Fun, profit and create better games

Jorgensen said that P2P platforms will continue to evolve just like decentralized exchanges and explained, “Although DEXs [decentralized exchanges] are technically peer-to-peer exchanges, they are catered more to a trustless state with much better fees. In terms of regulation now and in the foreseeable future, cash-to-crypto and crypto-to-cash will likely end up where most if not all regulation will be enacted. Think about it. It makes sense that when entering and exiting crypto, like when you are entering and exiting stocks in trade, these cash-in and cash-out points are documented […] Ultimately governments want to tax these transactions, and this approach is the least complicated way to do so.”

The shutdown of major P2P platforms in 2023 has become a sign of evolving regulations, especially in the United States. However, experts believe that P2P platforms will still play a key role in developing nations, and these nations will move toward launching their native platforms to overcome the closure of popular global platforms.

US share of global crypto developers fell 26% in 5 years — a16z

In 2018, nearly 40% of all crypto developers were based in the United States, whereas in 2022, this figure had fallen to less than 30%.

The share of global crypto developers based in the United States declined by 26% from 2018 to 2022, according to a report from venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, also known as a16z. The report, titled “State of Crypto 2023,” cited data from Electric Capital and SimilarWeb to support its findings.

A summary of the report’s findings stated that “Between 2018 and 2022, the proportion of crypto developers based in the U.S. vs. the rest of the world fell 26%.”

Backing up this finding is a graph in the report showing U.S. share of global crypto developers was nearly 40% in 2018, but went below 30% in 2022, a percentage decline of more than one quarter.

In its summary, a16z cited lack of regulatory clarity as a possible reason for the decline, stating, “There has been much debate, but little regulatory clarity, which has hindered web3’s growth. As a result, America’s edge may be slipping.”

However, the venture capital firm expressed hope that the U.S. may regain some of its lost ground. Multiple bills tabled in Congress have sought to provide regulatory clarity for crypto assets, including the Responsible Financial Innovation Act, the Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act, and the Digital Commodity Exchange Act, the report said.

In addition, a16z cited several impactful crypto cases that may soon be decided as reasons for optimism. These include the Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement action on Ripple, the Treasury Department’s Tornado Cash civil actions, and the bankruptcy proceedings of firms such as FTX, Voyager, and Celsius.

The venture firm’s sentiment about regulatory clarity echoes many in the U.S. crypto industry. In November, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong argued that the FTX collapse was partially caused by U.S. regulations driving crypto users offshore. In December, crypto lending platform Nexo announced it was leaving the U.S. because the government allegedly “refuses to provide a path forward for enabling blockchain businesses.”

Bitget launches $100M Web3 fund for crypto projects in Asia

Bitget’s new fund will receive $100 million as an initial investment to support the next generation of Web3 projects.

Crypto derivatives exchange Bitget launched a new fund focused on supporting the next generation of Web3 projects. According to a statement seen by Cointelegraph, $100 million will be invested in the fund as an initial investment. 

Bitget says it will target funding Web3-friendly venture firms and projects worldwide. It will focus on Asian projects from experienced teams with clear roadmaps that are working on real-world problems.

“We can see that Web3 space is evolving rapidly and many projects deserve the support to further advance such development and make Web3 a truly global phenomenon, as Web2 had once become. That is why the Bitget Web3 Fund will strive to seek out projects that have the most impact on this process,” said Gracy Chen, managing director of Bitget.

Related: China to upgrade national blockchain standards by 2025

According to the exchange, potential partners in the initiative include several venture capitalists such as Foresight Ventures, ABCDE Capital, SevenX Ventures and DAO Maker, as well as Dragonfly Capital — which recently announced a $10 million investment on Bitget to support its ongoing global expansion.

Bitget revealed that since launching in 2018, it has attracted over 80,000 traders and 380,000 copy traders. The exchange plans to expand spot trading, the launchpad and Bitget Earn products in 2023. Bitget recently acquired the BitKeep wallet — a Web3 access gateway with over 9.5 million users — for $30 million.

During last year’s bear market, the exchange also launched a $200 million fund to safeguard users’ assets and restore investors’ confidence. Bitget pledged to secure the fund’s value for three years. In addition, the exchange claims to have implemented strict Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) policies last year to keep bad actors out of its services. 

Magazine: Hodler’s Digest, April 2-8: BTC white paper hidden on macOS, Binance loses AUS license and DOGE news

Banking crisis could spark the first ‘extended duration Bitcoin bull market,’ says Swan Bitcoin CEO

The next BTC bull market will last longer than previous ones due to the latest banking crisis, according to Swan Bitcoin CEO Cory Klippsten.

The latest banking crisis could lead to “the first-ever extended duration bull market” for Bitcoin (BTC), according to Swan Bitcoin CEO Cory Klippsten.

In an interview with Cointelegraph, Klippsten pointed out that far more people today know about Bitcoin as a tool to opt out of the traditional financial system than during the previous banking crisis, which engulfed Cyprus in 2013. 

That means the next Bitcoin bull could potentially last for two to three years, instead of just a few months, thinks Klippsten. 

According to Klippsten, Bitcoin is not threatened by the current regulatory crackdown in the United States, which he sees as a natural backlash after last year’s FTX collapse. The Bitcoin maximalist supports the Securities and Exchange Commission’s view on altcoins — that they should be regulated as securities. “To want to have security regulation for thee, but not for me, which is what the altcoin industry wants, […] I think it is just hypocritical,” he said.

Klippsten welcomed the latest Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s lawsuit against Binance, which he sees as a net positive for Bitcoin. According to Klippsten, centralized exchanges like Binance have been slowing down the adoption of Bitcoin by promoting altcoins, which he sees as mainly “pump and dump schemes.”

“The primary marketing activity of Coinbase and of Binance is to market altcoins […] Altcoins in particular since 2017 have siphoned away demand from Bitcoin,” he said.

To learn about a Bitcoin maximalist’s view on the current banking crisis and the U.S. crackdown on crypto, check out the full interview with Klippsten on our YouTube channel, and don’t forget to subscribe!

Japan FSA flags Binance, Bybit, others for operating without registration

Japan’s FSA warns Binance, Bybit, MEXC Global and BitForex, among others, for unregistered operations as it cracks down on crypto exchanges in Japan.

In a warning letter released on Friday, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) said that a number of foreign cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, Bybit, MEXC Global and Bitget, have been conducting business in the country without proper registration, violating the nation’s fund settlement laws.

According to the warning letter, the FSA stated that the listed exchanges had breached Japan’s fund settlement regulations by conducting crypto asset exchange business without proper registration. The regulator clarified that the current list of unregistered traders may not accurately represent the current state of unregistered businesses.

The FSA’s action follows a crackdown on unregistered crypto exchanges in the East Asian nation. In 2020, the FSA introduced new regulations requiring crypto exchanges to register with the agency and obtain a license to operate in Japan.

Binance being warned by the FSA signifies the cryptocurrency industry in Japan and other nations is facing greater regulatory scrutiny. The risks associated with unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges, such as fraud, money laundering and market manipulation, are concerning regulators more and more

Although Japan is working on new regulations for the crypto and Web3 sectors, the country has not cracked down on the industry as hard as some other larger economies, such as the United States.

Related: US crackdown will push crypto ‘center of gravity’ to Hong Kong: Kaiko CEO

The crypto exchange firm, Binance and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, were recently sued by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission over regulatory violations.

The FSA also issued a formal warning letter to Binance for operating without necessary permissions back in 2021.

Cointelegraph reached out to Binance, Bybit and MEXC for comments on the warning issued by the Japanese FSA but didn’t get any response at the time of publication.

Magazine: US and China try to crush Binance, SBF’s $40M bribe claim: Asia Express

Japan FSA flags Bybit, others for operating without registration

Japan’s FSA warns Bitget, Bybit, MEXC Global and BitForex, among others, for unregistered operations as it cracks down on crypto exchanges in Japan.

In a warning letter released on Friday, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) said that a number of foreign cryptocurrency exchanges, including Bybit, MEXC Global and Bitget, have been conducting business in the country without proper registration, violating the nation’s fund settlement laws.

According to the warning letter, the FSA stated that the listed exchanges had breached Japan’s fund settlement regulations by conducting crypto asset exchange business without proper registration. The regulator clarified that the current list of unregistered traders may not accurately represent the current state of unregistered businesses.

The FSA’s action follows a crackdown on unregistered crypto exchanges in the East Asian nation. In 2020, the FSA introduced new regulations requiring crypto exchanges to register with the agency and obtain a license to operate in Japan.

Crypto exchangs being warned by the FSA signifies the cryptocurrency industry in Japan and other nations is facing greater regulatory scrutiny. The risks associated with unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges, such as fraud, money laundering and market manipulation, are concerning regulators more and more

Although Japan is working on new regulations for the crypto and Web3 sectors, the country has not cracked down on the industry as hard as some other larger economies, such as the United States.

Related: US crackdown will push crypto ‘center of gravity’ to Hong Kong: Kaiko CEO

The FSA also issued a formal warning letter to Binance for operating without necessary permissions back in 2021.

Cointelegraph reached out to Bybit and MEXC for comments on the warning issued by the Japanese FSA but didn’t get any response at the time of publication.

Magazine: US and China try to crush Binance, SBF’s $40M bribe claim: Asia Express

Mt. Gox creditor saga: What lessons has the Bitcoin community learned?

The downfall of Mt. Gox continues to highlight the importance of greater transparency and accountability within the cryptocurrency industry.

In the early days of Bitcoin, Mt. Gox was by far the most prominent Bitcoin (BTC) exchange in the world. The Tokyo-based company was responsible for more than 70% of all Bitcoin transactions in 2013. However, by early 2014, it had collapsed spectacularly, leaving investors and traders with losses amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. 

The downfall of Mt. Gox was a defining moment in the history of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general, with several regulators, market analysts and industry experts continuing to study the case to prevent such instances in the future. Moreover, the saga has continued to serve as a cautionary tale for the cryptocurrency industry, highlighting the potential risks and pitfalls associated with digital currency trading and investments.

Mt. Gox: The early years

Mt. Gox was launched in 2010 by Jed McCaleb, a programmer and entrepreneur who had previously founded the file-sharing network eDonkey2000. At the time, Bitcoin was still a niche technology that was largely unknown outside of a small group of enthusiasts and developers. Mt. Gox was one of the first exchanges that allowed users to buy and sell Bitcoin for fiat assets, thereby quickly amassing a high degree of popularity among early adopters and traders.

Recent: 4 out of 10 NFT sales are fake: Learn to spot the signs of wash trading

In 2011, McCaleb sold Mt. Gox to Mark Karpeles, a French software developer who had previously worked on various projects, including an online marketplace called “Magic: The Gathering Online Exchange.” Karpeles moved the company’s headquarters to Tokyo and began to expand its operations, opening up new markets and adding support for additional cryptocurrencies. This transformed Mt. Gox into the most prominent crypto trading ecosystem of the early 2010s.

The hack

In February 2014, Mt. Gox abruptly halted all withdrawals from its platform, citing technical issues and security concerns. The company’s website went offline, and rumors circulated that the exchange had been hacked. A few days later, Karpeles held a press conference in Tokyo where he confirmed that Mt. Gox had indeed been hacked, and miscreants had stolen 850,000 Bitcoin — worth approximately $450 million at the time.

The Mt. Gox hack was one of the largest thefts in the history of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, and it had a significant impact on the broader industry. The price of Bitcoin dropped sharply in the days following the announcement, with many investors and traders losing confidence in the security and reliability of digital currency exchanges.

Mt. Gox hack aftermath

In the months following the Mt. Gox hack, there was great uncertainty and confusion about what had happened to the stolen Bitcoin, and who was responsible for the theft. Karpeles initially claimed that the coins had been stolen due to a “bug” in Mt. Gox’s software, but experts and members of the Bitcoin community widely criticized this explanation.

In March 2014, Mt. Gox filed for bankruptcy protection in Japan, and Japanese authorities seized the company’s assets. Karpeles was eventually arrested and charged with embezzlement and fraud in connection with the exchange’s collapse, but he has consistently maintained his innocence, claiming that he was simply a victim of circumstances beyond his control.

Logarithmic Bitcoin price chart on Mt. Gox from February 2012–February 2014. Source: Bitcoincharts

The Mt. Gox bankruptcy proceedings were complicated and protracted, with multiple legal challenges and competing claims from creditors and investors. In 2018, a Japanese court ruled that Mt. Gox’s assets should be liquidated and distributed among its creditors — a process that is still ongoing.

How are the reimbursement proceedings going?

In 2018, after several years of legal battles and investigations, a Japanese court approved a plan to compensate the victims of the Mt. Gox hack. The plan, which a court-appointed trustee proposed, called for the creation of a trust to hold the remaining Bitcoin and distribute them to the creditors. The trustee, Nobuaki Kobayashi, was tasked with overseeing the distribution of the remaining funds.

The first step in the plan was to convert the remaining Bitcoin into cash. The trustee sold over 35,000 BTC and 34,000 Bitcoin Cash (BCH) on various cryptocurrency exchanges, raising over $400 million. This was a significant achievement, as it represented the largest sale of cryptocurrency by a single entity in history.

Delays galore

In March 2020, the trustee announced that a new system had been implemented to allow creditors to make claims for the remaining funds. Creditors were required to submit proof of their claim, including documentation such as bank statements, transaction records and identification documents. The deadline for submitting claims was set for October 2020, which was subsequently pushed back to December.

In December 2020, the trustee announced that it had received claims from 99.9% of the creditors. The total amount of claims submitted was approximately $16 billion, which was significantly higher than the remaining funds available for distribution. This presented a significant challenge for Kobayashi, as he had to determine how to distribute the remaining funds fairly.

In January 2021, the trustee submitted a draft rehabilitation plan to the court. The plan proposed that the remaining funds be distributed in Bitcoin rather than cash, as this would avoid the need to sell the remaining cryptocurrency and risk affecting the market. The plan also proposed that the creditors be given the option to receive reimbursement in Bitcoin or cash, with the conversion rate based on the market price at the time of distribution.

As expected, the proposed rehabilitation plan received mixed reactions from the creditors. Some creditors welcomed the plan, as it offered the possibility of a higher reimbursement if the price of Bitcoin increased. However, others were skeptical, as the value of Bitcoin is highly volatile and subject to significant fluctuations. Some creditors also expressed concerns about the potential tax implications of receiving reimbursement in Bitcoin.

Recent developments

During the first week of September 2022, Kobayashi announced that former Mt. Gox customers had until Sept. 15 to make or transfer a claim. This date was then pushed back to Jan. 10, 2023, with Kobayashi urging creditors to complete the necessary steps before the deadline.

Kobayashi informed creditors that those individuals who failed to do so would be unable to receive their funds quickly or would be required to supply several documents to the firm’s head office in Japan. Even then, they would only be able to receive payments in Japanese yen.

However, the deadline was moved to March 10, citing the “progress by rehabilitation creditors” in the selection and registration as a reason for the change. In fact, as part of a March 7 announcement, the trustee reiterated a January notice reminding creditors who had not registered for repayment that they had until March 10 to do so — two additional months as part of the rehabilitation plan proposed earlier.

Kobayashi did not provide a reason for the extension, which would allow individuals who suffered losses at Mt. Gox to select a repayment method and register their information in an online rehabilitation claim filing system.

Additionally, it bears mentioning that amid all these changes, Mt. Gox Investment Fund — the largest creditor of the defunct crypto exchange — opted for an early payout in Bitcoin rather than wait longer for a larger payment after a legal battle. The early payout meant creditors would receive approximately 90% of what was due. The bankruptcy trustee doesn’t have to sell tokens to acquire fiat funds for the payment since the creditor also chose to be paid in BTC.

Most recently, the timeline for filing claims and distribution of assets to Mt. Gox creditors seems to have been amended again. As per an official announcement, the deadline for filing claims has been extended by another month, from March 10 to April 6, 2023, allowing creditors to register their claims for an additional period. The distribution of assets has also been pushed back by another month, with the process now starting on Oct. 31 instead of Sept. 30.

The official statement released by the Mt. Gox trustee cited several reasons for the delay in the deadlines, including the progress made by rehabilitation creditors in terms of selection and registration. Creditors have multiple options for receiving payments, including a lump-sum payment, bank remittance, via a transfer service provider or a cryptocurrency exchange or custodian.

Lessons learned and looking ahead

One crucial lesson learned from the Mt. Gox collapse is the value of transparency and accountability. Many critics argued that the hack’s severity was partly due to the exchange’s opacity and secrecy regarding its operations. Nowadays, reputable cryptocurrency exchanges are relatively more transparent, with some frequently publishing audits and reports to reassure customers and investors.

Recent: Silicon Valley Bank’s downfall has many causes, but crypto isn’t one

Another lesson from the Mt. Gox failure was the need for better risk management and financial controls. In the early days of Bitcoin, many exchanges were run by tech enthusiasts and entrepreneurs with little to no experience in finance or risk management. Today, exchanges have more professional and experienced management teams implementing better financial controls and risk management practices.

Lastly, the Mt. Gox hack revealed the necessity for improved regulation and oversight of the cryptocurrency industry. Since the collapse, regulators worldwide have proposed new rules and regulations to protect investors and traders, including stricter Anti-Money Laundering and Know Your Customer requirements. While some may view these regulations as excessively restrictive, others believe they are necessary to prevent fraud and safeguard consumers.

The Mt. Gox incident continues to serve as a cautionary tale regarding digital assets’ potential risks and dangers, emphasizing the need for greater transparency, accountability and risk management.

Mt. Gox registration deadline pushed for another month

Mt. Gox creditors have another month to file for their claims as the registration deadline was pushed back by another month.

The registration dates for Mt. Gox creditors have been pushed back by another month. According to the announcement, the deadline has been moved from March 10 to April 6, allowing creditors to file claims for another month.

The distribution deadline has been pushed back by another month as well. The distribution of assets to creditors will now start from Oct. 31 instead of Sept. 30.

The official document cited various circumstances for the shift in deadlines, such as the progress by rehabilitation creditors in respect of the selection and registration. Creditors have the option of a lump-sum payment, bank remittance, fund transfer service provider or going through a cryptocurrency exchange or custodian.

Creditors have been waiting for years to get compensated for losses incurred because of the exchange hack in 2014. Mt. Gox was a Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange that once accounted for more than 70% of Bitcoin transactions. In 2014, the exchange was hacked and filed for bankruptcy after thousands of Bitcoin (BTC) were stolen.

As Cointelegraph reported in February, Mt. Gox Investment Fund — the largest creditor of the defunct crypto exchange — chose to have an early payout in Bitcoin rather than wait longer for an even larger payment after a legal battle. The early payout meant creditors would receive approximately 90% of what was due. The bankruptcy trustee doesn’t have to sell tokens to acquire fiat funds for the payment since the creditor also chose to be paid in BTC.

The extension in deadline means other creditors will have another month to decide whether to take the lower amount now or wait another nine years to get the full amount. 

The Mt. Gox creditor payout has been in focus for quite some time now, especially considering the value of BTC has increased multifold since the exchange went bust. There has been speculation about the impact of Mt. Gox creditors on the market if they decided to sell their holdings. However, a report from Bloomberg has noted that the largest Mt. Gox creditors have no plans to sell their BTC.

Tel Aviv Stock Exchange’s crypto trading proposal a ‘closed-loop system’

Israeli crypto users will soon have a new means of regulated crypto trading, but the local ecosystem is not convinced that this is what the crypto industry needs.

When the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE), the only public stock exchange in Israel, announced that it drafted a proposal for regulation-friendly crypto trading on Feb. 27, it echoed across the crypto industry as a step forward for crypto adoption. However, some experts have framed the proposal as a somewhat underwhelming update to the current crypto landscape in Israel. 

In short, the TASE proposes that only authorized brokerages act as fiat-to-crypto onramps, aided by licensed crypto trading providers. The stock exchange said that it designed the framework to mitigate risks and enhance consumer protection. Without a specific timeframe, the proposal will be sent for approval by the TASE board of directors once the public comments have been submitted.

How TASE plans to conduct crypto trading

Non-banking members (NBM) of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange will play a vital role in the proposed crypto trading services. An NBM is an Israeli broker authorized by TASE. The official roster shows six brokerage firms with a TASE membership, including UBS Securities Israel, Meitav Trade and Fair Financial Technologies. If the proposal passes the board, these brokers will get in touch with two functions, a licensed crypto trading services provider and a licensed crypto custodian, in order to enable customers to deposit and withdraw fiat money to use for crypto investments.

When a customer wants to trade with crypto, they will need to start by depositing fiat money, Israeli shekels or a foreign currency, to their brokerage account. The broker will then deposit the same amount (still in fiat) in an omnibus account at the licensed crypto trading provider, or crypto exchange.

Recent: In crypto winter, DeFi needs an overhaul to mature and grow

As soon as the customer places the order to buy cryptocurrency, the actual purchase will be executed at the crypto exchange via the omnibus account. It will also be recorded in the customer’s brokerage account. Conversely, when a sell order is initiated, the crypto trading platform will sell the coins and send the sum to the same omnibus account as fiat money. From there, the same amount will be deposited back into the customer account at the brokerage.

One step forward

The stock exchange sees a regulatory framework for crypto trading as a means to upgrading the Israeli capital market in line with international standards, according to the announcement, which reads:

“TASE believes that the alignment of local regulation with international regulation will attract more foreign investments and foreign investments and foreign investors into the Israeli market, while at the same time will enable the Israeli public to invest locally, through supervised institutions.”

Ben Samocha, the CEO and co-founder of educational crypto platform CryptoJungle, referred to enabling crypto trading for authorized brokers as another milestone for crypto adoption in Israel. According to him, TASE’s proposal shows the crypto industry’s reputation is back on track after scandals surrounding FTX and Celsius damaged its credibility and trust.

Display in the lobby of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Source: Twitter

“Leading brokers such as Excellence and Meitav Trade are providing services for hundreds of thousands of Israelis,” Samocha said, adding that there have been many requests of them to offer crypto services, “especially in the last two years.”

While the nature of the TASE solution will make cryptocurrency more accessible as an investment vehicle, Samocha stressed that it’s not the best solution for the end user:

“Users will only be able to deposit and withdraw fiat, not crypto. The crypto itself will be held in custody by a third party. While it’s a step towards the right direction, we still have a long way to go.”

Mark Smargon, the founder and CEO of blockchain-based payment platform Fuse, agreed that the proposal is “not improving anything for the clients themselves.” Since the proposal only includes authorized brokerages that are members of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, Smargon believes that it won’t have much impact on non-public firms or banks.

Two steps back

Delving into technical details of the proposal, Smargon pointed out that it’s mainly for purchasing crypto “within a closed-loop system.” The idea of self custody goes out of the window with the TASE proposal, and users would need to invest in crypto via a select number of brokers and custodians. “That misses the point of the technological advantage of blockchain and only lets users speculate on asset prices,” he added.

Smargon highlighted the underwhelming impact the proposal would potentially have on the local crypto ecosystem, as “just a handful of licenses were issued while general bank acceptance is low.” He said:

“If the objective is to create clarity with listed companies that wish to provide crypto trading for their clients by giving a handful of centralized, authorized entities the rights to all the brokering and custody, then that sounds like one step forward and two steps backward.”

Aside from drafting a crypto trading framework that prioritizes tighter control for investor protection, the TASE is also working on advancing blockchain adoption within the country’s finance ecosystem. Together with the Israeli Ministry of Finance, digital assets custody provider Fireblocks and the United States-based tech provider VMware, TASE plans to pilot a blockchain-backed platform for trading digital bonds.

Recent: Is the IMF shutting the door prematurely on Bitcoin as legal tender?

Expected to be finished by the end of March, the pilot will see participating banks receiving a new series of tokenized government bonds in their e-wallets via the newly developed platform, transferring the money held in digital currencies to the Israeli government’s digital wallet.

Shira Greenberg, the chief economist at the Israeli Ministry of Finance, published a detailed report titled “Regulation of the Digital Assets Sector — Roadmap to a Policy” that focuses on the rise of digital currencies and how policymakers can tackle the legal aspect of crypto. Greenberg recommended strict licensing requirements for trading providers and issuers of cryptocurrencies to keep investors protected.

Binance launches anti-scam campaign after Hong Kong pilot run

The new campaign features a withdrawal warning message that attempts to prevent users from sending their crypto to scammers.

Binance, in cooperation with law enforcement agencies, is launching a campaign to prevent scams by issuing targeted alerts to potential victims, according to a March 3 blog post from the company. The project, called the “Joint Anti-Scam Campaign,” was rolled out first in Hong Kong, and the company now intends to expand it into other jurisdictions.

According to the company’s post, it collaborated with the Hong Police Force’s Cyber Security and Technology Crime Bureau to build an “alert and crime prevention message” targeted at Hong Kong residents. As part of the pilot project, when users tried to make withdrawals, they were subjected to warning messages that gave them information about common scams and tips on how to avoid scams.

Over the course of four weeks, Binance investigated customers’ responses to the messages. It found that approximately 20.4% of users either decided not to make the withdrawal or investigated further to determine whether the transaction might be a scam.

The warning gave statistics on the number of scams that occurred in Hong Kong in 2001 and recommended resources such as Scameter, the Anti Deception Coordination Center, Cyber Defender and Binance Verify. It also instructed users that Binance will never call them directly.

Related: Scam alert: Trezor warns users of new phishing attack

Binance considers the pilot program to have been a success, and it plans to collaborate with police in other jurisdictions to make tailor-made warning messages for customers outside of Hong Kong.

Social engineering and phishing scams have been recurring problems for crypto users. In February, scammers allegedly created a fake version of the ETHDenver convention website, which they then used to trick users into giving away their crypto by calling a function on a malicious contract. Over $300,000 worth of crypto is believed to have been stolen through the scam. In another example, an influential nonfungible token promoter had over $300,000 worth of CryptoPunks removed from his wallet when he was apparently fooled into interacting with a phishing site.