elections

US Election update: Where do the pro-crypto candidates stand ahead of the election?

Crypto has been highly visible in this election cycle thanks to polls and political action committees. This is a new and unaccustomed role for it with unknown results.

The 2022 midterm elections will be held in the United States on Nov. 8. Thirty-four senators and all 435 members of the House of Representatives will be running. According to media reports, cryptocurrency lobbyists and political action committees have poured millions of dollars into select campaigns, and extensive polling has shown crypto to be on voters’ minds.

Fundraising and polling are normal parts of the American political system, but the numbers associated with crypto may have raised some eyebrows. Sam Bankman-Fried called $1 billion his “soft ceiling” for 2022 election contributions, for example. Even though he backpedaled on some of his intentions, he remains the sixth-largest donor in this election cycle. There are numerous crypto-related political action committees as well. According to Bloomberg, as of Oct. 19, crypto-affiliated donors had spent more than donors to such traditional recipients as defense and big pharma.

A poll commissioned by Grayscale between Oct. 6 and Oct. 11 shows that 38% of voters surveyed will be “considering crypto policy positions.” A poll commissioned by the Crypto Council for Innovation at roughly the same time showed that 45% of voters “want legislators to treat crypto as a serious and valid part of the economy.”

Why all the excitement?

Crypto is making continual inroads into daily life, even in the current unfavorable market conditions. Nonetheless, someone with some distance from the industry may be surprised to hear that 45% of potential American voters have any opinion about crypto at all. 

But, 40 million Americans own crypto, and they take it personally, Cornell Law School faculty member and Foley & Lardner partner Patrick Daugherty told Cointelegraph:

“Does ‘crypto policy’ resonate with voters as much as inflation and other headline news? Probably not, but then again many voters are buying crypto as a hedge against inflation.”

Furthermore, “Crypto is the future of money, which is important to every American,” Daugherty said. 

Martin Dobelle, one of the three co-founders of political software company Engage, agreed. “The average person cares more about this issue than you might expect,” he said. Dobelle attributed voter interest in crypto to a generally positive attitude toward technology, especially among the young. He told Cointelegraph:

“Voters are very pro-technology, pro-innovation and they […] might not know the specifics of crypto legislation or tech legislation writ large, but they do have kind of an intuitive sense of […] what policy thinking that moves in the direction of embracing technology and innovation would look like.”

Engage is a public benefit corporation with a mission to increase public participation in the political process. Among its activities, Engage raises funds in cryptocurrency for 16 pro-crypto candidates.

What are we doing here?

The next logical question is what crypto voters will accomplish. Pro-crypto House members like Minnesota Republican Tom Emmer and Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden expect to win their races easily, while Ohio Democrat Tim Ryan is facing off against equally pro-crypto Republican JD Vance. Not only that, the crypto regulation situation is relatively under control, with bills already in the House and Senate.

Recent: How low liquidity led to Mango Markets losing over $116 million

Hogan Lovells partner Aaron Cutler saw a limited connection between the election and upcoming crypto regulation. “I don’t think it’s a question of political support, but more a question of policy priorities,” he said, adding:

“This is one of the reasons we saw certain legislation introduced this Congress — not because it was going to be passed and enacted into law, but because Members want to show leadership and stake out a bit of legislative turf.”

On the other hand, seeing that existing bills come up for voting faster is probably one of the effects greater political support would have.

The other effect of voting is keeping some candidates out of office. Attacks against crypto are perceived by many American voters “as threats to economic security and personal liberty,” Daugherty said.

Willamette University law professor Rohan Grey was having none of the single-issue votings. Pollsters “aren’t saying that they [pro-crypto candidates] are good people,” he said. Grey saw voting as important as an action. “Give the impression of people coming to your cool party,” he said. 

To Dobelle, the increase in political activity surrounding crypto was significant as a sign that crypto is moving into the middle of the political spectrum, which he said is “past due.”

Whose party is it?

The bipartisan/nonpartisan nature of crypto is often commented on, but there are clear divisions in the crypto world. First, crypto skews right. This can be seen, among other places, in the Crypto Action Network politicians’ scorecards. That organization has graded 144 U.S. legislators on their crypto support. (The remaining nearly 400 lawmakers presumably have no record of crypto.) The scorecards gave Republicans an average grade of 3.4 out of 4, converted from A-F marks, while Democrats received an average of 2.1. 

Bipartisanship legislation is full of “sensible compromises,” according to Daugherty, and has a better chance of passing in the current polarized environment. Cutler concurred, although he added that his firm foresees “Republican-led committee oversight and investigations of agencies with jurisdiction over digital assets and cryptocurrency.”

Grey, an adherent of Modern Monetary Policy, had a simple explanation for crypto’s right leanings based on its origins in libertarian economics and the Cypherpunks:

“The problem being solved by crypto is an inherently right-wing one.”

Grey saw one only result from any foreseeable election outcome: Crypto’s “handover to big business.”

Recent: The state of crypto in Southern Europe: Malta leads the way

Whether those claims are accepted or not, they point to an old, basic dichotomy: Crypto as the Wild West — alternative and unregulated money — and crypto regulated and integrated into the economic mainstream. In this light, the 2022 midterm elections are a rehash of a familiar trope and some slight movement toward its resolution.

Digital Chamber of Commerce vice president of policy Cody Carbone wrote in one of his many tweets, “Crypto has not yet become a mainstream part of candidate platforms. Given user adoption trends, that WILL change for the 2024 election. It’s up to voters and industry, to make sure our voices are heard.”

FTX exec revealed as big donor to Oregon Democrats following misidentification

The FTX director of engineering reportedly contributed $500,000 to the Democratic Party of the American state of Oregon.

A senior FTX executive has been revealed as the reported mystery donor behind a massive $500,000 contribution to the Democratic Party of the American state of Oregon.

According to local reports, the Oregon Democrats initially told state election officials that the $500,000 donation was from Prime Trust, a crypto-focused fintech in Nevada.

However, on Nov. 1, the party director revealed the true source behind the donation was FTX Engineering Director Nishad Singh, who has been the state Democratic Party’s fourth largest donor since Nov. 2020. 

Apparently, there was initial confusion about who was behind the half-a-million-dollar donation. 

State party executive director Brad Martin told OregonLive in a statement that “Based upon documentation received from our bank” in October, the party “reasonably believed this contribution was, in fact from Prime Trust LLC.”

Weeks after the Oct. 4 donation, and after local media questioned why a Las Vegas start-up made such a sizeable contribution, Martin reportedly received communication from Singh on Oct. 28 revealing that “he had made a personal contribution to the (Democratic Party of Oregon) and that Prime Trust LLC was not the donor.”

A spokesperson for Prime Trust also further clarified on Nov. 1 to OregonLive that “this is not Prime Trust contributing money to the PAC. It’s merely Prime Trust effectuating the transfer on behalf of a customer.”

The party has since amended its state campaign finance disclose to reflect the true donor, according to reports. 

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried could spend up to $1B in 2024 to thwart Trump comeback

The nature of the contribution may not be a surprise to some. Singh has been tied to political donations through Prime Trust in the past, while Oregon politics has been the object of FTX’s attention before.

An April Politico report found that a $14 million contribution from Prime Trust to the Protect Our Future PAC backed by FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried was made up of $1 million from Singh with the rest from Bankman-Fried, as confirmed by FTX.

At the time, FTX declined to comment on why the funds were directed through Prime Trust, and a Prime Trust spokesperson only said this type of transaction was “commonplace.”

Bankman-Fried’s Protect Our Future super PAC also allegedly donated between $8 million and $10 million to the campaign of Carrick Flynn — a political novice and family friend running in a newly created U.S. House of representatives district outside Portland.

Prime Trust and Singh were instrumental in those donations as well, according to NGO Open Secrets.

Cointelegraph reached out to the Democratic Party of Oregon and Brad Martin, but did not receive any response by time of publication.

38% of US voters will consider candidates’ position on crypto in midterms: Survey

Initiated by Grayscale, the survey suggests crypto regulation is a bipartisan issue, with the majority of Democratic and Republican respondents saying they want clarity.

Roughly a third of eligible voters in the United States will be “considering crypto policy positions” when choosing candidates in the 2022 midterm elections, according to a new survey.

In the results of a 2,029-person survey conducted by The Harris Poll between Oct. 6 and 11, 57% of likely midterm voters say they would be more likely to vote for a political candidate interested in staying informed about cryptocurrencies, while 38% said they would consider positions on crypto policy when voting in the midterms. The survey, initiated by Grayscale Investments, also suggests that crypto regulation is a bipartisan issue, with 87% of Democratic and 76% of Republican respondents saying they want clarity from the U.S. government.

“Voters and lawmakers alike have been hearing about crypto, and it seems they’ve taken the opportunity to learn about the asset class,” says the Grayscale summary. “Despite political divisions, the survey found broad familiarity with crypto across party lines and a majority of both Republicans and Democrats who agree that crypto represents the future of finance.”

Early voting for the U.S. midterms has already begun in many states, with Election Day set for Nov. 8. The future majority control of both the House of Representatives and Senate hangs in the balance, with a number of issues driving many voters to the polls, including abortion, gun control, free and fair elections, and the economy — including crypto.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Jeff Howard, North American head of business development at digital assets platform OSL, suggested that many may consider digital assets as part of financial inclusion efforts, but the space largely isn’t big enough to appeal to single-issue voters in the United States:

“I don’t think crypto has seeped into the psyche of American voters as much yet. In every topic or every issue, you have a hardcore group that supports or a group that is against, but I don’t think crypto in and of itself as a one-issue vote has gotten big enough to matter yet.”

Related: Crypto and decentralization could influence voters in 2022 US midterm elections: Report

In the current session of Congress, 220 representatives in the House caucus with the Democrats, while Republicans hold 212 seats, and three remain vacant. All 435 House seats are up for election, as are 34 of those in the Senate. Democrats currently hold control of both chambers by a slim majority, giving Republicans a chance to flip both on Nov. 8.

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva wins Brazil’s presidential race — What does this mean for crypto?

The future president reportedly said that cryptocurrencies “deserved the attention of authorities,” calling for Brazil’s central bank to create a framework for digital assets.

In a close race with outgoing Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, also known simply as “Lula,” won the country’s presidential election following a run-off race.

According to data from Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, Lula defeated Bolsonaro in an Oct. 30 run-off election with 50.9% of the vote — roughly 60.3 million people to the soon-to-be former president’s 58.2 million. Though the election outcome showed Lula has the right to take office starting in January 2023, reports have suggested that Bolsonaro may intend to challenge the results.

Lula, who also served as the president of Brazil from 2003 to 2010, reportedly said in October that cryptocurrencies “deserved the attention of authorities,” calling for the country’s central bank to create a framework for digital assets aligned with international standards on Anti-Money Laundering and illicit practices. He is also allied with former central bank president Henrique Meirelles, who took an advisory role at crypto exchange Binance in September but reportedly may be considering a position in Lula’s government.

During his presidential campaign, Lula announced that his plan for Brazil’s government had been registered on the Decred blockchain as an example of “an innovative and incorruptible technology of records distributed by computers around the world that is also behind Bitcoin.” However, the future president has largely not publicly spoken on crypto and blockchain.

Related: Brazil’s Rio de Janeiro will accept crypto-payments for property taxes

Cointelegraph reported that more than 12,000 Brazil-based companies held crypto as of August, suggesting that digital assets may play a larger role in the country’s economy in the future. Some lawmakers have also proposed bills aimed at making crypto payments legal in Brazil.

Crypto Council for Innovation poll sees crypto voters as a force to be reckoned with

The new data show crypto ownership is comparable to that of other assets and especially strong among the young; crypto is seen more favorably than banks in some quarters.

A poll conducted by the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) has shown that a candidate’s position on crypto may impact the outcome of the United States midterm elections. Significant numbers of voters are well-disposed toward crypto and want to see it treated as a serious and valid part of the economy, and bipartisanship is strong in the crypto community.

The CCI commissioned a poll of 1,208 people on Oct. 8-10 about their attitudes toward crypto and the upcoming elections. The poll found that 13% of respondents won cryptocurrency, which is in line with the 16% who owned stocks and 12% who owned mutual funds and ahead of the 5% of bondholders.

CCI chief strategist of political affairs and former Colorado senator Cory Gardner said the numbers indicate a bloc that may exert influence over the coming elections. Gardner told Cointelegraph:

“A percentage here and a percentage there could change the outlook of an election […] especially when an election can be won by thousands of votes, not hundreds of thousands of votes.”

Independents (17%), Hispanic Americans (18%), African Americans (18%) and young voters (20%) owned crypto at higher-than-average rates. The majority of Latino and African American respondents had a more favorable view of crypto and credit unions than banks. CCI communications director Amanda Russo told Cointelegraph:

“There’s a new segment of the population that this is resonating with as a new onramp to financial access and freedom.”

Another notable finding of the poll was that respondents showed a preference for social media (36%) over traditional news outlets (31%) as sources of financial information. “Regulators have to understand where people get their information from” to understand their mission, Gardner said.

Related: Almost 50% of Gen Z and Millennials want crypto in retirement funds: Survey

While 36% of respondents wanted to see crypto “treated as a mechanism for fraud and abuse,” 45% “want legislators to treat crypto as a serious and valid part of the economy,” and 52% think that crypto needs more regulation. The divide between proponents and opponents of crypto is not divided along party lines, however. Gardner said:

“The partisanship of crypto is not left or right. […] The partisanship of crypto is crypto.”

CCI intends to repeat the poll quarterly.

DataVault requests US election agency’s advice to send NFTs as a campaign fundraising incentive

The firm planned to market NFTs “in a manner akin to a campaign hat or souvenirs,” intending to have political committees offer them to high-volume low-dollar donors.

The legal team behind nonfungible token firm DataVault Holdings has requested an advisory opinion from the United States Federal Election Commission on using NFTs for fundraising efforts.

In a Sept. 21 letter to FEC acting general counsel Lisa Stevenson, DataVault’s lawyers proposed sending NFTs as “souvenirs” to individuals who contributed to political committees, as well as giving the token holder the option to use it for promoting a campaign “strictly on a volunteer basis and without any compensation.” The NFT firm requested the FEC provide guidance on how it may operate as a commercial vendor — issuing the tokens to political committee members seemingly without violating federal campaign finance laws.

“DataVault’s activities to political committees will be conducted on a strictly commercial basis and DataVault will not seek to influence, affirmatively or negatively, the nomination or election of any candidate to Federal office,” said DataVault’s counsel Elliot Berke. “DataVault would provide the NFTs to political committees in the same manner and normal course of business as other non-political committee clients.”

According to DataVault’s proposals, the firm planned to market NFTs “in a manner akin to a campaign hat or souvenirs,” intending to have political committees offer them to high-volume low-dollar donors. The tokens could be used for VIP access at different campaign events, or contain artwork or literature related to a candidate’s policies. Any fees from issuing NFTs or transactions would be reported as a “fundraising expenditure,” according to DataVault’s example scenario:

“An NFT is priced at $10.00 and is provided by DataVault to a campaign committee. The NFT is offered by the campaign committee to contributors who make a $10.00 contribution. Once the campaign committee collects a contribution connected with the NFT, it records the $10.00 contribution and pays DataVault a fee of $3.00 as a usual and normal fundraising expenditure.”

DataVault’s legal team requested the FEC provide clarification on whether the firm could “design and market NFTs to political committees” as well as provide the tokens to incentivize contributors. In a 2019 advisory opinion on NFTs, the commission determined tokens were “materially indistinguishable from traditional forms of campaign souvenirs” such as buttons.

“The distribution of valueless blockchain tokens is not a form of compensation for volunteers’ services but rather a novel means for volunteers and supporters to show their support for the campaign,” said the FEC at the time. “The Commission found the valueless tokens to be analogous to more traditional forms of campaign souvenirs, and concluded that nothing in the Act or Commission regulations would limit or prohibit their distribution.”

Related: Crypto and decentralization could influence voters in 2022 US midterm elections: Report

Political figures outside the FEC’s purview have taken similar initiatives. Prior to South Korea’s presidential election in March, Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung’s campaign said it would issue NFTs showing images of the politician and his campaign pledges to those who donated money, in an effort to appeal to the younger generation. In California, NFTs were at the center of a discussion among members of the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission in March, later leading to the independent body reversing a 2018 ban on crypto donations for candidates for state and local offices.

DataVault requests US election agency’s advice to send NFTs as a campaign fundraising incentive

The firm planned to market NFTs “in a manner akin to a campaign hat or souvenirs,” intending to have political committees offer them to high-volume low-dollar donors.

The legal team behind nonfungible token (NFT) firm DataVault Holdings has requested an advisory opinion from the United States Federal Election Commission on using NFTs for fundraising efforts.

In a Sept. 21 letter to FEC Acting General Counsel Lisa Stevenson, DataVault’s lawyers proposed sending NFTs as “souvenirs” to individuals who contributed to political committees, as well as giving the tokenholder the option to use it for promoting a campaign “strictly on a volunteer basis and without any compensation.” The NFT firm requested the FEC provide guidance on how it may operate as a commercial vendor — issuing the tokens to political committee members seemingly without violating federal campaign finance laws.

“DataVault’s activities to political committees will be conducted on a strictly commercial basis and DataVault will not seek to influence, affirmatively or negatively, the nomination or election of any candidate to Federal office,” said DataVault counsel Elliot Berke. “DataVault would provide the NFTs to political committees in the same manner and normal course of business as other non-political committee clients.”

According to DataVault’s proposals, the firm planned to market NFTs “in a manner akin to a campaign hat or souvenirs,” intending to have political committees offer them to high-volume low-dollar donors. The tokens could be used for VIP access at different campaign events, or contain artwork or literature related to a candidate’s policies. Any fees from issuing NFTs or transactions would be reported as a “fundraising expenditure,” according to DataVault’s example scenario:

“An NFT is priced at $10.00 and is provided by DataVault to a campaign committee. The NFT is offered by the campaign committee to contributors who make a $10.00 contribution. Once the campaign committee collects a contribution connected with the NFT, it records the $10.00 contribution and pays DataVault a fee of $3.00 as a usual and normal fundraising expenditure.”

DataVault’s legal team requested the FEC provide clarification on whether the firm could “design and market NFTs to political committees” as well as provide the tokens to incentivize contributors. In a 2019 advisory opinion on NFTs, the commission determined tokens were “materially indistinguishable from traditional forms of campaign souvenirs” such as buttons.

“The distribution of valueless blockchain tokens is not a form of compensation for volunteers’ services but rather a novel means for volunteers and supporters to show their support for the campaign,” said the FEC at the time. “The Commission found the valueless tokens to be analogous to more traditional forms of campaign souvenirs, and concluded that nothing in the Act or Commission regulations would limit or prohibit their distribution.”

Related: Crypto and decentralization could influence voters in 2022 US midterm elections: Report

Political figures outside the FEC’s purview have taken similar initiatives. Prior to South Korea’s presidential election in March, Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung’s campaign said it would issue NFTs showing images of the politician and his campaign pledges to those who donated money in an effort to appeal to the younger generation. In California, NFTs were at the center of a discussion among members of the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission in March, later leading to the independent body reversing a 2018 ban on crypto donations for candidates for state and local offices.

Crypto and decentralization could influence voters in 2022 US midterm elections: Report

“Voters are less likely to support candidates perceived as standing in the way of a decentralized internet,” said Haun Ventures.

A poll of 800 likely midterm voters in four U.S. swing states suggested that the overwhelming majority favored ideas around decentralization, and many were HODLers.

According to a Sept. 29 report from venture capital firm Haun Ventures on a survey conducted by business intelligence company Morning Consult, roughly one in five voters polled in New Hampshire, Nevada, Ohio and Pennsylvania said they owned cryptocurrency or nonfungible tokens. In addition, 91% of respondents supported a “community owned, community governed” internet that “gives people greater control over their information.”

Poll of 800 swing state voters who own digital assets. Source: Haun Ventures

“Significantly, and reflective of how the values that voters associate with Web3 will drive electoral behavior, voters are less likely to support candidates perceived as standing in the way of a decentralized internet,” said Haun Ventures. “In other words, as both parties consider how good Web3 policy will translate into good politics, the values of Web3 are what voters want to see elected officials supporting, not standing in the way of.”

The survey noted that the voters polled leaned slightly Democratic, but promoting a decentralized and democratized internet seemed to be a bipartisan issue, with both sides having “limited faith in the government’s ability” to regulate Web3. Haun Ventures reported that 55% of voters surveyed would be less likely to vote for political candidates who opposed internet decentralization policies, while 72% of HODLers in the poll said they owned digital assets “because they want an economic system that is more democratized, fair, and works for more people.”

“This poll makes it clear that in these swing states, Web3 Voters now represent a significant cohort of the middle class electorate, and are younger and more diverse than the population as a whole.”

Source: Haun Ventures

Related: US lawmaker hints at calling for Republican votes in 2022 midterms over crypto policies

The poll targeted people planning to vote in the 2022 midterm elections in the United States, to be held in November with candidates taking office in January. Morning Consult conducted the survey from Sept. 15–20. Katie Haun, a Coinbase board member and former board member for OpenSea, raised $1.5 billion to form Haun Ventures in March for investments in Web3.