Bitcoin mining

Bitcoin miner Mawson to defer all major capital expenditures until market conditions normalize

The bear market is affecting all segments of the crypto industry, including Bitcoin miners, which have seen their revenues decline sharply this year.

On Tuesday, Bitcoin (BTC) mining company Mawson Infrastructure Group said that it was suspending major capital expenditures until market conditions normalize. In addition, the firm is voluntarily reducing its energy use, also called demand response, in light of the market sell-off and high electricity prices due to inflation. 

Mawson received its final shipment of Canann A1246 ASIC Bitcoin Miners in June and has no further outstanding payments due for Bitcoin mining rigs. Regarding the company’s decision, CEO and founder James Manning said:

“Despite a volatile market, Mawson is currently continuing to self-mine and is also participating in energy demand response programs where applicable. Additionally, we are fortunate to have no outstanding contracts to purchase ASIC Bitcoin Miners, enabling us to focus on developing our co-location business as an alternate revenue stream while the Bitcoin price is suppressed.

In its latest monthly update, Mawson disclosed that it owned over 40,000 Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) Bitcoin mining machines. Combined, the rigs have an estimated hash rate of 3.35 exahash per second, accounting for approximately 1.675% of the Bitcoin network’s total hash rate. Last year, the firm generated $19.4 million in total revenue and spent $6.03 million in capital expenditures, or purchasing property and equipment. 

Related: Compass Mining loses facility after allegedly failing to pay power bill

The ongoing cryptocurrency bear market has hit Bitcoin miners hard, with reports that miners sold their entire May harvest. Mining revenues in the sector have since fallen to May 2021 lows. Meanwhile, energy costs have skyrocketed partly due to the fallout of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Due to such a mixture of risk factors, the Bitcoin network’s total hash rate has plunged nearly 25% in the past two weeks alone. 

Switzerland-based crypto mining firm expands operations to Texas

The company reported its operations in the United States will have an initial capacity of 3 megawatts, aiming for the firm’s total hashrate to be more than 1.6 EH/s.

White Rock Management, a cryptocurrency mining company based in Switzerland, said it will be expanding its operations to the United States, starting with Texas.

In a Tuesday announcement, White Rock said it will be partnering with Natural Gas Onsite Neutralization, or NGON, a company that captures natural gas that would otherwise be burned and converts it to energy for use in the firm’s Bitcoin (BTC) mining operations. White Rock said it will be operating out of NGON’s facility in the Brazos Valley region, mining BTC using “environmentally responsible” methods.

According to White Rock CEO Andy Long, the move into Texas was just the first in the firm’s plans to expand its BTC mining operations to areas capable of providing energy from natural gas outside the scope of the state’s power grid. The company began mining crypto at data centers in Sweden in November 2021 and reported its operations in the United States will have an initial capacity of 3 megawatts, aiming for the firm’s total hashrate to be more than 1.6 EH/s.

Crypto mining firm White Rock Management’s operations in Texas. Source: White Rock

The recent market downturn — the price of Bitcoin has fallen more than 28% in the last 30 days — may be impacting crypto miners’ profits. Cointelegraph reported on June 10 that the “raw” costs for miners in North America were roughly $22,000 per Bitcoin, with additional costs potentially bringing the total to more than $30,000. Many mining firms in the region including Bitfarms have reported selling some of their BTC holdings amid the bear market.

It’s unclear how the recent volatility may affect White Rock’s operations in the Lone Star State. Long told Cointelegraph the firm was “able to mine profitably in bear and bull markets” due in part to having the latest generation of rigs. 

“Our U.S. facility perfectly compliments our Swedish 100% hydroelectric powered sites and we see a great deal of opportunity in the current turbulent market conditions,” said Long. “In particular we expect there to be attractive opportunities for [mergers and acquisitions] and consolidation between public and privately held miners.”

Related: Bitcoin miners sold their entire May harvest: Report

Prior to the market downturn, Argo Blockchain said it was planning to launch operations in Texas’ Dickens County almost a year after first breaking ground — the 200-megawatt data center started mining in May. In April, the City of Fort Worth also launched a pilot program to mine BTC using three rigs in its city hall building.

Resistance is futile! 3 reasons why Bitcoin mining will never go away

Numerous governments have tried to ban Bitcoin mining, but data and insights from those in the mining industry suggest that this is easier said than done.

In the summer of 2021, the Chinese government banned Bitcoin (BTC) mining and cited the typical concerns of harmful environmental effects and money laundering. Now, the Chinese government is working toward establishing its own digital yuan currency. This raises the question as to whether the original reasoning was merely a Trojan horse.

This ban could easily have been a huge blow to Bitcoin’s momentum. After all, close to 75% of all Bitcoin mining had been conducted in China by late 2019, according to Cambridge Alternative Finance Benchmarks. If the network teetered under the weight of China’s nationwide ban, other governments might have begun to think that Bitcoin could be defeated after all.

China’s ban was Bitcoin’s stress test

For a brief period, the ban worked as intended — by the end of June 2021, the Bitcoin network’s hash rate had dropped to 57.47 exahashes per second (EH/s), down by a few multiples. However, the hash rate rebounded to 193.64 EH/s by December 2021 and by February 2022, it reached an all-time high of 248.11 EH/s.

The entire ordeal was a test that Bitcoin passed with flying colors: Banning Bitcoin mining proved as effective as the Prohibition era was at killing drinking culture in the United States.

In early 2022, the obvious explanation for the hash rate recovery was that miners who had set up shop in China had simply fled to the Western Hemisphere. There was plenty of evidence that seemed to support this hypothesis — primarily that the United States’ share of the global hash rate exploded from 4.1% in late 2019 to 35.4% in August 2021.

Share of global Bitcoin hashrate. Source: University of Cambridge, Reuters

The ban created a decentralized black market

However, the so-called “great migration” may not have been the only unintended consequence of China’s ban. As of May 2022, miners in China accounted for 22% of the global hash rate — a figure that is not as dominant as before, but no small slice of the pie, either.

As the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance reports:

“It is probable that a non-trivial share of Chinese miners quickly adapted to the new circumstances and continued operating covertly while hiding their tracks using foreign proxy services to deflect attention and scrutiny.”

Indeed, it’s likely that there is now a massive black market of Bitcoin mining in China.

Try as they might, one of the most authoritarian regimes on the planet cannot prevent its citizens from mining Bitcoin. In economic terms, the potential benefits to the China-based miners outweigh the costs associated with getting caught red-handed.

Despite the concern and skepticism that “experts” broadcast about Bitcoin, miners in China value the activity so much that they’re willing to risk breaking the law to get their hands on the future global reserve asset.

International competition for miners rises

Despite China’s black market surge, there is no doubt that the United States’ economy benefited from China’s ban. Just outside Kearney, Nebraska, a company called Compute North runs one of the United States’ largest data centers for cryptocurrency mining. Around the time of China’s ban, the company received a deluge of calls from operations that were trying to move their mining equipment from China into the United States.

Compute North welcomed its new partners with open arms. “We doubled in size,” said their lead technician. “We were busy nonstop for the whole summer. […] And there’s just continuing more and more demand all the time.”

Other towns, such as Rockdale, Texas, and Massena, New York, are also witnessing growth in their cryptocurrency mining ecosystems.

All of this migration could cause a vicious cycle for China and a virtuous cycle for the United States, which means that all sorts of other Bitcoin-related opportunities shift from China to the United States as well. Lamont Black, finance professor at DePaul University, believes that the recent influx of Bitcoin mining into America could bolster the country’s broader blockchain economy.

And that logic works both ways — to the extent that Bitcoin miners are leaving China, then ancillary Bitcoin activities will travel along with them.

Although fleeing miners considered countries other than the United States, it seems that miners prefer America because of its relatively robust respect for property rights. One miner migrating from China said, “Maybe the governments [of countries such as Russia or Kazakhstan] are not only shutting down the operation, but they also take […] all your machines. You might lose everything, so the United States is a safe choice.”

The takeaway for world governments

This black market phenomenon should be a lesson to Western politicians: If the Chinese government can’t ban Bitcoin mining out of existence, neither can you.

As the United States forges ahead in studying the regulatory implications of the industry, traditional financial institutions are closely monitoring its movements. Retail and institutional investors are also paying close attention to the market swings as they battle inflation at home. At this point, trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube is nothing but a waste of energy. Bitcoin mining is not going away.

The United States and other world leaders must learn from the mistakes of others so that they don’t have to repeat them. China wasted its efforts so that others don’t have to.

Disclaimer. Cointelegraph does not endorse any content of product on this page. While we aim at providing you all important information that we could obtain, readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company and carry full responsibility for their decisions, nor this article can be considered as an investment advice.

William Szamosszegi is the CEO and founder of Sazmining, the world’s first clean energy Bitcoin mining platform for retail customers. He is also the host of the Sazmining podcast and as a Bitcoin evangelist, Will is committed to improving humanity’s relationship with time, money and energy. Will is the recipient of Bucknell’s venture grant, a finalist in SXSW’s Digital Entrepreneurship Tournament, a Forbes Fellow and a regular speaker at Bitcoin mining conferences.

Kazakhstan to let crypto exchanges open bank accounts

Exchange platforms will get an opportunity to operate legally in the Astana International Finance Center in 2022.

In addition to its swift advances toward regulating crypto mining, Kazakhstan will launch a pilot project for crypto exchanges in the special economic zone of the Astana International Finance Centre. 

The Ministry of Digital Development, Innovations and Aerospace Industry of the Kazakhstan Republic announced on Thursday a pilot project of cooperation between the crypto exchanges and some of the local banks.

The working group formulated the guidelines for that cooperation, consisting of the representatives of the Ministry of Digital Development, the National Bank, the Financial Monitoring Agency, the Association of Financiers, Astana International Finance Centre and the finance and crypto market stakeholders. 

The pilot project will be functioning until the end of 2022 and include the exchanges that have gained a license from the freshly-formed Astana Financial Service Authority (AFSA). It will make a blueprint for the subsequent development of Kazakhstan as a regional crypto hub. Close guidelines should soon be published on the AIFC webpage.

Head of AFSA Nurhat Kushimov declared that the mission of his committee is to create an environment for reliable and sustainable companies to operate:

“The Astana Financial Service Authority is the only entity responsible for regulating the fintech companies’ activities in Kazakhstan. Before handing out the license to a fintech company, we conduct a deep and thorough background check, and after that maintain its constant supervision.”

Bagdat Musin, the Minister of Digital Development, voiced Kazakhstan’s aim to profit off crypto exchanges:

“It is necessary to create a complete ecosystem, so the digital assets, that have been mined using Kazakhstan’s electric energy, would be traded at the local exchanges to the maximum extent and the profit would stay in the country”.

On May 25, the Kazakh parliament passed in the first reading the amendments to the national tax code to impose a crypto mining tax tied to the prices of the electricity consumed by mining entities.

Related: Bitcoin miners’ resilience to geopolitics: A healthy sign for the network

On the same day, largest crypto exchange Binance signed a memorandum of understanding with the Ministry of Digital Development and revealed an intention to advise on developing the legislative framework and regulatory policy for crypto-assets in the republic.

Bitcoin miners’ exchange flow reaches 7-month high as BTC price tanks below $21K

Bitcoin mining profitability has dropped by over 75% from the market top and is currently at its lowest since October 2020.

Bitcoin’s (BTC) price tanked to a 52-week low of $20,800 earlier on Wednesday, down by over 70% from its all-time high of $68,788. Although the price has since recovered above $21,000, key market indicators point toward bears having a significant hold on the current market.

Bitcoin Miners to Exchange flow, a metric that indicates the volume of BTC sent by miners to crypto exchanges, rose to a seven-month high of 9,476. The rise in exchange flows indicates miners are currently selling their BTC in anticipation of the price going down.

The actions of the BTC miners often reflect the larger market sentiment as they mostly sell BTC to ensure they don’t incur losses on their mining rewards. The rise in Bitcoin miners selling activity is backed by the significant decline in mining profitability.

Related: Biggest Bitcoin exchange inflows since 2018 put potential $20K bottom at risk

Mining profitability has dropped over 75% from the top, and Bitcoin’s hash price currently sits at $0.0950/TH/day, which is the lowest point since October 2020.

Bitcoin Hashprice Index one-year chart. Source: Hashrate Index

The miner netflow to exchanges has also turned positive. When the miner netflow is positive, it signifies that more coins are being sent to exchanges than are being sent to personal wallets. Such behavior would indicate that miners are bearish on the price and are under pressure to sell.

Many BTC mining rigs have turned unprofitable with the price dropping below $21,000 and risk being shut down if the price doesn’t recover. The rest of the crypto market followed BTC in its price action as the overall market cap dipped below $1 trillion.

Over the course of the past decade, BTC has seen numerous bull cycles followed by an 80%-90% decline from the top. However, the BTC price has never fallen below the all-time high of the previous cycle. Currently, BTC is trading very close to its 2017 high of $19,783, and any possible sell-off from here could push it to 2017 territory.

Old Bitcoin mining rigs risk ‘shutdown’ after BTC price slips under $24K

New generation Bitcoin mining machines would remain profitable even if the BTC price crashes by another 50%.

Older Bitcoin (BTC) mining rigs are finding it difficult to generate positive revenues during the ongoing crypto market decline.

75% drop in Bitcoin mining profitability

The profitability of many Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) machines has dropped into the negative zone after Bitcoin’s fall below $24,000 this June 13, data fetched by F2Pool shows. Those machines include Antminer S11 and AvalonMiner 921, which are now close to their “shutdown price.”

Notably, Bitmain’s Antminer S11 offers a maximum hash rate of 20.5 Terra-hash per second (TH/s) for a power consumption of 1,530 watts.

The cost of running an Antiminer 211 is 0.13 kilowatts per hour (KW/h) based on the global average electricity cost. As a result, it would consume around $4.5 worth of power every day versus the roughly $2 income in the same period, according to data gathered by ASIC Miner Value.

The profitability of Antminer S11 as of June 13, 2022. Source: Bitmain

Similarly, the cost of running Canaan’s AvalonMiner 921 comes to be around $5 per day compared to its income of over $2 in the same period.

Overall, Bitcoin miners’ earnings have dropped from $0.412 per TH/s/day in October 2021 to $0.11 per TH/s/day in June 2022, according to the “Bitcoin Hashprice Index” — a 75% decline in eight months. 

Bitcoin Hashprice Index one-year chart. Source: Hashrate Index

The losses coincided with a sharp decline in the Bitcoin mining hash rate in the last seven days — from an all-time high of 239.15 exa-hash per second (EH/s) on June 6 to 189.72 EH/s on June 13, according to data from CoinWarz.

Bitcoin hashrate data in last 12 months. Source: CoinWarz

This suggests that miners are limiting their BTC production capacity by theoretically shutting down unprofitable mining rigs and may continue in the coming weeks if Bitcoin fails to recover above $25,000 and/or the mining difficulty adjusts

Bitcoin mining stocks suffer

On June 13, Bitcoin price hit its lowest levels since December 2020 following a brutal crypto market selloff.

BTC’s price reached as low as $23,707 (data from Coinbase) versus its November 2021’s peak of $69,000. The losses came due to the concerns about rising U.S. interest rates.

BTC/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

Bitcoin mining businesses, which remain at the forefront of minting and supplying new BTC tokens, have suffered the brunt of falling prices. For example, Canaan’s stock dropped by more than 90% after topping at $39.10 per share in March 2021.

Similarly, VanEck’s Digital Assets Mining ETF (DAM), which opened for business in early March 2022, had lost 63% of its value as of June 10, measured from its record high of $46.05. It looked poised to open June 13 lower, per Nasdaq’s pre-market data.

VanEck Digital Asset Mining ETF daily chart. Source: TradingView

New gen BTC mining rigs still in profit

On a brighter note, some mainstream mining machines still generate profits for miners, hinting their owners would be able to weather the bearish Bitcoin market.

Related: Crypto winter survival guide: Community shares game plan for the bear market

That includes the newly-launched iPollo’s V1, which returns a daily income of around $62 against its $9 power consumption in the same period, and machines from the Antminer’s S-series, which generate daily revenues of $4.75–$18, despite Bitcoin’s below-$25,000 prices.

Nonetheless, some profitable machines are near their shutdown thresholds, including Antminer’s S17+ (73T). It could become unprofitable when BTC’s price drop to $22,000, according to data provided by Bitdeer.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Here’s how blockchains are helping to advance the global energy grid

Governments and environmentalists are quick to criticize the amount of electricity Bitcoin mining uses, but investors’ growing interest in crypto is leading to positive steps in the energy sector.

The blockchain industry’s impact on the energy sector has been a major source of controversy over the past five years. Governments and environmental protection advocates have routinely expressed concerns about the amount of energy required to keep the Bitcoin network secure. Data shows the network’s energy consumption now rivals the yearly energy consumed by some small countries.

Historical Bitcoin network power demand. Source: CCAF

While much of the debate has centered around the negative environmental impacts of Bitcoin (BTC) mining, the drive to maximize earnings from mining and integrate blockchain technology with the energy grid has also introduced new developments that have the potential to be beneficial in the long term.

Here’s a look at several developments that have arisen out of the demand for energy to operate blockchain networks and the positive effects cryptocurrency mining is having on the energy industry.

Recapturing wasted energy

One of the fastest-growing segments of the cryptocurrency mining industry is the monetization of historically wasted sources of energy such as natural gas that is flared at oil drilling facilities.

Discovering natural gas pockets is a common part of the oil drilling industry, and up until recently, this gas was typically burned in a process called “flaring” because the infrastructure needed for its collection was non-existent or there had not been sufficient demand for LNG.

As the value of Bitcoin rose over time, the search for inexpensive energy sources led to the installation of shipping containers filled with mining equipment at drilling sites that can utilize the energy generated from flaring to mine BTC.

While the process still results in carbon dioxide emissions, income is generated during the process and these funds could be redirected toward mitigating environmental concerns.

Most recently, several companies have been exploring the integration of mining via flared gas in the Middle East, which accounted for over 38% of the global flaring in 2020 and presented one of the biggest opportunities to turn wasted energy into value.

Blockchain technology can make energy generation more efficient

A second side-benefit of the push to maximize crypto mining profits is improvements to the energy infrastructure and an increased focus on developing sustainable forms of energy generation.

Studies by the Bitcoin Mining Council have shown that there has been a noticeable increase in the amount of energy derived from sustainable sources, as opposed to sources like oil and coal.

Less developed countries like Kenya and El Salvador have also been able to benefit from improvements in energy generation from sustainable sources like geothermal power plants, which have given their economies an additional source of income.

Whether it’s the utilization of excess power generated by hydroelectric power plants or an increase in the use of wind and solar power, crypto mining is providing a financial incentive to help further optimization of energy efficiency and generation.

Related: Marathon Digital moves Montana BTC mine to pursue carbon neutrality

Smart grid technology

Another energy-related blockchain development is the formation of blockchain-based smart grids that aim to improve energy distribution on a large scale.

Inefficiencies in electricity distribution have largely been traced to the retail level, where smaller firms who own very little of the electrical grid infrastructure mainly provide simple services such as billing and monitoring meter usage.

These types of services can easily be handled by blockchain technology and Internet-of-Things- (IoT)-devices that help consumers bypass retailers and connect directly with wholesale distributors, potentially reducing electricity bills by up to 40%.

Connecting consumers with a smart grid also allows them to shop around with different providers to obtain the best rates possible. This could help to level the playing field in an industry that has historically been dominated by one local energy company.

Projects like Grid+ and Energy Web Token are helping to lead the way in this field as the old grid design of physical substations and monitoring equipment is replaced with a network of distributed energy resources (DERs) that include battery energy storage systems, solar arrays and natural gas generators.

While the sector is still in a nascent phase, it’s a trend worth keeping an eye on because, in the coming years, blockchain technology is bound to be further integrated into the energy sector.

Want more information about trading and investing in crypto markets?

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Swedish central bankers snipe Bitcoin mining, cite rampant energy use

A report by the Riksbank makes the case for banning Bitcoin mining in Sweden over proof-of-work energy consumption concerns; Bitcoin Twitter was quick to react.

Another day, another environmental attack on proof-of-work (PoW) mining. A report shared by the Swedish central bank argued that energy-intensive Bitcoin (BTC) and cryptocurrency mining should be banned. 

The Swedish central bank, known as the Riksbank, is the oldest central bank in the world. In a damning report entitled, “Cryptocurrencies and their impact on financial stability,” the bank had a crack at PoW cryptocurrency mining. PoW mining employs energy-guzzling data centers that solve puzzles to secure blockchains. The report stated:

“Recently, some extraction of crypto assets has been established in northern Sweden, where it consumes as much electricity as 200,000 households do on an annual basis.”

For Knut Svanholm, a Bitcoin author who recently penned  “∞/21M,” told Cointelegraph, “A central bank has no business telling people what they can and cannot do with their electricity.”

“If they really cared about the environment, they’d shut their own operation down for good tomorrow morning.”

The paper cites peers at the environmental agency and the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, equivalent to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, in its examination of Bitcoin’s energy use: 

“The proof-of-work method, which is used to confirm transactions and extract new cryptocurrencies, should be banned in favor of other, less energy-intensive methods.”

Svanholm has a different take: “Bitcoin mining is guessing a number over and over again. […] As so many other Swedish institutions have done before them, they [the central bank] choose to comment on something that they don’t understand and have no business having even an opinion on.”

The report comes as little surprise, given that banks and governments regularly take aim at PoW energy use. The report also flies in the face of Bitcoin adoption in Sweden. Home to a number of Bitcoin startups, Sweden is advanced in terms of European Bitcoin adoption.

Prominent Swedish Bitcoiners, including Svanholm as well as Christian Ander, the founder of Swedish Bitcoin exchange BTX, were quick to refute the report on Twitter. Svanholm shared a Youtube video that argued that “none of the energy used for Bitcoin mining goes to waste.”

Ander called the report “highly inappropriate.” He tweeted:

“Energy consumption must be neutral, production must be regulated. Do not regulate what individuals do with it.”

As the bank’s friends at the International Monetary Fund march onward with a central bank digital currency — as it would use less energy — the figures for Bitcoin mining are stark. In late 2021, Bitcoin took first place as the cleanest industry in the world with its high renewable energy mix. In neighboring Norway, Bitcoin miners use 100% renewable energy, while Bitcoin miners worldwide strive to make the world a better place.

Related: Bitcoin’s real energy use questioned as Ethereum founder criticizes BTC

The proposed ban from the Swedish central bankers also lands concurrently with the publication of a report examining the energy efficiency of crypto transactions . The report stated:

“When Bitcoin Lightning layer is compared to Instant Payment scheme, Bitcoin gains exponentially in scalability and efficiency, proving to be up to a million times more energy efficient per transaction than Instant Payments.”

Bitcoin’s Lightning Network recently hit the 4,000 BTC milestone showing its promise as a payment solution. Lightning payments take place off-chain and use considerably less electricity than the Bitcoin miners that secure the network’s layer 1. 

Nonetheless, research from Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance states that Bitcoin consumes an estimated 15GW of electricity each day. In meme-worthy material, back-of-the-napkin math from one Twitter user claims that clothes driers in the U.S. consume more energy: 

An Our World in Data report demonstrated that the global sports industry emits three times the emissions of the Bitcoin network. It begs the question, why do central banks continue to attack PoW’s energy usage? And which financial institution will fire the next shot? 

Bitcoin’s real energy use questioned as Ethereum founder criticizes BTC

A founding member of Ethereum has claimed that Bitcoin uses nearly 1% of the world’s electricity, but different sources put it substantially lower.

The ever-raging debate around Bitcoin’s energy consumption has been re-ignited, with founding member of Ethereum Anthony Donofrio claiming that Bitcoin is using “way too much” energy. 

According to figures from Digiconomist, Bitcoin (BTC) currently uses 0.82% of the world’s power while Ethereum (ETH) uses 0.34%. Ethereum researcher Justin Drake posted the figures to his 56,000 followers that Donofrio retweeted, stating:

Ethereum proponents are attempting to take shots at Bitcoin while simultaneously promoting Ethereum’s upcoming transition to proof-of-stake. Drake added another tweet moments later that read: “Ethereum post-merge: 0.000% of world.”

However, the validity of the figures are in doubt.

Even Drake was forced to acknowledge alternative sources of data in a later tweet, which estimated energy consumption figures at nearly 60% lower.

Data sourced from Digiconomist, which markets itself as a platform that “exposes the unintended consequences of digital trends,” has drawn criticism from blockchain industry professionals in the past. The most notable of these is fellow Ethereum developer Josh Stark, who called out the publication for frequently presenting the worst-case scenario when it comes to blockchain technology.

In November last year, Stark published a Twitter thread that questioned the accuracy of Digiconimist’s research methodology. Stark pointed out that almost all of the figures concerning blockchain power consumption were at the “very high end” of any theoretical outcome, especially when compared to more rigorous sources like the University of Cambridge.

Where Digiconomist claims that Bitcoin currently consumes 204 terawatt hours (TWh) worth of electricity per year, the University of Cambridge’s Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index estimates that Bitcoin’s real consumption is much closer to 125 TWh, a 39% difference.

Related: Are we misguided about Bitcoin mining’s environmental impacts? Slush Pool CMO Kristian Csepcsar explains.

While it may be a well-known fact that Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus mechanism is an energy-consuming process, the discussion around just how much power the Bitcoin network actually uses remains a hot-button issue.

According to a report from Cointelegraph, putting a specific number on Bitcoin’s actual power consumption can be quite difficult because of the variation in energy sources that power Bitcoin mining globally.

As of January this year, nearly 60% of global mining operations were reportedly powered by renewable energy sources, and Bitcoin mining operators are rushing to utilize “stranded” natural gas resources that would normally be burned off. Additionally, a report published by CoinShares in January this year found that Bitcoin mining may account for just 0.08% of the world’s total CO2 emissions in 2021.

Sam Tabar, chief security officer of Bit Digital, a publicly-traded Bitcoin mining company, told Cointelegraph that the environmental impact of Bitcoin is frequently exaggerated by critics:

“The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining is massively exaggerated by critics & traditional financial authorities (IMF, etc.) because they know they can divide a new counterculture movement by using fake environmental arguments. They are trying to gaslight us against each other. They gaslight the world with fake green arguments, and I understand why: They don’t want to lose influence over the levers of power of a system that only works for the elite.”

Kazakhstan’s central bank ‘isn’t going to ignore’ the crypto market

According to the chairman, the central bank will decide on implementing its digital currency by the end of 2022.

While Kazakhstan’s government is catching up with the tremendous volume of crypto mining in the country by introducing new taxes and regulations, the local central bank intends to explore the possibilities that crypto offers. 

During the press conference held on Tuesday, June 7, the chairman of the Kazakhstan National Bank Galymzhan, Pirmatov, stated that the nation aims to extract the profit from technologies the cryptocurrency market could provide. He emphasized the attractiveness of innovations and made reservations about the risks to macroeconomic stability. The official doesn’t think that the bank is late to the game:

“I don’t think that the National Bank is a latecomer. Like many other banks and financial regulators across the globe, we’re watching closely and researching the question.”

Pirmatov didn’t give away any details on the bank’s possible stance on crypto and warned that it is too early to speak about legalization, although consultations with market participants are planned:

“The approach is very simple: We aren’t going to ignore this market. We want to extract the maximum profit from the innovative potential these technologies give us.”

Related: Bitcoin miners’ resilience to geopolitics: A healthy sign for the network

The executive also revealed some news about the National Bank’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) project. According to him, the bank still intends to announce its methodology on a digital tenge by the end of June. The final decision on implementing the CBDC will reportedly be made in accordance with that methodology before the end of the year.

On May 25, the Kazakh parliament passed amendments to the national tax code in the first reading. The amendments would impose a crypto mining tax tied to the electricity prices consumed by mining entities. One of the largest mining markets in the world, Kazakhstan generated as little as $1.5 million of state earnings from mining in Q1 2022. According to the State Revenue Committee of the Ministry of Finance’s report, a significant amount of the expected fees has not been received as the government had shut down a wide number of crypto mining firms to “ensure energy security.”