Asset Management

Blockchain.com suspends its asset management subsidiary launched in April: Report

The timing of opening the subsidiary was unfortunate, a spokesperson told Bloomberg, although the company held up to the crypto winter for quite a while.

Cryptocurrency financial services company Blockchain.com will suspend operations of its asset management subsidiary, according to a Bloomberg report published March 9. The service had existed less than a year and appears to be the latest casualty of the crypto winter.

The subsidiary, known as Blockchain.com Asset Management, is based in London. It applied to be removed from the United Kingdom companies register on March 5. The application itself is dated Feb. 15. The company had not yet filed its first annual account.

Blockchain.com Asset Management was opened last April in partnership with Altis Partners, which was to manage its portfolios using Blockchain.com technology. It promised to offer “regulated crypto investment products for institutional investors, family offices and high net worth individuals.”

Blockchain.com, which was founded in 2011, opened the new subsidiary just after a funding round that raised its valuation from $5.2 billion to $14 billion. Standard Custody & Trust Company was named the custody partner for the new subsidiary also in April. A spokesperson told Bloomberg:

“Blockchain.com Asset Management launched in April 2022, shortly before macroeconomic conditions deteriorated rapidly. With crypto winter now approaching the one year mark, we made the business decision to pause operating this institutional product.”

Blockchain.com did not immediately respond to a Cointelegraph enquiry.

Related: Crypto firms cut nearly 3,000 jobs in January despite Bitcoin’s rise

Blockchain.com saw several landmarks during the crypto winter. It received registration in several countries in the course of 2022. It also entered into a custody agreement with Anchorage Bank along with other trading platforms in June, and partnered with Visa to issue a crypto card in the United States in October.

Nonetheless, according to Bloomberg, the company laid off 260 employees in 2023. In February, rumors emerged that it was in talks with other crypto firms about selling some of its assets or subsidiaries. A Blockchain.com spokesperson denied those rumors to Cointelegraph.

Coinbase cutting ties with Silvergate forces crypto hedge fund to find a new bank

A total of five crypto companies ended their partnership with Silvergate Bank on March 2 after a series of lawsuits and investigations against the bank.

Silvergate Bank — a prominent lender to crypto firms — lost five partners on March 2 due to a slew of investigations and lawsuits against it.

Coinbase, Paxos, Gemini, BitStamp and Galaxy Digital were some of the most notable crypto firms using Silvergate as their banking partner. However, the termination of service by Coinbase has also forced a crypto hedge fund to look for an alternate banking partner.

On March 3, a crypto hedge fund called Digital Asset Capital Management (DACM), with assets worth over $400 million, announced it was looking for a new banking partner in Switzerland post-Silvergate chaos. DACM used Silvergate’s real-time network to move funds to and from Coinbase Global’s platform.

In an interview with Bloomberg, DACM co-founder Richard Galvin said that although certain banks in the United States can handle crypto transactions, they are not as crypto-focused as Silvergate. He added that finding a new partner could take time, and they are “speaking to some Swiss banks.”

Switzerland was one of the first countries to regulate and offer banking licenses to crypto banks. SEBA Bank AG, for example, is a fully-regulated institution that secured a banking and securities dealer license from the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority in August 2019.

Silvergate was popular with crypto companies because of its instant and real-time bank transfer services. Thus, moving funds in the absence of such facilities might take longer. In the U.S., Signature Bank seems to be the next popular fintech bank of choice for crypto companies. Coinbase had already shifted its prime customer’s banking transfers to Signature Bank.

Related: Binance banking problems highlight a divide between crypto firms and banks

Signature Bank might be the next best choice for crypto firms, but the question is for how long? In December 2022, Signature Bank announced its intention to withdraw up to $10 billion in deposits from clients holding digital assets, starting a general exodus from the cryptocurrency sector. The bank had already severed ties with Binance, discontinuing its SWIFT banking services for the crypto exchange.

While crypto companies have always found it difficult to find a banking partner due to the absence of clear regulations around the market, the Silvergate saga has raised the difficulty level of transferring cash to crypto exchanges.

Crypto-asset manager Osprey Funds lays off most of its staff: Report

Institutional demand for Bitcoin and other crypto assets has waned due to the bear market.

Digital asset manager Osprey Funds has reportedly laid off most of its staff since the summer of 2022, underscoring the ongoing operational challenges posed by crypto’s enduring bear market. 

Yahoo Finance reported on Jan. 9 that Osprey Funds is currently operating with fewer than 10 employees after laying off 15 staff members since the summer. CEO Greg Kling told the publication that the layoffs were consistent with the market downturn and that Osprey was not at risk of closing operations.

Osprey offers accredited investors access to crypto-focused investment products, including an over-the-counter Bitcoin (BTC) trust that can be purchased inside brokerage accounts.

Institutional appetite for crypto products has waned significantly over the past year, reflecting subdued demand for riskier assets in the wake of tightening liquidity conditions worldwide. 2022 was the worst year in over a decade for global equities and bonds, so it wasn’t just crypto that was affected.

Cast your vote now!

Nevertheless, there are some positive signs that institutional investors are warming to crypto again. A Coinbase-sponsored survey between Sep. 21 and Oct. 27 found that 62% of institutional investors had increased their exposure to digital assets over the past 12 months.

Related: Huobi confirms 20% layoffs, denies insolvency rumors

Layoffs in the crypto industry have mounted since the summer, with leading exchanges announcing job cuts amid declining revenues. In November, Coinbase reportedly laid off more than 60 employees, mere months after slashing 18% of its workforce. Kraken also announced in November that it was laying off 30% of its global workforce.

How blockchain technology is used in supply chain management?

Blockchain benefits the supply chain industry by enhancing the traceability, transparency and tradability of goods and services that move along the value chain.

The future of blockchain-based supply chain?

The demand for the blockchain-based supply chain is driven by customers’ need to know the specific source of their items and whether they were made according to ethical standards.

Blockchain technology use cases in supply chain management have the potential to address concerns in traditional supply chains, like removing the need to prepare burdensome paperwork. Moreover, a decentralized, immutable record of all transactions and organizations’ digitization of physical assets can make it possible to track products from the manufacturing unit to the delivery destination, enabling a more transparent and visible supply chain.

However, the implementation of blockchain in the supply chain is yet to achieve mainstream adoption as high-level expertise is required to reap the benefits. Additionally, because blockchain technology is still in its infancy, it is governed by various laws in many nations, which would affect supply networks. Despite this, blockchain-based solutions will likely gradually replace conventional supply chain processes and networks; this transition won’t occur all at once.

How blockchain enhances tradability in the supply chain?

Tradability is one of the unique advantages of blockchain technology. Blockchain platforms ensure tradability via the tokenization of assets. Tokenization turns a tangible object, such as a product, into a digital asset, and the system keeps one token for each product, which can be exchanged in the market.

Blockchain platforms help tokenize an asset by dividing it into shares that digitally represent ownership. Users can transfer ownership of these tokens without actually exchanging physical assets because they are tradeable. Moreover, automated smart contract payments help license software, services and products accurately. 

In addition, the consensus is provided via blockchain, meaning that there is no disagreement over transactions in the chain by design. The chain’s unique ability to track ownership records for physical assets like real estate and digital assets is made possible because every entity uses the same ledger version.

You might wonder why companies prefer asset tokenization instead of directly paying in fiat. One possible reason is that smart contracts enable peer-to-peer payment that speeds up the transfer of funds, lowering the time it takes to reimburse businesses for goods or services supplied.

Additionally, token payment prevents fraudsters from taking advantage of chargeback situations to steal from businesses. Once a payment is made, it is sent to the business’s blockchain wallet account, and no unapproved withdrawals can be possible.

How blockchain enhances traceability in the supply chain?

To trace the activities along the supply chain more efficiently, concerned parties can access price, date, origin, quality, certification, destination and other pertinent information using blockchain.

Traceability, as used in the supply chain sector, is the capacity to pinpoint the previous and current locations of inventory and a record of product custody. It involves tracking products as they move through a convoluted process, from raw materials to merchants and customers, after passing through many geographic zones.

Traceability is one of the significant benefits of blockchain-driven supply chain innovations. As blockchain consists of decentralized open-source ledgers recording data, which is replicable among users, transactions happen in real-time.

As a result, the blockchain can build a supply chain that is smarter and more secure since it allows for the tracking of products through a robust audit trail with almost concurrent visibility.

By connecting supply chain networks through a decentralized system, blockchain has the potential to enable frictionless movement between suppliers and manufacturers.

Furthermore, producers and distributors can securely record information such as the nutritional value of items, product origin and quality and the presence of any allergens using a collaborative blockchain network. In addition, having access to a product’s history gives buyers more assurance that the items they buy are from moral producers, thus making supply chains sustainable.

On the contrary, if any health concern or non-compliance with the safety standards is discovered, necessary action can be taken against the manufacturer based on the traceability details stored on the distributed ledger.

How does blockchain technology improve supply chain management?

Unlike traditional supply chains, blockchain-based supply chains will automatically update the data transaction records when a change is made, enhancing traceability along the overall supply chain network.

Blockchain-based supply chain networks might need a closed, private and permissioned blockchain with limited actors, in contrast to Bitcoin and other financial blockchain applications, which may be public. However, the possibility of a more open set of partnerships may still exist.

In blockchain-based supply networks, four key actors play roles, including registrars, standard organizations, certifiers, and actors:

  • Registrars: They provide network actors with distinct identities. 
  • Standard organizations: These organizations develop blockchain rules and technical specifications or standards schemes, such as Fairtrade, for environmentally friendly supply chains. 
  • Certifiers: They certify individuals for involvement in supply chain networks. 
  • Actors: A registered auditor or certifier must certify participants or actors, such as producers, sellers and buyers, to retain the system’s credibility.

How a product is “owned” or transferred by a specific actor is an intriguing feature of structure and flow management and among the benefits of blockchain in supply chain management. But does blockchain make supply chain management more transparent?

As the concerned parties are required to fulfill a smart contract condition before a product is transferred (or sold) to another actor to validate the exchange of goods or services, and the blockchain ledger is updated with transaction information after all participants have complied with their duties and processes, overall transparency across the value chain is improved.

Additionally, the nature, quantity, quality, location and ownership product dimensions are transparently specified by blockchain technology. As a result, customers can view the continuous chain of custody and transactions from the raw materials to the final sale, eliminating the requirement for a reliable central organization to administer and maintain digital supply chains.

How is the modern supply chain evolving?

Contemporary technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), robotics and blockchain are being incorporated into the digital supply network, which combines data and information from various sources to distribute goods and services along the value chain.

Supply chain infrastructure develops from strictly physical, functional systems to a vast, linked network of assets, data and activities. For instance, by utilizing AI algorithms, businesses may extract insights from large data sets to proactively manage inventory, automate warehouse processes, optimize critical sourcing connections, enhance delivery times and develop novel customer experiences that raise customer satisfaction and increase sales.

In addition, AI-powered robots help automate various human-owned manual tasks, such as order picking and packing processes, delivering raw material and manufactured goods, moving items during storage and distribution and scanning and boxing items. According to Amazon, robots allow it to hold 40% more inventory, enabling it to fulfill Prime shipping commitments on time.

Furthermore, as blockchain is immutable in nature, it can be issued to track and trace the source of products and identify counterfeit items and fraud within the value chain. For instance, if a business is transporting perishables like cheese, which must maintain a specific temperature at all times.

The company transporting the cheese can determine whether the temperature has risen beyond the permitted threshold during the voyage or impacted the cargo, enabling them to minimize problems with food quality.

What is supply chain management and how does it work?

Supply chain management actively streamlines a company’s supply-side operations from planning to after-sales services to enhance customer satisfaction.

Supply chain management (SCM) refers to controlling the entire production flow, from acquiring raw materials to delivering the final product/service at the destination. In addition, it handles the movement of materials, information and finances associated with a good or service.

Even though the supply chain and logistics are sometimes confused, logistics is actually only one part of the supply chain. Traditional supply chain management systems involve steps like planning, sourcing, manufacturing, delivering and after-sales service to control the supply chain centrally. 

That said, the process begins with deciding how to meet customers’ needs and selecting suppliers to source the raw material to manufacture the product. The next step is to determine if the manufacturer will outsource or take care of delivery. And after a product is delivered, it is a network that will offer after-sales services, such as handling product returns and repairs, among others, which is crucial for customer satisfaction.

On the contrary, modern SCM systems are managed using software from the creation of goods and services, warehousing, inventory management, order fulfillment, information tracking and product/service delivery to after-sales services. For instance, numerous robotic and automated technologies are used by Amazon to stack and store goods, as well as to pick and pack orders. The company has also begun utilizing electric drones to transport packages weighing less than five pounds in selected United States regions.

Paradigm co-founder feels ‘deep regret’ investing in SBF and FTX

Some challenged whether the multi-billion dollar venture capital firm did enough due diligence on FTX prior to investment.

The co-founder of asset management firm Paradigm says they feel “deep regret” for having invested in FTX amid recent revelations involving FTX, Alameda Research, and Sam Bankman-Fried. 

In a Twitter post on Nov. 15, Matt Huang, co-founder and managing partner of Paradigm said the firm is “shocked” by the revelations surrounding the two companies and their founder, adding:

“We feel deep regret for having invested in a founder and company who ultimately did not align with crypto’s values and who have done enormous damage to the ecosystem.”

Matt Huang, Managing Partner and Co-Founder of Paradigm Source: Paradigm

Paradigm is a crypto and Web3-focused venture capital firm based in San Francisco. In April reports suggested the firm’s assets under management totaled approximately $13.2 billion

In Nov. 2021, the firm announced a $2.5 billion New Venture Fund, which dethroned Andreesen Horowitz’s (a16z) as the largest venture fund in crypto.

The firm’s website currently lists FTX and FTX.US in its portfolio. Reports suggest its investment in the exchange is around the $278 million mark.

Huang said that Paradigm’s equity investment in FTX only constituted “a small part of our total assets,” adding that it has now written its FTX investment down to $0.

He also assured that the firm has never traded on FTX or has ever invested in tokens linked to the exchange, including FTX Token (FTT), Serum token (SRM), Maps.ME Token (MAPS), or the Oxygen Protocol token (OXY).

“We never traded on FTX and did not have any assets on the exchange. We have never been investors in related tokens such as FTT, SRM, MAPS, or OXY.”

Related: FTX bankruptcy freezes millions worth of crypto company funds

Since posting the tweet, a number of Twitter users challenged whether the firm did enough due diligence prior to investing in FTX.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, CK Zheng, co-founder of digital assets hedge fund ZX Squared Capital reflected that in hindsight, many venture capital firms may not have done the proper due diligence on FTX and its executive team, commenting:

“They don’t have a very good governance process, don’t have a board. It’s basically a one-man show.”

“I’m sure when a young company starts to build the company with sophisticated technology […] I can see how things can go bad quickly if they don’t have a good understanding of the technology married with finance.”

“Obviously, they’re smart in one aspect, but they’re running a $32 billion company is very different than, you know, when you manage a small company,” he added.

Investors to have recently marked down their FTX investments include Sequoia Capital, which wrote off its roughly $210 million investment on Nov. 10, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, which invested $95 million in the crypto exchange, and SoftBank Group Corp., which is expected to write down a nearly $100 million investment.

Paradigm co-founder feels ‘deep regret’ investing in SBF and FTX

Some challenged whether the multi-billion dollar venture capital firm did enough due diligence on FTX prior to investment.

The co-founder of asset management firm Paradigm says they feel “deep regret” for having invested in FTX amid recent revelations involving FTX, Alameda Research and Sam Bankman-Fried. 

In a Twitter post on Nov. 15, Matt Huang, co-founder and managing partner of Paradigm, said the firm is “shocked” by the revelations surrounding the two companies and their founder, adding:

“We feel deep regret for having invested in a founder and company who ultimately did not align with crypto’s values and who have done enormous damage to the ecosystem.”

Matt Huang, Managing Partner and Co-Founder, Paradigm. Source: Paradigm

Paradigm is a crypto and Web3-focused venture capital firm based in San Francisco. In April reports suggested the firm’s assets under management totaled approximately $13.2 billion

In Nov. 2021, the firm announced a $2.5 billion New Venture Fund, which dethroned Andreesen Horowitz’s (a16z) as the largest venture fund in crypto.

The firm’s website currently lists FTX and FTX.US in its portfolio. Reports suggest its investment in the exchange is around the $278 million mark.

Huang said that Paradigm’s equity investment in FTX only constituted “a small part of our total assets,” adding that it has now written its FTX investment down to $0.

He also assured that the firm has never traded on FTX or has ever invested in tokens linked to the exchange, including FTX Token (FTT), Serum token (SRM), Maps.ME Token (MAPS) or the Oxygen Protocol token (OXY).

“We never traded on FTX and did not have any assets on the exchange. We have never been investors in related tokens such as FTT, SRM, MAPS, or OXY.”

Related: FTX bankruptcy freezes millions worth of crypto company funds

Since posting the tweet, a number of Twitter users challenged whether the firm did enough due diligence prior to investing in FTX.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, CK Zheng, co-founder of digital assets hedge fund ZX Squared Capital, reflected that in hindsight, many venture capital firms may not have done the proper due diligence on FTX and its executive team, commenting:

“They don’t have a very good governance process, don’t have a board. It’s basically a one-man show.”

“I’m sure when a young company starts to build the company with sophisticated technology […] I can see how things can go bad quickly if they don’t have a good understanding of the technology married with finance.”

“Obviously, they’re smart in one aspect, but they’re running a $32 billion company is very different than, you know, when you manage a small company,” he added.

Investors to have recently marked down their FTX investments include Sequoia Capital, which wrote off its roughly $210 million investment on Nov. 10, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, which invested $95 million in the crypto exchange, and SoftBank Group Corp., which is expected to write down a nearly $100 million investment.