Fiat Money

ECB assesses environmental footprint of cash, sees room for improvement

In Europe, the environmental footprint of banknotes is minuscule compared to crypto’s, but crypto has its own advantages.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has taken a look at the environmental impact of using banknotes and discovered 16 environmental impact categories. As with cryptocurrency, energy efficiency was a major issue.

Banknotes continue to be the most common form of payment at points of sale in the eurozone. The use of cash requires an elaborate physical infrastructure for production, distribution, and eventual retirement.

Energy use by ATMs was the biggest contributor to banknotes’ environmental footprint at 37%, followed by transportation (35%). The remainder was processing, paper manufacturing, authentication and many other steps. The ECB began efforts to reduce the environmental impact of banknotes in 2004. According to the ECB report:

Read more

Fight between crypto and governments “just getting started”, says ShapeShift CEO

The crypto industry needs to prepare for increasing government pressure as it ramps up its challenge to the State monopoly over money, says ShapeShift CEO Erik Voorhees.

Despite the unprecedented regulatory pressure that crypto has been facing recently in the United States, the fight between the American government and the crypto industry has just started, believes ShapeShift CEO Erik Voorhees. 

According to the entrepreneur, U.S. authorities still don’t see crypto as an existential threat to the fiat system, and their recent crackdown is just an opportunistic reaction to last year’s blowups of fraudulent crypto companies. 

“They see it as sort of this scammy area where they can come in and look like the hero for cleaning up a mess,” Voorhees said in an exclusive interview with Cointelegraph.

According to Voorhees, crypto needs to become mainstream before governments move against it fully. At that point, “it will be too late” for government actors to crack down on crypto since too many people will be aware of its value and utility.

Voorhees has no doubt that crypto will ultimately win the battle for the hearts and minds of people in part because it is free from the restrictions on capital flow that are present in traditional finance systems.

“Capital goes where friction is least […]. In the crypto world, capital moves freely, it moves effortlessly,” he pointed out.

Watch the full interview on our YouTube channel and don’t forget to subscribe!

Fight between crypto and governments “just getting started,” says ShapeShift CEO

The crypto industry needs to prepare for increasing government pressure as it ramps up its challenge to state monopoly over money, says ShapeShift CEO Erik Voorhees.

Despite the unprecedented regulatory pressure that crypto has been facing recently in the United States, the fight between the American government and the crypto industry has just started, believes ShapeShift CEO Erik Voorhees.

According to the entrepreneur, U.S. authorities still don’t see crypto as an existential threat to the fiat system, with their recent crackdown an opportunistic reaction to last year’s blowups of fraudulent crypto companies.

“They see it as sort of this scammy area where they can come in and look like the hero for cleaning up a mess,” Voorhees said in an exclusive interview with Cointelegraph.

According to Voorhees, crypto must become mainstream before governments move against it fully. At that point, “it will be too late” for government actors to crack down on crypto since too many people will be aware of its value and utility.

Voorhees does not doubt that crypto will ultimately win the battle for the hearts and minds of people, partly because it is free from the restrictions on capital flows in traditional finance systems.

“Capital goes where friction is least […]. In the crypto world, capital moves freely; it moves effortlessly,” he pointed out.

Watch the full interview on our YouTube channel and don’t forget to subscribe!

How to buy or sell Bitcoin without using a centralized crypto exchange?

With the fall of P2P exchanges like Paxful and LocalBitcoins, the question of how to buy or sell crypto without using CEXs is a pertinent one.

The failure of FTX triggered a notable growth of self-custody in 2022, with numerous cryptocurrency investors transitioning from centralized exchanges (CEX) to hardware or software wallets.

The rising popularity of self-custody could even potentially erase the need for centralized exchanges one day, according to Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao. But how would people buy or sell cryptocurrencies without centralized exchanges?

The crypto industry already offers ways to exchange cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) for fiat money without using a CEX like Binance. However, such a process is associated with certain pros and cons and may require additional research.

This article will discuss the most straightforward exchange methods to shed some light on buying or selling crypto without using a centralized crypto trading platform.

Bitcoin ATMs

Bitcoin-enabled automated teller machines (ATMs) are probably one of the easiest ways to exchange fiat money for crypto and vice versa. Like conventional ATMs, Bitcoin ATMs allow users to deposit and withdraw money using cash or a debit card. But instead of a bank account, a Bitcoin ATM requires users to have a BTC wallet address to deposit or withdraw money.

Like a traditional ATM, a Bitcoin ATM has a monitor, a QR scanner, a bill acceptor and a dispenser. To connect their Bitcoin wallet to a crypto ATM, users are usually prompted to scan a QR code corresponding to their BTC wallet address.

While providing a simple way to exchange money against cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin ATMs suffer from limited global adoption.

According to data from CoinATMRadar, there are roughly 34,000 Bitcoin ATMs in 80 countries worldwide, with almost 85% of all crypto ATMs in the United States. About 4% of Bitcoin ATMs are located across Europe, with most of those located in Spain, Poland, Romania, Switzerland and Austria.

The infrastructure of global cryptocurrency ATMs has also seen a significant decline recently. According to data from CoinATMRadar, 412 crypto ATMs were removed from the grid worldwide in the first two months of 2023, compared with 1,000 monthly crypto ATM installations between December 2020 and January 2022.

Given the limited reach of crypto ATMs, one shouldn’t rely entirely on their capability to exchange fiat for crypto. According to some industry executives, crypto ATMs have also been increasingly scrutinized by regulators recently, which could bring even more issues to the exchange method.

“For a long time, ATMs provided an excellent service to anyone looking to buy and sell Bitcoin privately,” Trezor’s Bitcoin analyst Josef Tetek told Cointelegraph. “Current global trends suggest that this era is coming to its end, as ATM providers are becoming regulated just like any other financial institution,” he noted, suggesting that Bitcoin ATMs are likely to become significantly less private in the near future.

Another weak spot of Bitcoin ATMs is high transaction costs, with fees often ranging from 5–20%.

Peer-to-peer Bitcoin exchange platforms

Peer-to-peer (P2P) Bitcoin exchange marketplaces are among the most common crypto exchange options alongside Bitcoin ATMs. Such platforms allow users to trade digital currency directly with each other without the need for a centralized third party to facilitate the transactions.

Unlike CEXs, P2P exchanges don’t rely on automated engines to complete transactions, allowing users to manually choose their preferred offer, trade directly with a counterparty, and transact funds using a self-custodial wallet. Such platforms are less vulnerable than CEXs due to their independence from intermediaries controlling funds during a trade.

Many industry executives believe that P2P crypto marketplaces are likely to be the future of crypto due to their unique features. “P2P exchanges are far more resilient to regulatory crackdowns than centralized exchanges,” Jan3 CEO Samson Mow told Cointelegraph, adding that it would be good to have more P2P options.

“P2P services are the future of Bitcoin adoption, but only if they can successfully avoid intruding on users’ privacy,” Trezor’s Tetek said. He specified that some regulatory restrictions, like Know Your Customer (KYC), could essentially make P2P crypto services useless, stating:

“Having a P2P service with KYC is merely a variation of using a CEX but with worse liquidity.”

While providing a more resilient option on the regulatory side, P2P services are often associated with security issues, according to Quantum Economics founder and CEO Mati Greenspan. P2P exchanges like Binance P2P or now-terminated Paxful and LocalBitcoins are “certainly a step in the right direction,” he said, adding:

“This sort of online marketplace maintains the decentralized ethos of crypto, but it is also susceptible to attacks from both regulators and hackers.”

Crypto on-ramp/off-ramp integrations on software or hardware wallets

Another common way to buy or sell crypto without a CEX is using an on-ramp or an off-ramp solution provided within a self-custodial wallet through a third-party payment provider.

Software wallets like Exodus and hardware ones — like Ledger and Trezor — offer several methods to deposit or withdraw Bitcoin using default software through various payment integrations. Such wallets often allow users to buy crypto or cash out their coins using bank transfers, debit or credit card payments, Apple Pay and other options, depending on the country of the user’s bank location.

Providing a simple alternative to Bitcoin ATM or P2P services, wallet exchange integrations are currently accompanied by issues like limited coverage due to the low adoption of crypto payment partnerships worldwide. Due to this issue, residents of many countries may find it impossible to exchange their crypto against fiat because their banks aren’t supported on the payment provider’s network.

However, one may also find that wallet exchange integrations are a bit costly in terms of fees. For example, some third-party application programming interface (API) providers on Exodus Wallet charge up to 12% in automated clearing house transfer fees.

Software and hardware wallets are usually integrated with more than just a single off-ramp or on-ramp provider, offering a significant variety of choices. Some providers include PayPal, MoonPay, Transak, Sardine, Banxa, Coinbase Pay, Onramp.money and Mercuryo — among others.

Offline P2P exchange

One doesn’t necessarily need to use online exchange services to buy or sell Bitcoin. There is an opportunity to do that in person or by interacting with investors who want to cash out or acquire some cryptocurrency on social media apps.

“Various alternatives do exist for offline transactions where the buyer meets the seller in person. Depending where you live, this might happen at a regular currency exchange shop or through a known black market dealer,” Greenspan told Cointelegraph. He referred to groups on messengers like Telegram or WhatsApp, where buyers and sellers are constantly making connections. “I’ve even heard of people using sites like Craigslist,” the exec added.

Offline P2P exchange of Bitcoin is the “best choice for privacy-minded individuals,” Trezor’s BTC analyst Tetek believes. He stressed that exchanging Bitcoin in person is essentially returning to the roots of BTC exchange. “Bitcoin meetups are usually the best place to find fellow Bitcoiners looking for an exchange,” he said.

As everything has pros and cons, offline P2P exchange isn’t unique, and some massive concerns are associated with such a Bitcoin exchange method.

The biggest risks of offline P2P exchange are related to safety and limited scalability, Quantum Economics’ Greenspan said, adding:

“There are loads of disadvantages from safety concerns to the uncomfortable feeling of dealing with a complete stranger, but mostly it’s just not a very scalable solution.”

Such a crypto exchange method also requires users to be much more knowledgeable and savvy than just purchasing online at a well-known crypto exchange.

Can you buy Bitcoin on a DEX?

While considering options for buying or selling Bitcoin without interacting with a CEX, one may consider using a decentralized exchange (DEX) as an alternative. But should a DEX count as a standalone option to a CEX in this regard?

Despite offering the opportunity to buy or sell Bitcoin, DEXs usually require users to have some exposure to crypto before the transaction. That means that Bitcoin can only be purchased or withdrawn with the help of other cryptocurrencies on a DEX.

Additionally, some issues currently prevent DEXs from serving as a solid alternative to CEXs in terms of buying or selling crypto, according to Trezor’s Tetek. “Some of the major challenges include unfriendly user experience, high spreads resulting from low liquidity, and concerns about receiving ‘dirty’ Bitcoin or fiat,” he said. The analyst added that these issues must be addressed for further adoption of DEXs.

It also depends on what one refers to as a DEX, Jan3’s Mow added. “If you’re referring to an Ethereum-based DEX, it’s not an alternative at all because, at the base layer, Ethereum isn’t decentralized,” the executive argued, adding that a real DEX won’t have any centralized part that can be shut down.

Is there a future without centralized crypto exchanges?

Despite the industry offering many decentralized options to exchange Bitcoin against fiat, CEXs remain a significant player.

Apart from offering a straightforward entry into the crypto market and Web3, CEXs are also an important industry component in terms of price discovery, according to Bitcoin proponent Mow. He stated:

“Centralized cryptocurrency exchanges will always continue to exist, and they are an important venue for price discovery and liquidity. Only regions that endorse a heavy-handed approach will force exchanges out, but that’s really to the detriment of their people.”

It’s yet to be known whether CEXs will continue to be a key part of the crypto industry in the coming years. Some experts are confident that the industry will get rid of centralized exchanges one day.

“For now, centralized exchanges remain a necessary scourge on the industry, and I do look forward to the day we can do without them entirely,” Quantum Economics CEO Greenspan said.

“Centralized exchanges pose a risk not only to the privacy and security of Bitcoin users but also undermine the very reason Bitcoin came into existence — creating a parallel financial system and supporting the financial autonomy of its holders,” Trezor’s Tetek stated. He added that CEXs undeniably served as an accelerator for Bitcoin adoption in the past, but they are slowly becoming its “biggest enemy.” The BTC analyst added:

“I can definitely imagine a world without any CEXs. When Bitcoin becomes a global monetary standard, there will be no need to exchange Bitcoin for fiat.”

MetaMask launches new fiat purchase function for cryptocurrency

The new feature will allow users to purchase cryptocurrencies using various payment methods, such as debit or credit cards, PayPal, bank transfers and instant ACH.

Cryptocurrency wallet and decentralized application (DApp) provider MetaMask has announced the launch of a new feature that will allow users to purchase crypto with fiat currency directly from its Portfolio Dapp. The move is intended to provide users with an easier way to purchase crypto with fiat currency.

The new “Buy Crypto” feature enables MetaMask users to purchase a wide range of cryptocurrencies using various payment methods, including debit or credit cards, PayPal, bank transfers, and instant ACH (Automated Clearing House). The service will be rolled out to users in over 189 countries and will offer more than 90 tokens across eight different networks, including Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, BNB Smart Chain, Avalanche Contract Chain, Fantom, Optimis and Celo.

To access the feature, MetaMask users can connect their wallets to the Portfolio Dapp or click on the “Buy” button in the MetaMask extension wallet. From there, users can select their region, payment method, and the token and network they want to purchase on.

The feature also takes into account a variety of factors, such as the user’s location and local regulations, to provide a customized quote for each purchase. Once the user has selected a quote, they will be redirected to a third-party provider’s website to complete the transaction. The funds will then be deposited directly into the user’s MetaMask wallet.

Related: Scam alert: MetaMask warns users of deceptive March 31 airdrop rumors

Over the years, MetaMask has partnered with several organizations to help onboard new users to its platform.

In 2022, Metamask partnered with PayPal to allow MetaMask users to purchase and transfer Ether (ETH) via PayPal’s platform. The service, announced on Dec 14, enables users to purchase and transfer ETH from PayPal to MetaMask by logging onto their Mobile MetaMask app, which would then redirect them to their PayPal account to complete transactions.

Additionally, on March 21 MetaMask announced a new integration with crypto fintech provider MoonPay that allows Nigerian users to purchase crypto through instant bank transfers. The new feature, available in the MetaMask mobile and Portfolio DApp, offers a simpler and cheaper way to buy crypto without using credit or debit cards. 

BUSD deposits and withdrawals via OCBS suspended on Binance.US

Binance.US said it temporarily disabled the One Common Billing System and BUSD stablecoin pairs after halting Apple Pay and Google Pay deposits.

Amid the ongoing uncertainty around the global banking turmoil, Binance’s United States-based arm Binance.US is halting some services.

According to the Binance.US status dashboard, on March 31, the U.S. crypto exchange disabled Binance USD (BUSD) stablecoin pairs via the One Common Billing System, referred to as OCBS.

The affected services include BUSD crypto deposits and withdrawals or buying, selling and converting crypto options, the status notice says.

Binance.US said that the firm is currently investigating the issue, noting that the services are “suspended temporarily.”

Binance.US status dashboard. Source: Binance.US 

The OCBS and BUSD issues on Binance.US came shortly after the firm halted certain U.S. dollar deposit services on March 30. According to the dashboard, Binance.US temporarily suspended Apple Pay and Google Pay deposits due to the company “transitioning to new banking and payment service providers over the next several weeks.”

For up to 5% of Binance.US customers, the platform has also halted debit card deposits starting from March 30, 2023. “We are working to restore all services as soon as possible,” Binance.US stated.

Related: Kraken to suspend Plaid withdrawals and deposits via ACH Silvergate

The news comes amid Binance.US’ global affiliate, Binance, facing legal action from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). On March 27, the CFTC filed a suit against Binance and its CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao for alleged trading violations, arguing that the exchange failed to meet compliance obligations by not registering with the regulator.

Launched in September 2019 and headquartered in California, Binance.US operates as a separate entity from Binance, which is unavailable to U.S. users due to local regulations.

Catherine Coley, the first CEO of Binance.US, reportedly enlisted a former federal prosecutor and top cop at the CFTC to represent her in the U.S. government’s investigations into Binance.US. After leaving Binance.US in June 2021, Coley has remained silent about her whereabouts in media, and hasn’t posted anything on her Twitter.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

How does the monetary supply affect cryptocurrencies?

Cointelegraph analyst and writer Marcel Pechman explains how the monetary supply affects cryptocurrencies.

The show Macro Markets, hosted by Marcel Pechman, which airs every Friday at 12 pm ET on the Cointelegraph Markets & Research YouTube channel, explains complex concepts in layman’s terms and focuses on the cause and effect of traditional financial events on day-to-day crypto activity.

In today’s episode, crypto analyst Pechman discusses the fundamentals of money, including how to calculate supply, the effects of savings deposits and money market funds, and how central banks can inflate without effectively “printing money.”

Pechman explains why near-zero interest rates and reduced financial institution reserve requirements benefit risk assets, such as cryptocurrencies, so much. The video then compares the broad monetary supply change in the United States to Bitcoin’s (BTC) price — some impressive charts you should not miss.

Following a brief recap, Pechman explains why governments are doomed to continue inflating the monetary supply and why it is impossible to predict how long it will take to affect stock markets and crypto.

The Macro Markets’ next segment focuses on the housing market, a staggering $260-trillion asset class that has historically been able to keep up with monetary debasement. Pechma reveals the ambiguity surrounding the potential for delinquency, the rise in mortgage rates, and the connection to the housing crisis of 2008.

Two hypotheses are presented to illustrate how realistic it is for a portion of the trillion-dollar housing market to flow to cryptocurrencies and why stocks and gold are unlikely to be able to absorb all of the value coming their way. This concludes the segment.

If you are looking for exclusive and valuable content provided by leading crypto analysts and experts, make sure to subscribe to the Cointelegraph Markets & Research YouTube channel. Join us at Macro Markets every Friday at 12:00 pm ET.

Gemini says no funds at Signature Bank backing GUSD

The company stated that it previously had a relationship with Signature but said it no longer has funds there.

Crypto exchange Gemini had no funds at Signature Bank, and its Gemini US Dollar (GUSD) stablecoin was not backed by any deposits at the failed bank, according to a March 13 official tweet from the company.

The exchange further clarified that it had partnered with Signature in the past, stating, “They [Signature] have been incredible partners to Gemini and our industry for the better part of a decade.” However, all current reserves are held at only three United Stat banks — State Street Bank, Goldman Sachs and Fidelity — Gemini said.

The company also stated that it is actively monitoring bank counterparty risk to ensure that customer funds and GUSD backing are not impacted.

On March 13, Circle’s USD Coin (USDC) lost its peg in the secondary market due to fallout from the Silicon Valley Bank collapse, leading to speculation that GUSD and other stablecoins may also lose their pegs. USDC regained its peg on March 13.

Gemini emphasized that each GUSD coin is backed by dollar reserves, stating:

“As a reminder, Gemini is a full-reserve exchange and custodian. This means that all customer funds and Gemini dollar reserves are held 1:1 on Gemini and are available for withdrawal at any time.”

The collapse of Signature was part of a series of bank failures that swept the U.S. in early March. Silvergate Bank agreed to “voluntarily liquidate” on March 8, followed by Silicon Valley Bank being shut down on March 10.

Do Kwon had the right idea, banks are risk to fiat-backed stablecoins — CZ

Given Silicon Valley Bank’s direct involvement in destabilizing USDC prices, CZ blamed banks for increasing the risks of stablecoins.

The death spiral of the Terra ecosystem served as a catalyst to the 2022 bear market — causing losses in the billions, damaging investor sentiment and intensifying the regulatory spotlight over cryptocurrencies. However, the recent depegging of Circle’s USD Coin (USDC) led Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao to believe that traditional banks are a risk to stablecoins that are usually pegged 1:1 with fiat currencies, like the U.S. dollar.

On March 11, Circle disclosed that Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) did not process its $3.3 billion withdrawal request. The crypto market responded to the revelation by selling off USDC holdings, causing the U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin to lose its peg. Given SVB’s direct involvement in destabilizing USDC prices, CZ blamed banks for increasing the risks to stablecoins.

Supporting CZ’s sentiment, a community member pitched the idea of a crypto-backed stablecoin. CZ responded by highlighting the defunct algorithmic stablecoin launched by Do Kwon, saying:

“Do Kwon actually had the right idea, but just failed miserably on execution.”

Moreover, according to CZ, fiat currencies are a risk without adding crypto to the equation.

While numerous jurisdictions have sought legal actions against Kwon, the entrepreneur continues to reside in a safe haven unknown to the authorities.

Related: Circle’s USDC instability causes domino effect on DAI, USDD stablecoins

Many investors foresaw the possibility of USDC depegging and decided to sell their holdings to avoid losses. However, for one such investor, a hasty decision led to a loss of over $2 million for one such investor.

Instead of selling their USDC holdings in a liquidity pool for 6% slippage, the investor chose a “questionable” method resulting in a maximal extractable value (MEV) bot netting $2.045 million in profit after paying $45 in gas and $39,000 in MEV bribes.

Banks with crypto services require new Anti-Money Laundering capabilities

Large financial institutions are getting involved in digital assets by investing capital, time and effort into on-chain analytics solutions.

The new year began with the news that notable Web3 entrepreneur Kevin Rose fell victim to a phishing scam in which he lost over $1 million worth of nonfungible tokens (NFTs). 

As mainstream financial institutions begin to provide services related to Web3, crypto and NFTs, they would be custodians of client assets. They must protect their clients from bad actors and identify whether client assets have been obtained through illicit activities.

The crypto industry hasn’t made it easy for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) functions within organizations. The sector has innovated constructs like cross-chain bridges, mixers and privacy chains, which hackers and crypto thieves can use to obfuscate stolen assets. Very few technical tools or frameworks can help navigate this rabbit hole.

Regulators have recently come down hard on some crypto platforms, pressuring centralized exchanges to delist privacy tokens. In August 2022, Dutch police arrested Tornado Cash developer Alexey Pertsev, and they have worked on controlling transactions through mixers since then.

While centralized governance is considered antithetical to the Web3 ethos, the pendulum may have to swing in the other direction before reaching a balanced middle ground that protects users and doesn’t curtail innovation.

And while large institutions and banks have to grapple with the technological complexities of Web3 to provide digital assets services to their clients, they will only be able to provide suitable customer protection if they have a robust AML framework.

AML frameworks will need several capabilities that banks must evaluate and build. These capabilities could be built in-house or achieved by collaborating with third-party solutions.

A few vendors in this space are Solidus Labs, Moralis, Cipher Blade, Elliptic, Quantumstamp, TRM Labs, Crystal Chain and Chainalysis. These firms are focused on delivering holistic (full-stack) AML frameworks to banks and financial institutions.

For these vendor platforms to deliver a holistic approach to AML around digital assets, they must have several inputs. The vendor provides several of these, while others are sourced from the bank or institution they work with.

Data sources and inputs

Institutions need a ton of data from varied sources to effectively identify AML risks. The breadth and depth of data an institution can access will decide the effectiveness of its AML function. Some of the key inputs needed for AML and fraud detection are below.

The AML policy is often a broad definition of what a firm should watch for. This is generally broken down into rules and thresholds that will help implement the policy. 

An AML policy could state that all digital assets linked to a sanctioned nation-state like North Korea must be flagged and addressed.

The policy could also provide that transactions would be flagged if more than 10% of the transaction value could be traced back to a wallet address that contains the proceeds of a known theft of assets.

For instance, if 1 Bitcoin (BTC) is sent for custody with a tier-one bank, and if 0.2 BTC had its source in a wallet containing the proceeds of the Mt. Gox hack, even if attempts had been made to hide the source by running it through 10 or more hops before reaching the bank, that would raise an AML red flag to alert the bank to this potential risk.

Recent: Death in the metaverse: Web3 aims to offer new answers to old questions

AML platforms use several methods to label wallets and identify the source of transactions. These include consulting third-party intelligence such as government lists (sanctions and other bad actors); web scraping crypto addresses, the darknet, terrorist financing websites or Facebook pages; employing common spend heuristics that can identify crypto addresses controlled by the same person; and machine learning techniques like clustering that can identify cryptocurrency addresses controlled by the same person or group.

Data gathered through these techniques are the building block to the fundamental capabilities AML functions within banks and financial services institutions must create to deal with digital assets.

Wallet monitoring and screening

Banks will need to perform proactive monitoring and screening of customer wallets, wherein they can assess whether a wallet has interacted directly or indirectly with illicit actors like hackers, sanctions, terrorist networks, mixers and so on.

Illustration of assets in a wallet categorized and labeled. Source: Elliptic

Once labels are tagged to wallets, AML rules are applied to ensure the wallet screening is within the risk limits.

Blockchain investigation

Blockchain investigation is critical to ensure transactions happening on the network do not involve any illicit activities.

An investigation is performed on blockchain transactions from ultimate source to ultimate destination. Vendor platforms offer functionalities such as filtering on transaction value, number of hops or even the ability to identify on-off ramp transactions as part of an investigation automatically.

Illustration of Elliptic platform tracing a transaction back to the dark web. Source: Elliptic

Platforms offer a pictorial hop chart showing every single hop a digital asset has taken through the network to get from the first to the most recent wallet. Platforms like Elliptic can identify transactions that even stem from the dark web.

Multiasset monitoring

Monitoring risk where multiple tokens are used to launder money on the same blockchain is another critical capability that AML platforms must have. Most layer 1 protocols have several applications that have their own tokens. Illicit transactions could happen using any of these tokens, and monitoring must be broader than just one base token.

Cross-chain monitoring

Cross-chain transaction monitoring has come to haunt data analysts and AML experts for a while. Apart from mixers and dark web transactions, cross-chain transactions are perhaps the hardest problem to solve. Unlike mixers and dark web transactions, cross-chain asset transfers are commonplace and a genuine use case that drives interoperability.

Also, wallets that hold assets that hopped through mixers and the dark web can be labeled and red-flagged, as these are considered amber flags from an AML perspective straightaway. It wouldn’t be possible just to flag a cross-chain transaction, as it is fundamental to interoperability.

AML initiatives around cross-chain transactions in the past have been a challenge as cross-chain bridges can be opaque in the way they move assets from one blockchain to another. As a result, Elliptic has come up with a multitiered approach to solving this problem.

An illustration of how a cross-chain transaction between Polygon and Ethereum is identified as having its source with a crypto mixer — a sanctioned entity. Source: Elliptic

The simplest scenario is when the bridge provides end-to-end transparency across chains for every transaction, and the AML platform can pick that up from the chains. Where such traceability is not possible due to the nature of the bridge, AML algorithms use time value matching, where assets that left a chain and arrived at another are matched using the time of transfer and the value of the transfer.

The most challenging scenario is where none of those techniques can be used. For instance, asset transfers to the Bitcoin Lightning Network from Ethereum can be opaque. In such cases, cross-bridge transactions can be treated like those into mixers and the dark web, and will generally be flagged by the algorithm due to the lack of transparency.

Smart contract screening 

Smart contract screening is another crucial area to protect decentralized finance (DeFi) users. Here, smart contracts are checked to ensure there are no illicit activities with the smart contracts that institutions must be aware of.

This is perhaps most relevant for hedge funds wanting to participate in liquidity pools in a DeFi solution. It is less important for banks at this point, as they generally do not participate directly in DeFi activities. However, as banks get involved with institutional DeFi, smart contract-level screening would become extremely critical.

VASP due diligence

Exchanges are classed as Virtual assets service providers (VASPs). Due diligence will look at the exchange’s overall exposure based on all addresses associated with the exchange.

Some AML vendor platforms provide a view of risk based on the country of incorporation, Know Your Customer requirements and, in some cases, the state of financial crime programs. Unlike previous capabilities, VASP checks involve both on-chain and off-chain data.

Recent: Tel Aviv Stock Exchange’s crypto trading proposal a ‘closed-loop system’

AML and on-chain analytics is a fast-evolving space. Several platforms are working toward solving some of the most complex technology problems that would help institutions safeguard their client assets. Yet, this is a work in progress, and much needs to be done to have robust AML controls for digital assets.