Central Bank

Taiwan central bank completes wholesale CBDC study, plans next steps

A central bank official spoke about ongoing CBDC research and other payment modernization initiatives Taiwan is exploring.

Taiwan’s central bank has completed a feasibility study of wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) and is continuing to consider its introduction. The central bank is seeking feedback from businesses and academics and will continue to work on platform design, Deputy Governor Mei-lie Chu said on Dec. 7. 

In a lengthy speech at an event for bankers, Chu outlined what she called Banking 4.0, or “services embedded in customers’ daily lives,” including the integration of artificial intelligence and advanced mobile and digital technology into banking. She devoted about half of her presentation to CBDC.

Chu referred to Bank for International Settlements research and said she saw the advantages of CBDCs and tokenization of real-world assets. Furthermore:

Read more

Bitcoin is up 170% since the ECB called its ‘last gasp’ at $16.4K

Bitcoin completely contradicts what the European Central Bank warned about in late 2022.

Bitcoin (BTC) has gained almost 170% since the European Central Bank (ECB) warned of its impending “irrelevance.”

As noted by crypto proponent Eric Wall and others on Dec. 4, BTC price action has done the complete opposite of economists’ predictions.

Bitcoin traded at just $16,400 when, on Nov. 30, 2022, the ECB published a blog post dedicated to its death.

Read more

Italy and South Korea central banks agree on CBDC cooperation

The central banks of Italy and South Korea announced a memorandum of understanding in the development and deployment of CBDCs.

Banca d’Italia — Italy’s central bank — announced on Dec.

According to the Italian central bank, the memorandum of understanding includes the “mutual sharing of knowledge and information” when it comes to information and communication technology (ICT) issues.

Specifically, it mentions ICT issues related to real-time settlement systems and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

The announcement said the meeting was attended by the general manager of the Banca d’Italia, Luigi Federico Signorini, who signed off on the agreement.

Related: UK House of Commons recommends further CBDC tests on viability, risks

Throughout the last year, both countries have been exploring CBDCs, though with different approaches. 

In Italy, the central bank has mainly been focusing on interoperability in its solutions for settling distributed ledger technology (DLT)-based transactions via hash-linked contracts rather than a wholesale CBDC approach, as is the case with other European countries.

Meanwhile, South Korea started piloting its CBDC infrastructure technology in October.

Read more

Solomon Islands, Soramitsu team up for Bokolo Cash CBDC proof-of-concept

The Solomons join tiny island nations worldwide at the forefront of CBDC development.

The Central Bank of Solomon Islands has launched a proof-of-concept for a central bank digital currency (CBDC) called Bokolo Cash, with Japanese blockchain companySoramitsu providing support.

Bokolo Cash will be worth one Solomon Islands dollar.

Wholesale transfers between commercial banks and simulated cross-border payments and remittances will also be tested. Users will undergo “two-tier” Know Your Customer verification, according to Soramitsu.

Related: Small Islands, big problems: Can Bitcoin fix this? Cointelegraph Cape Verde video

Bokolo Cash will operate locally on a tailor-made blockchain based on Hyperledger’s Iroha.

The project was initiated on Nov. Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare said:

Read more

Foreign trade and pensions: What’s next for Russia’s CBDC project?

The Russian digital ruble pilot launch was delayed until at least May, but the government still hopes to kick off the currency in 2024.

The pilot for Russia’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot should have been launched on April 1, but it was delayed at practically the last moment due to the slow pace of the necessary associated legislation passing through parliament. 

However, with the launch of the pilot still possible in May and the general roll-out of the digital ruble scheduled for 2024, the Russian project remains one of the most important CBDC developments to watch — especially given its possible role in cross-border payments between BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and the intent to include it in the massive state-controlled pension system.

A brief timeline of Russia’s CBDC

The first time the Bank of Russia, the country’s central bank, announced its plans to explore the possibility of issuing a digital currency was in 2017. Back then, the bank’s first deputy governor, Olga Skorobogatova, said a CBDC would be a priority for the bank and that it would be looking into it in the near future.

However, at the time, Skorobogatova’s boss — Bank of Russia Governor Elvira Nabiullina — refused to acknowledge it as a “top priority,” instead calling it “a medium-term, or, perhaps, a long-term” prospect.

In 2022, the Bank of Russia revealed it planned to roll out the digital ruble across all banks in the country by 2024. The bank said the implementation would take place in stages and involve extensive testing and infrastructure development. It stated that the digital ruble would coexist with cash and non-cash payment systems, providing consumers more flexibility.

Perhaps the most significant factor in accelerating the CBDC’s development was the need for a reliable tool for foreign trade and settlement following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent sanctions implemented by several countries worldwide.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

By early 2023, local media was reporting that the Bank Of Russia had begun studying two possible cross-border settlement models with the digital ruble.

In February 2023, Skorobogatova publicly announced that the first consumer pilot for the CBDC would take place on April 1, 2023. The experiment would involve 13 local banks and several merchants, as well as real consumers — though it would be limited to the employees of participating companies.

Russian state media subsequently reported that the pilot was delayed pending the passage of specific legislation by the State Duma, the lower chamber of the Russian parliament. The legislation will reportedly come into force no earlier than the beginning of May.

Elena Klyuchareva, senior associate at Russian law firm KKMP, told Cointelegraph that two laws would enable the digital ruble launch. The first is a bill on amendments to the Civil Code, which determines the legal nature of the digital ruble as “a form of non-cash money and contractual relations arising from the use of a digital account.”

The second is a bill on amendments to several laws, the main one being the “Law on National Payment System.” These amendments stipulate the basis for the functioning of the digital ruble platform and the responsibilities of its participants.

Both bills were adopted in the first reading by the State Duma on March 16, 2023. The term for commenting expired on April 14, 2023. “We may expect the continuation of its discussion soon, most likely in May,” Klyuchareva added.

Digitalization and retirees’ anxiety

Governor Nabiullina herself first suggested using the digital ruble in pension payments back in 2021, with few details regarding how it would work.

Discussions around the idea resurfaced at the end of March 2023 as the state-controlled Izvestia newspaper once again teased the CBDC pilot. Several weeks later, Nabiullina had to clarify that the digital ruble wouldn’t be the principal or even the common currency for pension payments but an additional option.

Nabiullina in 2017

The pension system, for which the state is primarily responsible, is a traditionally sensitive area of politics and economics in Russia. With the elderly often being far from tech-savvy, the mention of something “digital” can provoke anxiety. However, Chris Emms, a former business developer at Bitcoin.com who now lives in Russia, said:

“The average Russian pensioner will still be able to spend their money in the exact same way and likely won’t even realize that their money is digital.”

Aleksandr Podobnykh, head of the Saint Petersburg branch of the Association of Chief Information Security Officers, also doesn’t see any potential tension.

He told Cointelegraph that while many citizens, including pensioners, will eventually interact with the digital ruble, the government will probably use some kind of incentivization policy to help people switch to the digital form of money. In fact, digitalization has been a priority for quite some time.

“Today, there are a huge number of initiatives and events aimed at improving the culture of citizens in the field of digital technologies and electronic services. Special attention is also paid to information on investment and security issues in this area,” Podobnykh said.

Will the digital ruble find adoption?

Will the digital ruble significantly affect the use of private cryptocurrencies in the country? All over the world, CBDCs are under development, and the crypto community at large perceives this as governments’ answer to the rise of digital money.

The Russian central bank has been highly hostile to any idea of legalizing crypto and even fought the Ministry of Finance on the matter. Podobnykh has no doubts about the bank’s plans regarding the new currency:

“Undoubtedly, with such an emphasis of the central bank on the monopoly use of the ruble, its position will remain strong. And don’t forget the plans to use it in calculations in the CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization] and BRICS countries.”

Emms sees the launch of the CBDC as a type of compromise between the anti-crypto central bank and the Russian politicians in the Duma who are “taking a positive stance over crypto regulation in general.” He believes the central bank hopes Russians will “choose to put their money into CBDC instead of buying high-risk altcoins.”

Recent: Connecting DeFi: How multichain token systems can improve liquidity

Klyuchareva said that the Bank of Russia expects the digital ruble to replace cryptocurrencies within Russia and be more popular as a safer instrument for settlements and investment. “Whether this expectation will come to life remains to be seen,” she concluded.

Speaking to the members of one of the parliamentary parties on April 17, Nabiullina didn’t refute the possibility of using cryptocurrency in foreign trade. Strangely enough, she didn’t specify whether this cryptocurrency would be private or issued by the central bank but mentioned the creation of “special entities responsible for mining.”

That makes the central bank’s stance on the digital ruble and private crypto less transparent — the “experimental” plan to mine some currency and the testing of a national CBDC for cross-border settlements seem to contradict each other. But one thing is certain, in Nabiullina’s words:

“Cryptocurrency shouldn’t be used inside the country.”

Nigerian crypto foreign investment is at a record low: Study

Foreign direct investment in Nigeria fell by 33% last year due to a severe shortage of dollars, which discouraged crypto companies from expanding into the country.

The largest economy in Africa has a foreign investment problem despite exponential growth in crypto adoption.

The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) reported on Tuesday that foreign direct investment (FDI) in Nigeria, the largest economy in Africa, dropped by 33% last year due to a severe shortage of dollars. The shortage has also discouraged crypto companies from expanding into the country. In 2022, investment declined to $468 million from the previous year’s $698 million. According to the data, FDI has decreased by approximately 90% since its peak of $4.7 billion in 2008.

The adoption of crypto in Nigeria has grown at an exponential rate. The country has active adult crypto traders, with many citizens now preferring to store their money in digital currencies over fiat cash due to the constant devaluation of the national currency, the naira. In Chainalysis’ 2020 Cryptocurrency Geography Report, Nigeria ranked eighth in crypto adoption and usage rate among 154 countries included in the study. This adoption rate is expected to have encouraged more foreign crypto investment in the nation but the reverse is the case.

Foreign direct investment into Nigeria plunges. Source: Bloomberg

In an interview with Cointelegraph, local data analyst and crypto enthusiast, Obinna Uzoije, said the low rate of foreign investment in Nigeria could be attributed to the fact that the use of cryptocurrency was yet to go mainstream in the country. Uzoije explained that the lack of use of crypto in day-to-day economic activities and the ban on financial institutions from servicing crypto exchanges were to be blamed for the low investment rate.

As part of the 2021 ban, the Central Bank of Nigeria directed all commercial banks to close accounts belonging to crypto exchanges and other businesses transacting in cryptocurrencies in the country.

In a tweet, Olumide Adesina, a certified investment trader, reacted to the NBS report by saying that despite Nigerians “loving” crypto, fintech and entertainment, no state has taken the initiative to attract foreign investors in those areas. In another tweet, Adesina said Lagos State building a real tech and crypto community like Silicon Valley would create thousands of direct jobs.

Related: Paxful shutdown hits Nigeria harder than the rest of the world — Here’s why

Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, had earlier announced proposals for crypto adoption in the state, according to local media reports. Some of the initiatives proposed by Sanwo-Olu include establishing a dedicated sandbox regulatory framework for cryptocurrency, creating a crypto-focused innovation hub, and providing incentives for businesses that accept crypto payments.

Magazine: Best and worst countries for crypto taxes — plus crypto tax tips

European Banking Federation shares its vision of digital euro, wCBDC, bank tokens

The EBF calls itself the voice of the European banking sector; it expressed its support for European digital money, with suggestions of its own.

The European Banking Federation (EBF) has released a paper detailing its vision for the digital money ecosystem of the future, and the retail digital euro in particular. The carefully worded paper expressed values and concerns about the digital euro from the perspective of commercial banks. 

The paper, released on March 28, emphasized the bank’s values, such as stability and privacy. It called for closer public-private partnership in the introduction of the digital euro. “There is currently no dialogue in place to address the fundamental changes and risks to the monetary and financial system,” the paper said. At the same time, it stated that there needs to be a framework for permanent high-level engagement.

The EBF ecosystem vision emphasized the role of the private sector in all aspects, beginning with infrastructure, where Europe needs to lessen dependence on outside “actors.” That ecosystem would contain three elements: the digital euro, a wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) and bank-issued money tokens.

Related: ECB executive board member outlines plans for digital euro to European Parliament

In the EBF vision, the digital euro should have three levels, with a European Central Bank role and two industry levels — the first to interact with the Single Euro Payments Area and an “Industry Level B” that “would be subsequently developed and operated by the private sector, in compliance with the principles set out in the previous layers.” Those principles have yet to be developed fully. The paper continued:

“The European market needs the authorities to clarify the interaction of different and converging policy objectives, especially when it comes to the development of pan-European payment solutions at the Point of Sale / Point of Interaction.”

The paper was careful to refer to blockchain technology only in reference to certain parts of its envisioned ecosystem. A wholesale CBDC, where interoperability is key to enabling cross-border transactions with central bank money, was assumed to operate on distributed ledger technology (DLT).

In addition, bank-issued money tokens had a crucial role in the EBF vision for “business needs such as automated industrial processes that run on DLT and use smart contracts.” These tokens apparently correspond to Industry Level B of the digital euro scheme. More standardization would be needed for these solutions as well, the paper noted.

The EBF represents 33 national banking associations and 3,500 individual banks.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Custodia Bank’s membership denied for ties with crypto markets, says US Fed

The United States Federal Reserve released an 86-page report on March 24 detailing the reasons for denying Custodia Bank’s application for membership.

The United States Federal Reserve released an 86-page report on March 24 detailing the reasons for denying Custodia Bank’s application for membership in January, including the bank’s involvement in the crypto space. 

According to the report, the Fed’s board has raised “concerns about banks with business plans focused on a narrow sector of the economy”, with a high concentration of activities related to the crypto industry. The report notes:

“Those concerns are further elevated with respect to Custodia because it is an uninsured depository institution seeking to focus almost exclusively on offering products and services related to the crypto-asset sector, which presents heightened illicit finance and safety and soundness risks.”

The document also states that Fed’s members must align their risk management systems and controls with the activities described in their business plans. Based on the Fed’s purview, “Custodia had not yet developed a sufficient risk-management framework for its proposed cryptoasset-related activities, nor had it addressed the highly correlated risks associated with its undiversified business model.” 

If accepted as a member of the System, Custodia bank would be further forbidden to run crypto-related services “given the speculative and volatile nature of the crypto-asset ecosystem” that is not consistent with the purposes of the Federal Reserve Act.” The report states:

“Further, if the Board were to approve Custodia’s membership application, it would prohibit Custodia from engaging in a number of the novel and unprecedented activities it proposes to conduct—at least until such time as the activities conducted as principal are permissible for national banks […].”

In response to the report, Custodia Bank’s spokesperson Nathan Miller told Cointelegraph the “recently released Fed order is the result of numerous procedural abnormalities, factual inaccuracies that the Fed refused to correct, and general bias against digital assets.”

Miller also noted that the decision is a demonstration of the Fed’s “shortsightedness and inability to adapt to changing markets.” Miller further said that “perhaps more attention to areas of real risk would have prevented the bank closures that Custodia was created to avoid. It is a shame that Custodia must turn to the courts to vindicate its rights and compel the Fed to comply with the law.” 

The Fed’s report is 14x longer than its previous longest denial order, and 41% longer than the Fed’s longest order on any subject, the bank claims. In late January, the Fed denied a membership request from Custodia Bank, as well as a second application in February, claiming that its application “was inconsistent with the required factors under the law.” 

Update (on March 25, at 4:44 pm UTC): This article has been updated to include Custodia Bank’s response.

Custodia Bank’s membership denied for ties with crypto markets, says US Fed

The United States Federal Reserve released an 86-page report on March 24 detailing the reasons for denying Custodia Bank’s application for membership.

The United States Federal Reserve released an 86-page report on March 24 detailing the reasons for denying Custodia Bank’s application for membership in January, including the bank’s involvement in the crypto space. 

According to the report, the Fed’s board has raised “concerns about banks with business plans focused on a narrow sector of the economy,” with a high concentration of activities related to the crypto industry. The report states:

“Those concerns are further elevated with respect to Custodia because it is an uninsured depository institution seeking to focus almost exclusively on offering products and services related to the crypto-asset sector, which presents heightened illicit finance and safety and soundness risks.“

The document also states that Fed members must align their risk management systems and controls with the activities described in their business plans. Based on the Fed’s purview, “Custodia had not yet developed a sufficient risk-management framework for its proposed crypto asset-related activities, nor had it addressed the highly correlated risks associated with its undiversified business model.“ 

If accepted as a member of the Fed system, Custodia Bank would be further forbidden to run crypto-related services “given the speculative and volatile nature of the crypto-asset ecosystem” that is not consistent with the purposes of the Federal Reserve Act.“ The report states:

“Further, if the Board were to approve Custodia’s membership application, it would prohibit Custodia from engaging in a number of the novel and unprecedented activities it proposes to conduct —at least until such time as the activities conducted as principal are permissible for national banks […].“

In response to the report, Custodia Bank’s spokesperson Nathan Miller told Cointelegraph the “recently released Fed order is the result of numerous procedural abnormalities, factual inaccuracies that the Fed refused to correct, and general bias against digital assets.“

Miller also said the decision is a demonstration of the Fed’s “shortsightedness and inability to adapt to changing markets.“ Miller further said that “perhaps more attention to areas of real risk would have prevented the bank closures that Custodia was created to avoid. It is a shame that Custodia must turn to the courts to vindicate its rights and compel the Fed to comply with the law.” 

The Fed’s report is 14x longer than its previous longest denial order and 41% longer than the Fed’s longest order on any subject, the bank claims. In late January, the Fed denied a membership request from Custodia Bank, as well as a second application in February, claiming that its application “was inconsistent with the required factors under the law.” 

Update (on March 25, at 4:44 pm UTC): This article has been updated to include Custodia Bank’s response.

Bank profits at risk from potential CBDC transformation of global economy: Moody’s

CBDCs are here to stay, it seems, and Moody’s is looking at their implications for the global economy and international banking.

Emerging central bank digital currency cross-border transaction technology could transform the global economy by providing faster, cheaper and safer services for many of its players. But banks may not fare as well in that new economy, Moody’s Investor Service said in a report dated March 21.

Many proposals for the domestic use of CBDCs foresee a crucial intermediating role for banks in their operations, but cross-border CBDC transactions would depend on entirely new infrastructure that reduced the role of banks more severely, Moody’s pointed out. Banks would see benefits from the new technology, too. Settlement risk could be reduced or eliminated:

“Banks would be able to make, clear, and settle cross-border payments at low cost and in seconds without needing to sign up to multiple payment systems or rely on correspondent banks in other countries.”

The same innovations would also “reduce banks’ profits from payments, correspondent services and likely also from foreign-exchange transactions.” The role of correspondent banks could be eliminated entirely. Not only that:

“In a CBDC-driven economy, banks may well need to redesign their operations. They may be obliged to join new networks and create the infrastructure necessary to support CBDC interoperability at scale, which will impose a burden on resources in the short term.”

Interoperability for both retail and wholesale CBDC is being worked out in experimental projects, often with the participation of the Bank for International Settlements. “Central banks may need to compromise on some of the decision-making to make their CBDCs interoperable,” Moody’s said. Otherwise, “digital islands” could be created among small groups of countries that can transact with each other but no other countries.

Related: India, UAE to explore CBDC bridge to facilitate trade, remittances without USD

Issues such as Anti-Money Laundering, sanctions and privacy would require a legal and regulatory framework, and support for CBDCs is not universal. “Financial incumbents who benefit from existing architecture will likely not help facilitate adoption,” the report said.

A United States CBDC faces opposition from some lawmakers because of privacy concerns. Direct exchange of currencies could also reduce the role of the U.S. dollar in the world economy, which does not add to its appeal in Congress.

Moody’s downgraded the U.S. banking sector to “negative” on March 14. It has examined the potentially disruptive effects of CBDC on commercial banking before. The present report came out nearly simultaneously with the U.S. Treasury report detailing potential effects a CBDC could have on the domestic banking system.